Eustace Mullins’ Curse of Canaan is Disinformation

I read The Curse of Canaan a couple years ago based on recommendations from fans of Eustace Mullins. Many of his fans are deep into New World Order conspiracies and in particular the Jewish question. C of C is probably Mullins’ best known work. At that time I was just getting into the JQ. I have to say I was highly disappointed with the book – whether it was back then or now. It was sloppily researched, had numerous editing problems, and had little in the way of documentation and references cited. Now that I know much more about the JQ, especially in regards to the bible, I can confidently say that Mullins is a gatekeeper. I am going to dissect only the first chapter (The War Against Shem) of the book. I don’t have the time, nor do I think it is necessary to dissect the entire book. I have to say this book was an insult to my intelligence. The entire thesis of the book is that it was the Canaanites (instead of the Israelites) who are behind the world order and that world order started around biblical times and continues to this day. On page 32 of C of C:

The Will of Canaan today remains the operating instructions of the Canaanite heirs, who presently control the World Order.

Now I don’t know whether the Canaanites were real groups of people or whether they were metaphors for certain groups of people. Mullins makes his case with sloppy research, taking passages out of context, and pulling things out of thin air like a magician. According to Mullins, the Canaanites represent every evil that the world has seen. On page 21:

The Curse of Canaan was extended to the land which was named after him, the Land of Canaan. The Canaanites themselves, the people of this land, became the greatest curse upon humanity, and so they remain today. Not only did they originate the practices of demon-worship, occult rites, child sacrifice, and cannibalism, but as they went abroad, they brought these obscene practices into every land which they entered. Not only did they bring their demonic cult to Egypt, but, known by their later name, the Phoenicians, as they were called after 1200 B.C., they became the demonizers of civilization through successive epochs, being known in medieval history as the Venetians, who destroyed the great Byzantine Christian civilization, and later as “the black nobility,” which infiltrated the nations of Europe and gradually assumed power through trickery, revolution, and financial legerdemain.

That passage is an example of pulling things out of a hat. Mullins claims that the Canaanites brought those practices of child sacrifice and cannibalism in every land in which they entered but provides absolutely no references to back that up. Even the Jewish Encyclopedia says that child sacrifices were unlikely to have been a part of Canaanite worship:

Apart from the offerings of fruits from the earth and the firstlings of cattle, much is not known with regard to the rites of the popular Ba’al-Worship. Self-torture and mutilation characteristic of the Phenician type (I Kings xviii. 28) were probably absent from the simpler and freer usages of the primitive local observances. It is also doubtful whether the sacrifice of children, proper to the service of Molech, was ever a feature of inland Canaanitic Ba’al-Worship (Jer. xix. 5 is to be corrected by the LXX.). The shrines were little more than altars with the symbol of the Ashtoreth planted beside it—the sacred tree-stem or pole named from an old Canaanite goddess, Ashera, with whom Ashtoreth was identified.

Continued on page 22 of C of C:

The reputation of Canaan is to be found in many ancient records, although its foul history has been carefully expunged from even more of the historic archives and libraries. In 1225 B.C., the Pharaoh Merneptah, who, because of his victories in the Canaanite region, was known as “Binder of Gezer,” set up a stele to commemorate his successes. Among the inscriptions placed thereon was this: “Plundered is the Canaan, with every evil; All lands are united and pacified.”

Which ancient records? How about listing them Mr. Mullins?

Page 25:

Nimrod became the first man to rule the whole world.

Where does that come from?

Page 27:

The records of the genocide against the people of Shem are apparent throughout the archives of history, but there is not a school or university whose faculty will apprise its students of this simple fact. This in itself explains much which is usually dismissed as being “beyond explanation.” The reason or this odd development is that the descendants of Ham traditionally have usurped the educational process, through their earlier usurpation of the priesthood to carryon their Satanic work. They have controlled the educational system ever since, converting it to their own evil purposes. It is of even greater interest that not a single school of theology anywhere in the world takes note of this central fact of history, a red thread which runs continuously through the record of events.

Again, more unsupported assertions.

Page 27:

However, a much more important point, and one that has again been obscured or hidden by the priests who controlled the educational system throughout the last three thousand years, is the fact that it was Shem who founded and built the great civilization of Egypt.

Where the hell did he get that from?

Page 29:

Not only did the priests falsify the records of Shem, but they also succeeded in eliminating most of the subsequent history of his fair-skinned descendants, the Shemites, or, as they are sometimes called, the Semites.

It is not clear what lineage the bible classifies the fair-skinned descendants (whites), if they were even classified at all. If they did come from the line of Shem, they certainly did not come from the line of Jacob. Again Mullins needs to back up his claims. He certainly doesn’t mention that the Edomites also came from the line of Shem.

Page 32:

The Will of Canaan has always been concealed from them because it is the basic program of conspiracy and secret rites which enable the Canaanites to wreak their hatred upon the descendants of Shem.

Who has been wreaking havoc on whom? The fact is the Israelites, the descendants of Shem, have been brutally wreaking havoc on all the Gentiles. See my posts concerning the Books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Jeremiah, Isaiah, and Ezekiel.

Page 35:

The prohibition against mingling with the demon-worshipping Canaanites remained one of God’s strongest commands. God said, “So shall we be separated, I and all of Thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the earth” (Exodus 3:16).

In actuality God prohibited the Israelites from mingling with ANY FOREIGNER – not just the Canaanites which Mullins likes to demonize. For example in Ezra 10:10-11:

Then Ezra the priest stood up and said to them, “You have been unfaithful; you have married foreign women, adding to Israel’s guilt. Now honor the Lord, the God of your ancestors, and do his will. Separate yourselves from the peoples around you and from your foreign wives.”

This racism is promoted to this very day in Israel, where interracial marriages remain illegal.

Page 38:

The Canaanites were divided into the Amorites, Hittites, Moabites, Midianites, Philistines, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, Sepharvaims, Perizzites, and affiliated tribes, all of which are routinely denounced in the Bible.

WRONG. The Ammonites, Moabites, and Edomites are descendants of Shem, not of Ham and certainly not of Canaan. Mullins hoped readers would not notice that because that would destroy his theory that the Shemites were the victims.

Page 38

The destructive nature of the Canaanites upon other nations in which they settled is nowhere more strongly demonstrated than in Egypt, the first land to be corrupted by their barbaric practices.

Again more examples of making an assertion without citing references. Now I’m not necessarily saying that Mullins has been making stuff out of thin air, though I believe a good bit of the book has been made up, but why does he not document these things? Where could I go to look for this material?

Page 40:

It was not long before the simple ceremonies of vice began to pall on the worshippers of Baal. They sought greater excitement in rites of human sacrifice and cannibalism, in which the torture and murder of small children were featured. To consolidate their power over the people, the priests of the Canaanites claimed that all firstborn children were owed to their demon gods, and they were given over for sacrifice. This lewd and barbaric practice was noted in Isaiah 57:3-5: “But you, draw near hither, sons of the sorceress, offspring of the adulterer and the harlot. Of whom are you making sport? Against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? Are ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood? Inflaming yourself with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the cleft of the rocks?”

That passage in Isaiah does not refer specifically to the Canaanites. It refers to any group of people considered the enemies of the Israelites.

Though I only intended to cover chapter 1, an Amazon reviewer pointed out to this error in Chapter 2:

The first paragraph in Chapter 2 is in significant error. Tubal-cain was NOT Noah’s brother. Noah was born through a man named Lamech in Adam’s downline, not Cain’s downline. Cain’s downline had a man named Lamech too but not the same Lamech that was born of Methusaleh.

Quoting From the Bible out of Context

Mullins quote many things out of context from the bible, which is not unusual among con-artists. On page 37:

“But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe and to do all His commandments and His statutes which I command thee this day, that all these curses shall come upon thee and overtake thee: …. The stranger that is within thy gates [the Canaanites or their descendants-Ed.] shall get up above thee very high, and thou shalt come down very low. He shall lend to thee, and thou shall not lend to him; he shall be the head and thou shalt be the tail” (Deuteronomy 28: 15, 43-44).

Again, Mullins makes the Canaanites out to be the evil ones which is why he puts their name in the brackets when the actual intention of the verse is to ANY GENTILE. This is one of the most egregious pieces of disinformation in the book. What Chapter 28 (verses 15 to the end) of Deuteronomy is, is the lists of punishments that Yahweh threatens the Israelites if they do not heed all his commands as laid out under Mosaic Law. Among the commands are that of the extermination of all the native inhabitants of Canaan (which the Israelites plan to reside) which includes the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites. Also among the commands are that of a choice of enslavement or extermination to Gentiles who are not in the vicinity of where the Israelites reside. Deuteronomy 20:10-12, 15:

When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city … 15 This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.

The verses of Deuteronomy 28: 15, 43-44 that Mullins cites is actually Yahweh’s punishment to the Israelites that if they don’t enslave the Gentiles through usury, the Gentiles will enslave THEM through usury. Deuteronomy 28:12 is what Yahweh instructs the Israelites:

You will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. The Lord will make you the head, not the tail.

Deuteronomy 23:20 in the Living Torah:

Do not deduct advance interest from your brother, whether it is interest for money, interest for food, or interest for anything else for which interest is normally taken. Although you may take such interest from a gentile, you may not do so from your brother. If you keep this rule, God will bless you in all your endeavors on the land to which you are coming to occupy.

That paragraph right after Mullins’ Deuteronomy quote:

Certainly this is the situation which exists in the United States today. The Venetians control the Federal Reserve System; they lend to us, but we do not lend to them; they are the head, and we are the tail.

The Venetians control the Fed? Are you kidding me?

 

You really don’t need to read past the preface of this book. On the bottom of page 9 of the preface:

It is for this reason that politicians, of necessity, must become followers of Satan in the rebellion against God. Politicians must deceive the people in order to gain power over them, just as Satan must deceive the whole world if he is to continue his rebellion against God.

Though Mullins is correct that the ugly history of the struggles of the world is that of society fighting against a Satanic order, he absolves the real Satanists and points the finger at the wrong group of people. He like many in the controlled media, makes the enemies look like the good guys while making the victims out to be the perpetrators. If you have read any of my previous posts addressing the nature of the God (Yahweh) of the bible, you know that Yahweh is not the loving universal god that he is made out to be. In fact he is the exact opposite. Mullins is either a gatekeeper or a dupe. Unfortunately many have fallen for conman like him.

Mullins’ Bio

In forty years of dedicated investigative research, Eustace Mullins has drawn considerable return fire. He was kept under daily surveillance by agents of the FBI for thirty-two years; no charges were ever placed against him. He is the only person ever fired from the staff of the Library of Congress for political reasons. He is the only writer who has had a book burned in Europe since 1945. After serving thirty-eight months in the U. S. Army Air Force during World War II, Eustace Mullins was educated at Washington and Lee University, Ohio State University, University of North Dakota, and New York University.

I find it quite odd that for someone who’s been doing 40 years of investigative research, worked in the Library of Congress, and attended four different universities he has not been able to provide any sort of real documentation backing up his claims in Curse of Canaan. If you are presenting a piece of work that is highly revisionist and highly anti-mainstream then the burden is on you to make your case and you had better back up your claims carefully. He doesn’t. When you see “credentials” like that stated just above then you should immediately be suspicious. How does one with all those credentials have little in the way of actual research to show? Eustace Mullins has quite a fan base which is odd for someone who is anti-establishment. The man also lived to a ripe old age of 87. Go figure.

Conclusion

Whether a group of people such as the Canaanites actually existed, I don’t know. Much of the bible has been a fabrication of history. However the intentions are clear. Regardless whether the Canaanites actually practiced the things that Mullins states is not the point. The problem with Mullins is that he demonizes one group of people and make them look like the perpetrators, while excusing the real perpetrators. This is a classic Jewish tactic (I’m not saying Mullins is Jewish, though he may be a Shabbos Goy). We do know that the Israelites of the bible considers every Gentile neighbor as their enemy, including the Canaanites, with no exception. The Israelites in the bible invaded Canaan and stole their land. The same thing happened 70 years ago with the Jews stealing Palestinian land to create the state of Israel.

We have seen the Jewish media make Hitler and the Germans out to be the subhumans that they were not. Ditto the Arab-Muslims who the Jewish media has constantly denigrated since 9/11. The problem is not the Canaanites, the Edomites, the Moabites, or Jebusites. The problem is the Israelites who author after author has made them seem like the good guys. Now much of the stories of the bible were fabrications of history, but the point is that the stories are taken seriously by those who are in power.

Unfortunately people will continue to be duped by Judaeo-Christian gatekeepers such as Eustace Mullins, Michael Hoffman, Nathaniel Kapner, and E Michael Jones because it is easy to trick people with the bible. Most people have a very superficial understanding of it and have never examined it carefully. The main theme of the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) is that of racial separatism. The bible requires that the Israelites MUST remain apart from everyone else. They must remain apart because they feel they are superior to everyone else and do not want to be tainted by “lesser” blood. Some feel that in order to remain separate, they must even exterminate their immediate neighbors to eliminate the risk of becoming assimilated. And in order to get the Israelites motivated to destroy their neighbors, they feel they must demonize their neighbors by spreading exaggerated fears of them as being dangerous and violent. That’s the reason why the bible vilify groups of people such as the Canaanites, Edomites, Moabites, or any other “ites”. They want to present them as dangerous subhuman savages so the Jews will continue to remain separate from them.

Advertisements
the real Syrian Free Press

War Press Info ~ Archive of Most Important Reliable Global War News

The Rabbit Hole

Denying the truth doesn't change the facts.

Levant Report

the Real Middle East, debunking the sound bites

Mothman777's Blog

A different perspective, suggestions for a better way of life for a better future for all