Who Controls America?

Every time we do something you tell me Americans will do this and will do that. I want to tell you something very clear, don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” – Ariel Sharon 10/3/01

Central banking

Banking and media control are the most important functions to control society. With central banking the entire nation can be controlled and major wars financed. The Federal Reserve System is privately owned and privately run. Because bankers primarily make their money off of interest, debt-binging, consumerism, and materialism are encouraged.

The idea of usury to enslave society has ancient roots. The Jews have always been good with money. This is illustrated in the bible and you don’t have to be a Christian to understand this. In fact the entire Jewish/gentile conflict goes back to at least biblical times. Jewish enslavement of Gentiles through usury is in Deuteronomy 23:20:

There are two other passages in Deuteronomy that permits the same. In the New Testament, John 2:13 illustrates Jesus’ intolerance for Jewish money-lending and capitalism:

And the passover of the Jews was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. And he found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: and he made a scourge of cords, and cast all out of the temple, both the sheep and the oxen; and he poured out the changers money, and overthrew their tables; and to them that sold the doves he said, Take these things hence; make not my Father’s house a house of merchandise.

The Rothschilds are a powerful Jewish family. It is thought that nearly all countries (including the US) are indebted to this family. The Rothschild family got underway in banking during the 18th century in Germany and spread throughout Western Europe. They quickly became a dynasty.

Give me control of a nation’s money, and I care not who makes her laws.
  – Mayer Amschel Rothschild

The Rothschild Banking Clan

  • Rothschild Bank of London – JEWISH OWNED
  • Rothschild Bank of Berlin – JEWISH OWNED
  • Goldman Sachs Bank of New York – JEWISH OWNED
  • Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York/Shearson American Express – JEWISH OWNED
  • Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris – JEWISH OWNED
  • Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy – JEWISH OWNED
  • Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany – JEWISH OWNED
  • Warburg Bank of Amsterdam – JEWISH OWNED
  • Lehman Brothers Bank of New York (Defunct) – JEWISH OWNED
  • Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (David Rockefeller) – JEWISH OWNED

The New York Branch of the Federal Reserve is the one with all the power. These Banks Own Shares in that Branch:

  • First National Bank of New York – James Stillman – JEWISH
  • National City Bank, New York – Mary W. Harnman – JEWISH
  • National Bank of Commerce, New York – A.D. Jiullard – JEWISH
  • Hanover National Bank, New York – Jacob Schiff – JEWISH
  • Chase National Bank, New York – JEWISH OWNED

The last four Federal Reserve Chairmans have been Jews:

  • Janet Yellen
  • Ben Bernanke
  • Alan Greenspan
  • Paul Volcker

Current Federal Reserve governors (as of September 2017)

  • Janet Yellen – JEWISH
  • Lael Brainard – JEWISH
  • Stanley Fischer – JEWISH
  • Jerome H. Powell – non-Jewish

Previous governors

  • Benjamin S. Bernanke, Chairman – JEWISH
  • Donald L. Kohn – JEWISH
  • Kevin M. Warsh – JEWISH
  • Randall S. Kroszner – JEWISH
  • Frederic S. Mishkin – JEWISH

The 12 District Banks (Obama’s 1st term)

  • Boston: Eric S. Rosengren – JEWISH
  • New York: Timothy Geithner – JEWISH
  • Philadelphia: Charles I. Plosser – JEWISH
  • Richmond: Jeffrey M. Lacker – JEWISH
  • St. Louis: James B. Bullard – JEWISH
  • Minneapolis: Gary H. Stern – JEWISH
  • Kansas City: Thomas M. Hoenig – JEWISH
  • Dallas: Richard W. Fisher – JEWISH
  • San Francisco: Janet L. Yellen – JEWISH
  • Cleveland: Sandra Pianalto – non-Jew
  • Atlanta: Dennis P. Lockhart – non-Jew
  • Chicago: Charles L. Evans – non-Jew

Source: http://lovkap.blogspot.com

 

The Media

“[T]here may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in the U. S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the big companies, and there is a force that we have to take into consideration.” – Richard M Nixon

Henry Ford on Jewish Propaganda and Mind Control

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Henry Ford warned America a hundred years ago in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion of impending tyranny. Protocol #12 on media control:

Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is being achieved by us due to the fact that all news items are received by only a few agencies, and their offices are a focal point for news coming in from all parts of the world. These agencies will already be entirely owned by us and will only publish what we dictate to them.

———————–

Disney – Michael Eisner (Ashkenazi Jew) – The largest of the media moguls. It also owns these subsidiaries:

  •    Touchstone/Buena Vista/Caravan/Hollywood Pictures – Joe Roth (Ashkenazi Jew)
  •    Miramax – Weinstein Brothers (Ashkenazi Jew)
  •    ESPN – Steven Bornstein (Ashkenazi Jew)
  •    ABC – Robert A. Iger (Ashkenazi Jew)

Time-Warner – Gerald Levin (Ashkenazi Jew) – The nation’s second largest media outlet. They own the following:

  •     Warner Brothers Records – Danny Goldberg (Ashkenazi Jew)
  •     HBO – Richard Plepler (Ashkenazi Jew)
  •     Warnervision – Stuart Hersch (Ashkenazi Jew)
  •     Time Warner’s publishing – Norman Pearlstine (Ashkenazi Jew) – largest magazine publisher in the nation

When Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley (real name Palinsky, a Jew) and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews. To block Turner’s bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a “friendly” takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network have been obstructed by Levin’s Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals.

ViacomMurray Rothstein (Ashkenazi Jew) – The nation’s third largest media outlet. They operate the following:

  • CBS – Les Moonves (Ashkenazi Jew)
  • Paramount Pictures – Sherry Lansing (Ashkenazi Jew)
  • Prentice Hall and Simon & Schuster
  • Showtime, MTV, and Nickelodeon

News Corporation – Rupert Murdoch (Gentile, however a strong supporter of Zionism) – The nation’s fourth largest media outlet. They operate the following:

  • Fox TV
  • Fox 20th Century Studios

Sony Corporation of America – Michael Schulhof (Ashkenazi Jew) – The nation’s fifth largest media outlet.

Comcast – Brian L. Roberts (Ashkenazi Jew) – also owns the following:

  • NBC Universal – Robert Greenblatt (Ashkenazi Jew)
  • Xfinity – Dave Watson (probable Gentile)
  • Dreamworks – Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, David Geffen (all three are Jews)

Newhouse – Newhouse brothers (Ashkenazi Jews) – owns the following:

  • Random House – largest trade book publishers
  • Newhouse Broadcasting – 26 daily newspapers, 12 broadcasting channels
  • New Yorker, Vogue, Madmoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden

As of 2013 BOTH the presidents and CEOs of the following studios were Jews:

  • Columbia Pictures
  • Dreamworks
  • Touchstone
  • Paramount
  • Miramax
  • MGM
  • Pixar
  • HBO

Others

  • New World Entertainment – Ronald Perelman (Ashkenazi Jew)
  • Seagram – Edgar Bronfman Jr (Ashkenazi Jew) – also owns PolyGram and Universal Studios

Internet

  • Wikipedia – Jimmy Wales (Ashkenazi Jew)
  • Facebook – Mark Zuckerberg – (Ashkenazi Jew)
  • Yahoo – Marissa Mayer /CEO (Ashkenazi Jew)
  • Google – Sergy Brin & Larry Page (both Ashkenazi Jews)
  • Youtube – Susan Wojcicki (Ashkenazi Jew)

https://thezog.wordpress.com & https://thezog.info

I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.

– Joel Stein, LA Times 12/19/08

If I submit a manuscript to a publishing house, it is again checked first for references to the Jews, and second, to see if its author is on the Jewish blacklist. In this manner, the Jews prevent any gentile writer from reaching the public if he is known to be indifferent or hostile to their goals, if he has refused to become a member of the shabez goi class. Any publication which rejects Jewish censorship is either driven out of business, or taken over by Jewish financial interests. A book which is published by gentiles who are not of the shabez goi class is ignored by the book review departments of mass publications, and bookstores refuse to stock it, for their stocks are reviewed monthly by traveling ADL agents who enter the store incognito, inspect the stock, and if any publication is found which mentions the Jews, the proprietor is threatened with various weapons, lawsuits, government action or financial revenge.”

– Eustace Mullins

Alternative News

The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” – Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

This topic would require a whole new article, which I may write about in the future. Just like mainstream media, much of the alternative media is Jewish controlled or influenced as well. Even worse is the pervasive attitude that because it’s internet media, it can be trusted. A prime example of Jewish control over alternative news is that of Alex Jones‘ Infowars. Infowars is one of the most popular alt-news sites on the web. The very purpose of folks like Alex Jones is to steer you away from those who are actually pulling the strings. An entire book could be written exposing this man. Infowars has at least 34 Jewish sponsors. At the very least AJ cannot discuss the Jewish question because his sponsors would defect on him.

 

Civil Rights

NAACPHoward Sachar writes in A History of Jews in America that “In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi Stephen Wise.”Additional Jewish-American founding members included Julius Rosenwald, Lillian Wald, and Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch. Wikipedia states that every president of the NAACP from 1915 to 1975 was Jewish. It is notable that Marcus Garvey, who is black, quit the NAACP in 1917 calling it a “white organization.” Between two-thirds and three-quarters of the funding for civil rights groups during the 1960s, the height of the civil rights movement, were by Jews.

ADL – One of the most influential organizations in the US. The ADL is constantly lobbying for ‘hate crime laws’, internet censorship, laws against Christian symbols in public places, actively promoting race mixing and homosexuality (though not for Jews/Israel). All 53 senior executives and directors of the ADL are Jewish.

SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) – Founded in 1971 by Jewish lawyer Joe Levin and Morris Seligman Dees (not Jewish but born into a philosemitic family who gave him his Jewish first name after Joseph Seligman; president Lincoln’s Jewish banker), currently headed by Julian Bond (black, communist sympathiser. Bond’s father’s first experience with racism in 1916 was with a Jew.)

Two of the center’s most well known activists are Mark Potok and Heidi Beirich. (both Jewish) Alexander Zaitchik is a former SPLC operative who now continues doing the SPLC’s work in another context. The SPLC has a long-standing reputation for manipulating statistics and exaggerating the extent of “racism” or “hate” in America. The group earns millions a year by making false claims about ‘hate groups’ and the dangers they pose to America.

ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) – Most thinking people know that the American Civil Liberties Union is vehemently anti-Christian. What they don’t know is that 3 of 6 of ACLU’s top national leaders are liberal Jewish activists. Although ACLU’s executive director, Anthony D. Romero, is an in-your-face Hispanic homosexual, second in command is Nadine Strossen, Jewish. She was given the ‘Woman of Distinction’ award from the Women’s League of Conservative Judaism and the ‘Women who Dared’ award from the National Council of Jewish Women. A member of the Council on Foreign Relations, she is married to Eli M. Noam, professor and founding director of Columbia University’s Institute for Tele-Information. Third in command at ACLU is legal counsel Steven Shapiro. As the legal mastermind of ACLU, he may well wield greatest power. Shapiro commands an army of 90 full-time lawyers, maintaining an active docket of cases harassing the public expression of Christian values across America.

 

The Presidency

Politics has nothing to do with morals. Anyone who tries to govern according to morals is a moron and unsuitable for office. A true politician must resort to cunning and lies if he expects to get anywhere. Great qualities such as honesty and integrity are a burden for any ruler. Anyone in politics who decides to start behaving like this – their career will be over before they know it.

Protocol #1 of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

The president is merely a puppet and not in real control of things. This may also answer the fact that you have the freedom to criticize the president but not the group of people who are actually in charge. Think about this the next time you vote. The advisers to the president are un-elected.

There’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican parties.”

– George Wallace

Top 10 Donors to Donald Trump’s 2016 Presidential Campaign

  • Sheldon Adelson (Ashkenazic Jew) – $25 million – it should be noted that this man in 2013 said “Obama should fire nuke to send message to Iran”
    Robert Mercer (Ashkenazic Jew) – $13.5 million
    Bernard Marcus (Ashkenazic Jew) – $7 million
    Linda McMahon (North European) – $7 million
    Geoffrey Palmer (Ashkenazic Jew) – $5 million
  • Ronald Cameron (North European) – $2 million
    Robert McNair (North European) – $2 million
    Stephen Feinberg (Ashkenazic Jew) – $1.5 million
    Peter Thiel (Ashkenazic Jew) – $1.2 million
    Walter Buckley, Jr. (North European) – $1 million

Top 10 Donors to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential Campaign

  • Haim & Cheryl Saban (Ashkenazic Jew) – $10 million
  • George Soros (Ashkenazic Jew) – $7 million
  • James Simons (Ashkenazic Jew) – $7 million
  • J.B. & Mary Kathryn Pritzker (Ashkenazic Jew) – $6.5 million
  • Donald Sussman (Ashkenazic Jew) – $4 million
  • Laure Woods (Ashkenazic Jew) – $3.3 million
  • Daniel Abraham (Ashkenazic Jew) – $3 million
  • Herbert Sandler (Ashkenazic Jew) – $2.5 million
  • David Shaw (Ashkenazic Jew) – $2.25 million
  • Henfy Laufer (Ashkenazic Jew) – $2 million

Former President Obama’s Chief of Staffs & Senior Advisors

  • Denis McDonough (Northern European) – Chief of Staff
  • Jacob “Jack” J. Lew (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chief of Staff
  • William M. Daley (White Gentile) – Former Chief of Staff
  • Rahm I. Emanuel (Ashkenazi Jew) – Former Chief of Staff
  • Nancy-Ann M. DeParle (Jewish spouse: Jason DeParle) – Deputy Chief of Staff
  • Alyssa Mastromonaco (Jewish spouse: David Krone) – Deputy Chief of Staff
  • Jim Messina (White Gentile) – Former Deputy Chief of Staff
  • Mona K. Sutphen (Ashkenazi Jew/African-American) – Former Deputy Chief of Staff
  • Valerie B. Jarrett [Bowman] (Ashkenazi Jew/African-American) – Senior Advisor
  • David Plouffe (Ashkenazi Jew) – Senior Advisor
  • David M. Axelrod (Ashkenazi Jew) – Former Senior Advisor
  • Peter M. Rouse (Ashkenazi Jew/Japanese) – Counselor to the President

 

Dual US/Israel Citizens Under Bush

These members have been predominantly responsible for abetting the “War on Terror”. All are Jews and all are dual citizens:

Michael Chertoff – (Homeland Security) co-author of the Patriot Act

Richard Perle – (Chairman Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board) expelled from Senator Henry Jackson’s office in the 70’s after the NSA caught him passing Highly-Classified documents to the Israeli Embassy. Pro-Iraq war fanatic.

Paul Wolfowitz – (Deputy Defense Secretary) was the number two leader within the administration behind the Iraq war mongering

Douglas Feith – (Under Secretary of Defense) is closely associated with the Zionist Organization of America, which even attacks Jews that don’t agree with its extremist views

Elliott Abrams – (National Security Council Advisor) played an important role in the Iran-Contra Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to fight Iraq

“Scooter” Libby – (Vice President Chief of Staff) was recently found guilty of lying to Federal investigators in the Valerie Plame affair, in which Plame, a covert CIA agent, was exposed for political revenge by the Bush administration following her husband’s revelations about the lies leading to the Iraq War.

Joshua Bolten – (White House Deputy Chief of Staff) accused Syria of having a nuclear program, so that they can attack Syria after Iraq

Ari Fleischer – (White House Spokesman) is closely connected to Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, who follow the Kabbalah, and hold very extremist and insulting views of non-Jews

Henry Kissinger – (Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board) responsible for wars that killed up to 6 million in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia during the 1970s

Eliot Cohen – (Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board) openly admitted his hatred of Islam claiming that Islam should be the enemy, not terrorism

David Frum – (Bush’s speechwriter) writer behind the “Axis of Evil” label. He lumped together all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war

Dov Zakheim – (foreign policy adviser) advocated the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern nations

Advertisements

Part II : Jews and the Libertarian Movement – Open Borders

by Alex Gore

Now I’ve discussed in Part I why free-market capitalism has benefited Jews. In this part I’m going to discuss how open border policies have benefited Jews. Some of this overlaps with my previous post – The Mises Institute and Open Borders. Jews have historically been overwhelmingly for open borders. Chapter 7 of Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique is a good read. There are five reasons I can think of why Jews are for open borders:

  1. Historically anti-semitic movements have occurred in a homogeneous society where people are of the same race, religion, or beliefs
  2. Jews feel more comfortable in a multicultural society and highly ethnocentric people, such as the Jews, tend to have an exaggerated perception of discrimination and racism. They often perceive it when none actually exists. I participate in libertarian message boards from time to time and you can usually spot the Jew by their reactions to criticisms. For example, there was an article on Mises on why the mainstream media was so bad. I responded as below:

Now me being a minority, I myself prefer to live in a multicultural society. Though I have conservative beliefs, I would much rather live in an area that is liberal and has a mixture of different races and background. I’m sure Jews feel the same way.

3. The mixing of races such as in interracial marriages is usually dysgenic and creates an increasing gap between the ruling class and their subjects

4. As “revenge” against the European people for past anti-semitic practices.

5. The destruction of culture and tradition that stands in the way of materialism, capitalism, and money-making opportunities for the Jewish banking and business elites.

But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity, unconnected with the conception of equality, which is negatived by the very laws of creation, for they have established subordination. With such a faith as this a people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon earth. This is the reason why it is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the mind of the “goyim” the very principle of god-head and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.

– The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Libertarian Christians such as Gary North has tried to justify usury and capitalism in the bible. In actuality, the only places in the bible where usury is justified is that of Jews to their enemies – the Gentiles. For instance, Deuteronomy 23:20

 

Now getting back to the original topic. As Brenton Sanderson illustrates in Free to Lose: Whites, Jews, and Libertarianism (Occidental Quarterly, Fall 2011), Jews have been hypocritically for open borders for the West but closed borders for Israel. Jewish libertarians are no exception:

(Milton) Friedman’s position with regard to immigration to the US was that, providing that immigrants (from whatever racial or cultural source) are entering the nation to take up employment, as opposed to state welfare, there is no rational reason to oppose that immigration . . . (However) the apparent attraction of non-discriminatory immigration for Friedman did not extend to the state of Israel. While Friedman frequently railed against the socialist tendencies of various Israeli governments, he was a strong supporter of the ethno-state of Israel, and there is no record of him ever noticing Israel’s racially-restrictive immigration policy — much less decrying it. This surely demonstrates that in such matters the ingroup moral criterion of whether it was “good for the Jews” surpassed his universal libertarian commitment to the supposed benefits of a free and open immigration policy.

Ayn Rand demonstrated an even greater capacity for hypocrisy with her attitude toward respective manifestations of White and Jewish ethnocentrism. She declared that “there is no such thing as a collective or racial achievement” and espoused the moral superiority of her type of individualism which “regards man — every man — as an independent, sovereign entity who possesses an inalienable right to his own life, a right derived from his nature as a rational being.” For Rand, however, “every man” ostensibly did not include the Arabs in their conflict with Israel. Instead she regarded the fight between Israel and the Arabs as fight  between civilized men and savages. Appearing on Donahue in 1979 she declared that: “If you mean whose side should you be on — Israel or the Arabs? I would certainly say Israel because it’s the advanced, technological, civilized country amidst a group of almost totally primitive savages who have not changed for years and who are racist and who resent Israel because it’s bringing industry and intelligence and modern technology into their stagnation.”

 

It’s no surprise that libertarians being overwhelmingly white and individualistic have a soft spot for open borders. They easily buy into the mainstream mantra that “race is only skin deep”. I’ve argued on the boards with libertarians on matters such as racial differences and open borders. They normally come across as either hostile or in complete denial. Libertarians for the most part are also clueless about an NWO conspiracy – let alone a JWO conspiracy.

Libertarians are usually against all authority including religious, parental, and of course the state which benefits the Jewish elites. I myself was a longtime libertarian but I’ve only recently discovered that I was being duped. Libertarians seldom point to any sort of ruling class, let alone a Jewish ruling class. The libertarian movement is essentially a giant gatekeeping operation that actually protects the establishment. They do this by misdirecting your attention towards blaming the government instead of those actually pulling the strings. The government is merely a tool that the establishment uses to enslave the masses. Take a look at the articles on the Mises website. The vast majority is just recycled mainstream media stuff disguised as promoting your freedom and liberty. The following are examples of their disinformation on race and immigration:

Migrants from Other States Are “Stealing Our Jobs”

The Economic Evil of Eugenics

The Racist History of Minimum Wage Laws

Though the three founders of the Austrian School of Economics were Gentile-Austrians, there’s little that’s Austrian about the Institute anymore. It should really be called the Jewish School of Economics:

Von Mises was funded by the Rockefellers.

Many readers may be surprised to learn the extent to which the Graduate Institute and then Mises himself in the years immediately after he came to United States were kept afloat financially through generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. In fact, for the first years of Mises’s life in the United States, before his appointment as a visiting professor in the Graduate School of Business Administration at New York University (NYU) in 1945, he was almost totally dependent on annual research grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. Even after he finally landed the position at NYU, where he remained only a visiting professor until his retirement in 1969, his salary was paid for not by NYU, but from funds contributed by generous private supporters.

Richard M. Ebeling of the Independent Review

The Rockefellers, by the way, are a Jewish family.

Part I : Jews and the Libertarian Movement – Capitalism

by Alex Gore

Libertarians in general are against the concept of government. I myself had been a big fan of the libertarian movement for many years. I’ve read a number of books by the Ludwig Von Mises Institute such as Man, Economy, and State by Murray Rothbard and Human Action by Ludwig Von Mises. I’ve also read Why Government Doesn’t Work by Harry Browne. However what I once supported has got me questioning major aspects of it. I now believe too much freedom is not really a good thing and there should be limits. Unlimited freedom ends up turning into despotism.

The one big issue that is almost never discussed among free-market capitalists and libertarians is that of RACE. And the fact that it is almost never discussed is the probably worst kept secret of libertarianism. Libertarians want to act like there is no such thing as race and like the mainstream they believe that race is just skin deep. The fact is, by discussing race realities, the whole foundation of libertarianism would actually crumble.

As I explained in my post, Jews and Multicultural Movement, there are actual genetic and biological differences among the races in terms of IQ, aggressiveness, propensity towards committing acts of violence, the treatment of those outside their race, and ethnocentricism. Blacks, Arabs, and Jews, to name a few, are considered ethnocentric – meaning they are cohesive and have a “brotherly” attachment to members of their own kind. They practice a “natural” socialism. These people’s ethnocentricism likely evolved through thousands of years of conflict with enemy groups in which strength in numbers was crucial to survival. I personally have visited a number of Arab countries, where in the markets all the shoe sellers would congregate in one area of the market and sell the same shoes for the same price. That’s the same for sellers of jewelry, clothing, produce, etc. Getting ahead of your competitors by, for example, undercutting is considered an offense. The attitude is that everyone should be on the same level.

Caucasians on the other hand evolved in the sparsely populated cold north where dealing with the climate was of more importance than dealing with tribal conflict. They have highly individualistic tendencies. They value personal achievements over group based ones. That’s a major reason why the standard of living is much higher in the West than most anywhere else. European-based people are natural born competitors. They don’t mind putting their fellow whites out of business (unless it was their neighbors of course). I would say they are natural born libertarians as well. Unfortunately their individualistic tendencies and relative compassion for outsiders mean they have little ethnic defense against strongly cohesive people. This is the paradox of libertarianism which stresses individualism. When it comes to conflict – group based strategies will almost always win out against individually based ones. That’s evident in the US which over the last 100 years has gone from a relatively free society to ones ruled by despots that has little in common with the citizens it rules. We essentially have a mafia that runs things. European-based people are able to be pushed around without fear of them fighting back. On the other hand, Middle Eastern societies, (both Arab and Jewish) with their strong ingroup-outgroup barriers, have done a far better job of containing unwanted elements than Western societies.

Now what does Jews have to do with libertarianism? And why are there so many prominent Jews in the libertarian movement (think Ludwig Von Mises, Milton Friedman, Murray Rothbard, Ayn Rand, and Stefan Molyneux)? Brenton Sanderson in The Occidental Quarterly (vol 11, no 3, Fall 2011) answers those questions in Free to Lose: Jews, Whites, and Libertarianism. Quoting Milton Friedman:

The feature of capitalism that has benefited the Jews has, of course, been competition. Wherever there is a monopoly, whether it be private or governmental, there is room for the application of arbitrary criteria in the selection of the beneficiaries of the monopoly—whether these criteria be color of skin, religion, national origin or what not. Where there is free competition, only performance counts. The market is color blind. No one who goes to the market to buy bread knows or cares whether the wheat was grown by a Jew, Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, or atheist; by Whites or blacks. Any miller who wishes to express his personal prejudices by buying only from preferred groups is at a competitive disadvantage, since he is keeping himself from buying from the cheapest source. He can express his prejudice, but he will have to do so at his own expense, accepting a lower monetary income than he could otherwise earn.

Sanderson further writes:

It may have occurred to the reader, however, that while Friedman, von Mises and Rand opposed the existence of monopolies that provided “room for the application of arbitrary criteria in the selection of the beneficiaries of the monopoly,” the reality is that Jews, even in the freest of markets, are notorious for developing and using ethnic monopolies in precisely this fashion. Indeed this is a major theme of (Kevin) MacDonald’s “A People That Shall Dwell Alone” where he observes that from “the standpoint of the group, it was always more important to maximize the resource flow from the non-Jewish community to the Jewish community, rather than to allow individual Jews to maximize their interests at the expense of the Jewish community.”

The massive extent of Jewish nepotism in their business dealings is so exhaustively documented (very frequently by Jews themselves) as to be beyond dispute. Such is the rarity of instances where Jews use other Jews in a purely instrumental manner that they are cause for great shock and trauma  within the Jewish community (witness the Madoff affair). Given this, it seems to me that while, as Friedman, von Mises and Rand assert, the free market may work efficiently to hinder ethnocentric discrimination among Whites (a group that MacDonald characterizes as, owing to their evolutionary history, strongly predisposed to individualism), the hyper-ethnocentrism of the Jews (and the Chinese) predispose them to transcend this “rational” discipline imposed by the free market.

It is clear from the domination of Jews in the media, the banking system, and the government, that the European based people cannot compete with them because the Jews (Ashkenazi) have a higher mean IQ and higher ethnocentricity. A free-market society that has both a highly ethnocentric and a highly intelligent minority will eventually be taken over by those people. I would say a purely free market may work in the long term if society was completely composed of members predisposed towards individualism. But even if a society was composed of nothing but individualists what is to stop some of them from forming a group with a goal of controlling society? The traits of cohesiveness, high intelligence, and feelings of superiority could slowly evolve with the practice of eugenics.

“You say that Marxism is the very antithesis of capitalism, which is equally sacred to us [The Money Power] It is precisely for this reason that they are direct opposites to one another, that they put into our hands the two poles of this planet and allow us to be its axis. These two contraries, like  Bolshevism and ourselves, find their identity in the International.”
– Otto Kahn, Investment Banker

Message me if you want a copy of the Sanderson article.

The Corrupt 9/11 “Truth” Movement

By Laura Hughes
From its very inception, the so called 9/11 truth movement, otherwise known as the people who say that George Bush and his cronies did 9/11, has been ultimately led and controlled by the same people that perpetrated the dastardly attacks. Of course after the Mossad/Jews blew up the twin towers and building 7, they allocated their controlled mainstream media the task of pinning all the blame on some rag tag, cave-dwelling, box cutter wielding Arabs known as Al Qaeda (i.e. the toilet). When even the uber brainwashed cattle, known as American citizens, started to have their doubts about this mindless fiction, the Jews panicked and reverted back to their tried and true method of “controlling the dissent”. The Jews launched a massive “9/11 conspiracy theory” campaign, with their operatives positioned firmly at the helm of the movement, ready to shift the blame onto anybody but Israel, Mossad, and the Jews.
Let us review several of the key figures in this ‘movement’ that are known disinformation agents who are intentionally or unintentionally, willingly or unwillingly, working for the Jews to further cover up the truth about who was really behind 9/11.
Alex Jones – Probably the most prominent figure in the so called 9/11 truth movement. Jones has produced many kosher certified, bottom feeding disinformation films such as: Terrorstorm, Endgame, and 9/11 road to Tyranny. These worthless films are kosher-approved because they never mention the Jews. On a radio broadcast he made in 2006, Alex Jones stated “folks, I’ve done the research, Israel could not carry out these [9/11] attacks.” Jones has several established connections that clearly illustrate whose side he is really on. First we have the accusation that his wife is indeed Jewish. This alone would explain his ferocious denial of the existence of the Jews and its machinations. Second, is the overwhelming fact that a majority of his sponsors are also Jews. Third is a startling discovery that he shares the same lawyer as Holly Bronfman Lev, the younger sister of Edgar Bronfman Jr, one of the most prominent Jew families in the world. Couple this with the self admission that he has “many Jewish friends in Hollywood”, alongside his heavy promotion by the mainstream media, he’s made appearances on Jewish controlled media outlets. It’s pretty much set in stone, Alex Jones is an agent of the Jews.
Jason Bermas – One of the more outspoken and prominent members of the Kosher 911 truth movement is so called “infowarrior”. This clown is a Jew and vehemently denies the existence of the Jews. Apparently it’s the “globalists” or the “Bilderberg Group”. Bermas is the pathetic pet protege of Alex Jones and was even given his own show by Alex Jones on GCN. Bermas is also the co-producer and researcher for the Loose Change Films which are blatant Jewish propaganda that don’t mention Israel, Mossad, or the Jews even once in any of the three films. These three films, which were made by Bermas in conjunction with the Jew Dylan Avery, were associated and promoted by a Jewess named Deborah Simon, who married into the billionaire Jewish Simon family of Minneapolis. The head of the family, Mel Simon, has had regular business dealings with Jews Larry Silverstein, and Frank Lowy, the two criminal WTC landlords who benefited tremendously from 9/11. Bermas and his kosher mentor, Alex Jones, have been exposed multiple times for running false or hoax stories on their websites and at no time did they attempt to confirm or validate the story. “Buy these new ring tones to help defeat the New World Order!” – Jason Bermas
Webster Tarpley has been a central figure in the Kosher truth movement, and wrote a book called 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in the USA. Tarpley is a firm supporter of the Kosher version of the truth which is that Bush & Cheney orchestrated 9/11; nary a mention does he make to Israel and the Jews in his work and writings. Tarpley has made numerous appearances on Jewish controlled mainsteam media networks CNN, FOX, and NBC. Getting on mainstream media is a clear sign that the Jews approve of his message.
Luke Rudkowski & We Are Change – One of the most publicized figures in the 9/11 truth movement has been Luke Rudkowski and his organization We Are Change, Rudkowski is a Jew who was one of the key figures that distracted the world for the past 4-5 years, by bull horning “9/11 was an inside job” all day long.
Harassing politicians about their attendance at Bilderberg Group meetings, this clown is known to ban people from his website who dare mention the Jews, and is a close associate of Alex Jones and Loose Change, both disinfo agents of the Jews, he fits right in. This Jewish controlled dissent power structure is composed of Alex Jones at the head with Loose Change & We Are Change as the two wings. Below them are the hordes of brainwashed fanboy minions who absorb anything the aforementioned shills can conjure, and then parrot this contrived malarkey to unsuspecting cattle. They will surely keep people distracted and transfixed on non-issues for years to come.
Mike Berger – This so called 9/11 truth activist is one of the key Jews who tried controlling the dissent from the very beginning. He is a member of the steering committee of the kosher 911truth.org website. Berger and his cronies have tried to steer people away from the evidence of Israeli/Jewish involvement in the attacks as well as the demolitions of the twin towers & Building 7. Berger was the guest on the Alex Jones show when Alex stated that Israel could not have carried out the attacks. Berger was heard chuckling in the background as this was being said. Berger was also a guest on the same CNN Showbiz Tonight episode as Webster Tarpley, and Alex Jones, discussing Charlie Sheen’s statements about 9/11.
Jon Gold – This Jewish so called “truth” activist is a member of the advisory board of the aforementioned 911truth.org and was also the co-founder of another kosher site — 911blogger.com. Jon Gold has been controlling the dissent for quite some time, drafting rules on what 9/11 truth should look like, as well as denying any role of Israel/Jews in 9/11. He announced his departure from 911blogger.com amidst ”too much discussion” of controlled demolitions being the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. He later silently returned under the the admin name “reprehenser” and later went on to attack this film vehemently on 911blogger.
Here is this Jewish controlled-dissent liar’s Youtube page:
Here is one other incident in history Jon ‘Gold’ and his Jewish cohorts don’t want you knowing about:
Jonathan Elinoff – This WeAreChange Colorado activist is the creator of a series of films called Core Of Corruption, so called documenting the global conspiracy. These films severely underplay the role of Israel/Jews in the 9/11 attacks, and don’t even mention 1/10th of the evidence documented on this website. This stuttering idiot admittedly comes from a Jewish family, and attacking anyone who targets the Jews as the criminal culprits of world crimes. Elinoff also went on to attack Missing Links and it’s creators with a barrage of nasty language to an unwitting supporter of his who started to ask why the evidence presented in Missing Links wasn’t mentioned in Core Of Corruption. He also writes pathetic damage control articles attacking Michael Collins Piper and his excellent book, Final Judgment, that proves the JFK assassination was a Jew/Mossad hit. He has strong associations with Alex Jones, and the Loose Change clan; at one time being the webmaster of their site.
Jim Marrs – Long time figure in “conspiracy” movement and popular author of numerous conspiracy books about everything from the JFK assassination to UFOs, secret societies, to 9/11. He is heavily promoted by operative Alex Jones, appearing on his radio show dozens of times to control the dissent. He also has made numerous appearances on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory. Marrs doesn’t dare veer off the 9/11 was an “inside job” narrative, and suffers from amnesia when it comes to the Jews. Nowhere in any of his work has he dedicated any time to discussing the issue. Marrs is the author of a ridiculous Jewish propaganda book called The Rise of the Fourth Reich, which promotes the ludicrous idea that the Nazis were not destroyed during WW II, but have been slowly gaining control of America since the wars end, by means of prominent families, secret societies, and financial institutions, with the goal of converting the world into their fascist empire. This book is the nail in the coffin for Marrs, clearly he is a tool helping to conceal the machinations of the Jews.
Dave Von Kleist – A somewhat prominent member of the 9/11 “truth” movement for the last 7-8 years, Von Kleist is completely and utterly kosher. His claim to fame is a 9/11 movie called In Plane Sight, which promotes the theory that President George Bush and his cronies are responsible for the attacks. His denial of the Jews achieves him the honor of being called an unwitting tool of the Jews.

Of course there are dozens more people who are wittingly or unwittingly working for or otherwise aiding the Jews to cover up the Israeli/Jewish 9/11 attack, but there are just too many to cover here.

“[The Israeli Mossad is] ruthless and cunning, with the capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian-Arab act.” -Report issued by the U.S. Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS); September 2001

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=829497397

Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industry

The following is a copy of an article that appeared in Jewish Quarterly. The site being frequently down, is the reason why I’m posting it here. Bolded text and photos are mine.


Nathan Abrams  |  Winter 2004  –  Number 196

A story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood’s seedier cousin, the adult film industry. Perhaps we’d prefer to pretend that the ‘triple-exthnics’ didn’t exist, but there’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews have played (and still continue to play) a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America. Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped to transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the ‘true blue Jews’.

Smut peddlers

Jewish activity in the porn industry divides into two (sometimes overlapping) groups: pornographers and performers. Though Jews make up only two per cent of the American population, they have been prominent in pornography. Many erotica dealers in the book trade between 1890 and 1940 were immigrant Jews of German origin. According to Jay A. Gertzman, author of Bookleggers and Smuthounds:The Trade in Erotica, 1920-1940(Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), ‘Jews were prominent in the distribution of gallantiana [fiction on erotic themes and books of dirty jokes and ballads], avant-garde sexually explicit novels, sex pulps, sexology, and flagitious materials’.

In the postwar era, America’s most notorious pornographer was Reuben Sturman, the ‘Walt Disney of Porn’. According to the US Department of Justice, throughout the 1970s Sturman controlled most of the pornography circulating in the country. Born in 1924, Sturman grew up in Cleveland’s East Side. Initially, he sold comics and magazines, but when he realized sex magazines produced twenty times the revenue of comic books, he moved exclusively into porn, eventually producing his own titles and setting up retail stores. By the end of the 1960s, Sturman ranked at the top of adult magazine distributors and by the mid-70s he owned over 200 adult bookstores. Sturman also introduced updated versions of the traditional peepshow booth (typically a dark room with a small colour TV on which the viewer can view X-rated videos). It was said that Sturman did not simply control the adult-entertainment industry; he was the industry. Eventually he was convicted of tax evasion and other crimes and died, disgraced, in prison in 1997. His son, David, continued running the family business.

The contemporary incarnation of Sturman is 43-year-old Jewish Clevelander Steven Hirsch, who has been described as ‘the Donald Trump of porno’. The link between the two is Steve’s father, Fred, who was a stockbroker-cum-lieutenant to Sturman. Today Hirsch runs the Vivid Entertainment Group, which has been called the Microsoft of the porn world, the top producer of ‘adult’ films in the US. His specialty was to import mainstream marketing techniques into the porn business. Indeed, Vivid parallels the Hollywood studio system of the 1930s and 1940s, particularly in its exclusive contracts to porn stars who are hired and moulded by Hirsch. Vivid was the subject of a behind-the-scenes reality TV show recently broadcast on Channel 4.

Nice Jewish girls and boys

Jews accounted for most of the leading male performers as well as a sizeable number of female stars in porn movies of the 1970s and ‘80s. The doyen of the Hebrew studs is Ron Jeremy. Known in the trade as ‘the Hedgehog’, Jeremy is one of America’s biggest porn stars. The 51-year-old Jeremy was raised in an upper-middle-class Jewish family in Flushing, Queens, and has since appeared in more than 1,600 adult movies, as well as directing over 100. Jeremy has achieved iconic status in America, a hero to males of all ages, Jewish and gentile alike – he’s the nebbischy, fat, hairy, ugly guy who gets to bed dozens of beautiful women. He presents an image of a modern-day King David, a Jewish superstud who supersedes the traditional heroes of Jewish lore. No sallow Talmud scholar he. His stature was recently cemented with the release of a pornomentary about his life, Porn Star: The Legend of Ron Jeremy. As probably the most famous Jewish male porn star, Jeremy has done wonders for the psyche of Jewish men in America. Jeremy has also just released a compilation CD, Bang-A-Long-With Ron Jeremy.For £7.99 (including delivery), the lucky listener gets to enjoy Jeremy’s hand-picked favourite porno grooves along with narration by ‘the legend’ himself. As the publicity blurb gushes, ‘Out of the brown paper wrappings and into the mainstream’.

Seymore Butts, aka Adam Glasser, is everything that Jeremy is not: young, handsome and toned. Glasser, a 39-year-old New York Jew, opened a gym in 1991 in Los Angeles. When no one joined, he borrowed a video camera for 24 hours, went to a nearby strip club, recruited a woman, then headed back to his gym and started shooting. Although the movie stank, with a bit of chutzpah and a few business cards he wangled a deal with a manufacturer and started cranking out films. Within a few years, ‘Seymore Butts’ – his nom de porn which is simultaneously his sales pitch – became one of the largest franchises in the adult-film business. As the king of the gonzo genre (marked by handheld cameras, the illusion of spontaneity and a low-tech aesthetic meant to suggest reality), he is today probably the most famous Jewish porn mogul. Seymore Inc., his production company, releases about 36 films annually, most of them shot for less than $15,000, each of them grossing more than 10 times that sum. Glasser employs 12 people, including his mother and cousin Stevie as respectively genial company accountant (and matchmaker for her single son) and lovable but roguish general gopher. Glasser currently even has his own reality TV show (also broadcast on Channel 4), a ten-episode docu-soap called Family Business, whose opening credits show Glasser’s barmitzvah photo.

In search of a buck

Jews became involved in the porn industry for much the same reasons that their co-religionists became involved in Hollywood. They were attracted to an industry primarily because it admitted them. Its newness meant that restrictive barriers had not yet been erected, as they had in so many other areas of American life. In porn, there was no discrimination against Jews. During the early part of the twentieth century, an entrepreneur did not require large sums of money to make a start in the film business; cinema was considered a passing fad. In the porn business, it was similarly straightforward to get going. To show ‘stag’ movies or loops, as they were known, all one needed was a projector, screen and a few chairs. Not tied up with the status quo and with nothing to lose by innovation, Jews were open to new ways of doing business. Gertzman explains that

“Jews, when they found themselves excluded from a field of endeavour, turned to a profession in which they sensed they could eventually thrive by cooperating with colleagues in a community of effort . . . Jews have for a very long time cultivated the temperament and talents of middlemen, and they are proud of these abilities”.

The adult entertainment business required something that Jews possessed in abundance:chutzpah. Early Jewish pornographers were marketing geniuses and ambitious entrepreneurs whose toughness, intelligence and boundless self-confidence were responsible for their successes.

Of course, the large number of Jews in porn were mainly motivated by the desire to make profits. Just as their counterparts in Hollywood provided a dream factory for Americans, a blank screen upon which the Jewish moguls’ visions of America could be created and projected, so the porn-moguls displayed a talent for understanding public tastes. What better way to provide the stuff of dreams and fantasies than through the adult-entertainment industry? Performers did porn for the money. As ADL National Director Abraham H. Foxman commented, ‘Those Jews who enter the pornography industry have done so as individuals pursuing the American dream.’

Secular sex

Like their mainstream counterparts, Jews who enter porn do not usually do so as representatives of their religious group. Most of the performers and pornographers are Jewish culturally but not religiously. Many are entirely secular, Jews in name only. Sturman, however, identified as a Jew – he was a generous donator to Jewish charities – and performer Richard Pacheco once interviewed to be a rabbinical student.

Very few, if any, porn films have overtly Jewish themes, although Jeremy once tried to get several Jewish porn stars together to make a kosher porn film. The exception is Debbie Duz Dishes, in which Nina Hartley plays a sexually insatiable Jewish housewife who enjoys sex with anyone who rings the doorbell. It has sold very well, spawned a couple of sequels and is currently very hard to buy – perhaps indicating a new niche to exploit. Indeed, according to an editorial on the World Union of Jewish Students website,

“there are thousands of people searching for Jewish porn. After things like Jewish calendar, Jewish singles, Jewish dating, and Jewish festivals comes ‘Jewish porn’ in the list of top search keywords that GoTo.com provide”.

Sexual rebels

Is there a deeper reason, beyond the mere financial, as to why Jews in particular have become involved in porn? There is surely an element of rebellion in Jewish X-rated involvement. Its very taboo and forbidden nature serves to make it attractive. As I written in these pages before, treyf signifies ‘the whole world of forbidden sexuality, the sexuality of the goyim, and there all the delights are imagined to lie . . .’ (‘Reel Kashrut: Jewish food in film’, JQ 189 [Spring 2003]).

According to one anonymous industry insider quoted by E. Michael Jones in the magazineCulture Wars (May 2003), ‘the leading male performers through the 1980s came from secular Jewish upbringings and the females from Roman Catholic day schools’. The standard porn scenario became as a result a Jewish fantasy of schtupping the Catholic shiksa.

Furthermore, as Orthodox Jew and porn gossipmonger Luke Ford explains on his website (lukeford.net): ‘Porn is just one expression of [the] rebellion against standards, against the disciplined life of obedience to Torah that marks a Jew living Judaism.’ It is also a revolt against (often middle-class) parents who wish their children to be lawyers, doctors and accountants. As performer Bobby Astyr put it on the same website, ‘It’s an “up yours” to the uncles with the pinky rings who got down on me as a kid for wanting to be musician.’

As religious influences waned and were replaced by secular ones, free-thinking Jews, especially those from California’s Bay Area, viewed sex as a means of personal and political liberation. America provided the freest society Jews have ever known, as manifested by the growth of the adult industry. Those Jewish women who have sex onscreen certainly stand in sharp contradiction to the stereotype of the ‘Jewish American Princess’. They (and I’m speculating here) may have seen themselves as fulfilling the promise of liberation, emancipating themselves from what feminist Betty Friedan in 1963 called the ‘comfortable concentration camp’ of the household as they set out into the Promised Land of the porno sets of Southern California. It signified their economic and social freedom: they were free to choose to enter, rather than coerced into it by economic and other circumstances. Once they had lain down, they could stand on their own two feet, particularly as female performers typically earn twice as much as their male counterparts.

Sexual revolutionaries

goldstein

Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having ‘to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an “up yours” to these people’. Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on lukeford.net), ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’ Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. Porn is no longer of the ‘what the Butler saw’ voyeuristic type; instead, it is driven to new extremes of portrayal that stretch the boundaries of the porn aesthetic. As new sexual positions are portrayed, the desire to shock (as well as entertain) seems clear.

It is a case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in America being channelled into sexual rather than leftist politics. Just as Jews have been disproportionately represented in radical movements over the years, so they are also disproportionately represented in the porn industry. Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction. Goodman wrote of the ‘beautiful cultural consequences’ that would follow from legalizing pornography: it would ‘ennoble all our art’ and ‘humanize sexuality’. Pacheco was one Jewish porn star who read Reich’s intellectual marriage of Freud and Marx (lukeford.net):

“Before I got my first part in an adult film, I went down to an audition for an X-rated film with my hair down to my ass, a copy of Wilhelm Reich’s Sexual Revolution under my arm and yelling about work, ‘love and sex’.”

As Rabbi Samuel H. Dresner put it (E. Michael Jones, ‘Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos’ Culture Wars, May 2003), ‘Jewish rebellion has broken out on several levels’, one being ‘the prominent role of Jews as advocates to sexual experimentation’. Overall, then, porn performers are a group of people who praise rebellion, self-fulfilment and promiscuity.

What are we ashamed of?

This brief overview and analysis of the role and motivations behind pornographers and performers is intended to shed light on a neglected topic in American Jewish popular culture. Little has been written about it. Books such as Howard M. Sachar’s A History of the Jews in America (New York: Knopf, 1992) simply ignore the topic. And you can bet that the 350th anniversary of the arrival of the Jews in the United States did not include any celebrations of Jewish innovation in this field. Even the usually tolerant Time Out New York has been too prim to deal with it, although the more iconoclastic Heeb plans an issue on it. In light of the relatively tolerant Jewish view of sex, why are we ashamed of the Jewish role in the porn industry? We might not like it, but the Jewish role in this field has been significant and it is about time it was written about seriously.

Nathan Abrams is a Lecturer in Modern American History at the University of Aberdeen. He has just completed a book on neo-conservatism in the United States.

Freud, Jews, and the Sexual Revolution

The following primarily comes from Chapter 4 of Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique Jewish Involvement in the Psychoanalytic Movement.

Cultural Subversion Through Sex

frued

 

Jewish organizations like the AJ Congress, and Jewish-dominated organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union have ridiculed Christian religious beliefs, attempted to undermine the public strength of Christianity, and have led the fight for unrestricted pornography. (MacDonald, 148)

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) is considered the father of psychoanalysis and is certainly among the most recognized names in the social sciences. He was born in the Austrian empire in what is now the Czech Republic. Freud grew up in an upper class Jewish family and was strongly attracted to Zionism. In one letter he even described himself as a “fanatical Jew” and believed that Jews were superior to Gentiles in terms of manners, intellect, morality, and family life.

[Freud] was convinced that it was in the very nature of psychoanalytic doctrine to appear shocking and subversive. On board ship to America he did not feel that he was bringing that country a new panacea. With his typically dry wit he told his traveling companions, ‘We are bringing them the plague.’” Freud like many Jewish intellectuals believed that it was their duty and mission to lead the world on a moral mission to cure society of it’s ills. (MacDonald, 106)

The field of psychoanalysis, which was founded by Freud, has been a mission of Gentile subversion through sex. In Freud’s upside down world good was bad and bad was good. The goals of psychoanalysis has been to thoroughly debunk traditional Gentile values and culture. Traditional moral values such as strong child-parents relations, high investment parenting, and delay of sex until marriage were derided as psychopathic behaviors while promiscuity, having children out of wedlock, single parenting, and general immorality were considered normal and healthy. Freud considered sexual morality as pathological and something to be destroyed. He propagated the idea that aggression in humans was a result of sexual suppression and that by overcoming this “suppression”, man can be led to an era of universal love and peace. During the first half of the 20th century Freud was frequently referred to as the father of sexual liberation and came under heavy criticisms from conservatives and the religious right.

(A) small, active minority can set the spiral of silence in motion. They become spokespeople to confuse and disorient the majority, make their own ideology mainstream, and ultimately start peddling what used to be bad as something good. – Gabrielle Kuby in The Global Sexual Revolution

Just as with multiculturalism and mass immigration, the goals of psychoanalysis has been that of breaking apart solidarity by inciting rebelliousness in children, eradicating religion, encouraging instant gratification, and fostering “radical” individualism. Though Freud, like many prominent Jews, advocated multiculturalism for the gentiles, they at the same time were against assimilation and mixed marriages for the Jewish people. None of Freud’s children married a gentile and none converted to Christianity.

Attack on the Church

Freud believed that the church got in the way of “rational” living. His attitude towards the Church is illustrated in Moses and Monotheism published in 1939:

(Anti-Semitism) is said to result from the fact that many Christians have become Christians only recently as the result of forced conversion from even more barbarically polytheistic folk religions than Christianity itself is. Because of the violence of their forced conversions, these barbarians “have not yet overcome their grudge against the new religion which was forced upon them, and they have projected it on to the source from which Christianity came to them [i.e., the Jews]

Freud’s theory of anti-Semitism in Moses and Monotheism (Freud 1939, 114-117) contains several assertions that anti-Semitism is fundamentally a pathological gentile reaction to Jewish ethical superiority. (MacDonald, 117)

Rothman and Isenberg (1974) convincingly argued that Freud viewed Interpretation of Dreams as a victory against the Catholic Church and that he saw Totem and Taboo as a successful attempt to analyze the Christian religion in terms of defense mechanisms and primitive drives. Regarding Totem and Taboo, Freud told a colleague that it would “serve to make a sharp division between us and all Aryan religiosity.” (MacDonald, 115)

Finding Sex Everywhere

Freud had the obsession of finding sex everywhere and attempted to argue that the emotions of parental affection and love was an unhealthy desire. He equated those feelings with sexual desires being denied. Freud even goes as far as equating high sexual morality among Gentiles as anti-semitic behavior:

Within this perspective, anti-Semitism results from the denial of sexuality, and the role of the Jewish mission of psychoanalysis was to end anti-Semitism by freeing humanity of its sexual repressions. (MacDonald, 113)

Through his twisted logic, neoconservative Jew, Norman Podheretz, stated that the road to Auschwitz would result if Westerners stopped accepting mass immigration. Wilhelm Reich propagated the same for those wanting to “repress” sexuality. “For (Wilhelm) Reich, the character armor that results ultimately from repressing sexual orgasms begins in civil discourse and ends at Auschwitz.” (MacDonald, 142)

In the Theory of the Oedipal complex, Freud advanced the idea that children are sexually attracted to their opposite sex parents, such as sons having fantasies about their mothers or daughters having fantasies of their fathers. However, incestuous relations seldom happen in the real world of human and animal behavior because those types of activities would eventually destroy the species through the introduction of genetic defects in offsprings. The theory also promoted the idea of sons desiring to kill their fathers, with the consequences being children without important father figures.

War on Gentiles

This conflation between sexual desire and love is also apparent in many of Freud’s psychoanalytic successors, including Norman O. Brown, Wilhelm Reich, and Herbert Marcuse. The common thread of these writings is that if society could somehow rid itself of sexual repressions, human relations could be based on love and affection. This is an extremely naive and socially destructive viewpoint, given the current research in the field. Psychoanalytic assertions to the contrary were never any more than speculations in the service of waging a war on gentile culture. (MacDonald, 123)

The deferring of gratification actually has a powerful evolutionary basis and has helped make the achievements of mankind possible. Responsibility, discipline, careful planning, and the delay of gratification are essential elements of human development. The goals of Jewish led movements in social sciences has been to condition Gentiles into being “subservient slaves”. Interestingly, the promotion of debauchery has mainly affected the lower class of people while the upper class has been relatively immune to it. The upper class and those with high IQ’s, which Jews mainly belong to, have been little affected.

(The War on Gentiles is) a war that has resulted in a society increasingly split between a disproportionately Jewish “cognitive elite” and a growing mass of individuals who are intellectually incompetent, irresponsible as parents, prone to requiring public assistance, and prone to criminal behavior, psychiatric disorders, and substance abuse. (MacDonald, 151) Studies have also found that Caucasians with poor parent-child relations have lower ethnocentricism scores than those with tight relations, exactly the results that was to be expected.

In The Function of the Orgasm: Sex-Economic Problems of Biological Energy, Wilhelm Reich (1961, 206-207; italics in text), a Jew, wrote, “the forces which had been kept in check for so long by the superficial veneer of good breeding and artificial self-control now borne by the very multitudes that were striving for freedom, broke through into action: In concentration camps, in the persecution of the Jews… In Fascism, the psychic mass disease revealed itself in an undisguised form.”

The apex of the association between Marxism and psychoanalysis came in the 1920s in the Soviet Union, where all the top psychoanalysts were Bolsheviks, Trotsky supporters, and among the most powerful political figures in the country. (Trotsky himself was an ardent enthusiast of psychoanalysis.) This group organized a government-sponsored State Psychoanalytical Institute and developed a program of “pedology” aimed at producing the “new Soviet man” on the basis of psychoanalytic principles applied to the education of children. The program, which encouraged sexual precocity in children, was put into practice in state-run schools. (MacDonald, 114)

The Jewish Domination of the Psychoanalytic Movement

History made psychoanalysis a “Jewish science.” It continued to be attacked as such. It was destroyed in Germany, Italy, and Austria and exiled to the four winds, as such. It continues even now to be perceived as such by enemies and friends alike. Of course there are by now distinguished analysts who are not Jews… But the vanguard of the movement over the last fifty years has remained predominantly Jewish as it was from the beginning. (Yerushalmi 1991, 98)

In 1906 all 17 members of the (psychoanalysis) movement were Jewish, and they strongly identified as Jews (Klein 1981). In a 1971 study, Henry, Sims and Spray found that 62.1 percent of their sample of American psychoanalysts identified themselves as having a Jewish cultural affinity, compared with only 16.7 percent indicating a Protestant affinity and 2.6 percent a Catholic affinity. An additional 18.6 percent indicated no cultural affinity, a percentage considerably higher than the other categories of mental health professional and suggesting that the percentage of psychoanalysts with a Jewish background was even higher than 62 percent (MacDonald, 106).

Freud’s estrangement from gentiles also involved positive views of Judaism and negative views of gentile culture, the latter viewed as something to be conquered in the interest of leading humanity to a higher moral level and ending anti-Semitism. Freud had a sense of “Jewish moral superiority to the injustices of an intolerant, inhumane—indeed, anti-Semitic—society.” (Klein 1981, 86)

Freud often made Gentiles highly visible in the movement, so that the disproportionately high numbers of Jews in the movement would not be as salient, especially if the goal was to subvert gentile culture and create a pacified population. Gentile colleagues who worked under Freud, some for many years, however often complained about their subservient status within the organizations.

No Scientific Basis For Psychoanalysis

The development of consensual theories consistent with observable reality but without any scientific content is a hallmark of twentieth-century Jewish intellectual movements. (MacDonald, 123)

Psychoanalysis is regarded as a pseudo science with little scientific basis. MacDonald argues that the teachings of social “sciences” over the past century are not real sciences but Judaized political movements made to resemble science. Real science demands independence and objectivity with no attachments to ideology or strong authoritative “father” figures. Real science demands that previous theories and ideas be modified or abandoned when new data comes along to challenge it. Oddly, Freud’s works such as Studies of Hysteria and The Interpretation of Dreams are over a 100 years old, yet are still treated as standard references in the field of social sciences:

The continued use of Freud’s texts in instruction and the continuing references to Freud’s work are simply not conceivable in a real science. In this regard, although Darwin is venerated for his scientific work as the founder of the modern science of evolutionary biology, studies in evolutionary biology only infrequently refer to Darwin’s writings because the field has moved so far beyond his work. On the Origin of Species and Darwin’s other works are important texts in the history of science, but they are not used for current instruction. Moreover, central features of Darwin’s account, such as his views on inheritance, have been completely rejected by modern workers. With Freud, however, there is continuing fealty to the master, at least within an important subset of the movement. (MacDonald, 130)

What passes today for Freud bashing is simply the long-postponed exposure of Freudian ideas to the same standards of noncontradiction, clarity, testability, cogency, and parsimonious explanatory power that prevail in empirical discourse at large. Step by step, we are learning that Freud has been the most overrated figure in the entire history of science and medicine— one who wrought immense harm through the propagation of false etiologies, mistaken diagnoses, and fruitless lines of inquiry. Still the legend dies hard, and those who challenge it continue to be greeted like rabid dogs. (Crews et al. 1995, 298-299)

Whereas real science is individualistic at its core, psychoanalysis in all its manifestations is fundamentally a set of cohesive, authoritarian groups centered around a charismatic leader. (MacDonald, 132)

The workings of the (Psychoanalytic) Committee have been extensively documented by Grosskurth (1991, 15; italics in text) who notes that “By insisting the Committee must be absolutely secret, Freud enshrined the principle of confidentiality. The various psychoanalytic societies that emerged from the Committee were like Communist cells, in which the members vowed eternal obedience to their leader. Psychoanalysis became institutionalized by the founding of journals and the training of candidates; in short an extraordinarily effective political entity.” (MacDonald, 128)

There were repeated admonitions for the Committee to present a “united front” against all opposition, for “maintaining control over the whole organization,” for “keeping the troops in line,” and for “reporting to the commander” (Grosskurth 1991, 97). This is not the workings of a scientific organization, but rather of an authoritarian religious-political and quasi-military movement—something resembling the Spanish Inquisition or Stalinism far more than anything resembling what we usually think of as science. (MacDonald, 128)

The continued life of these notions within the psychoanalytic community testifies to the vitality of psychoanalysis as a political movement. The continued self-imposed separation of psychoanalysis from the mainstream science of developmental psychology, as indicated by separate organizations, separate journals, and a largely non-overlapping membership, is a further indication that the fundamental structure of psychoanalysis as a closed intellectual movement continues into the present era. Indeed, the self-segregation of psychoanalysis conforms well to the traditional structure of Judaism vis-à-vis gentile society: There is the development of parallel universes of discourse on human psychology—two incompatible worldviews quite analogous to the differences in religious discourse that have separated Jews from their gentile neighbors over the ages. (MacDonald, 124)

In the world of science, controversy leads to experimentation and rational argumentation. In the world of psychoanalysis, it leads to expulsion of the nonorthodox and to splendid isolation from scientific psychology. (MacDonald, 130)

Despite the paper thin arguments put out by Freud and the lack of scientific evidence, he continues to be treated with cult-like status among his peers.

Conclusion

Psychoanalysis, like many movements that are Jewish-dominated, is that of intentional Gentile cultural debasement. As part of a group evolutionary strategy, while Jews themselves engage in high-investment parenting and group cohesion, they have been engaged in promoting the opposite for Gentiles. It represents yet another battle in the Jew vs Gentile war that has been ongoing since at least biblical times.

Jews and the Subversion of Anthropology

boas

(This post is in reference to Chapter 2 of Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald and is a continuation from “Jews and the Multicultural Movement” posted a week ago.)

Observers have noted radical changes in the social sciences upon entry of Jews into the field. Franz Boas (1858-1942) is considered the “Father of Anthropology”. He was strongly aware of his Jewish identity and was intensely committed to fighting anti-semitism. During the early 20th century, Boas in his fight against discrimination, essentially transformed the school of anthropology from one that studied the relationship between evolution and race to one that completely removed the concept of race. By doing this he also transformed what used to be a respectable science into an ideological movement. Post-Boas, variations in behavior among races was attributed almost solely to “culture” and the direct environment. Darwinism was suppressed.

Boas engaged in a “life-long assault on the idea that race was a primary source of the differences to be found in the mental or social capabilities of human groups. He accomplished his mission largely through his ceaseless, almost relentless articulation of the concept of culture”. “Boas, almost single-handedly, developed in America the concept of culture, which, like a powerful solvent, would in time expunge race from the literature of social science”. (MacDonald, C of C, 22)

Boas rarely cited works of people outside his group except to disparage them, whereas, as with Mead’s and Benedict’s work, he strenuously promoted and cited the work of people within the ingroup. The Boasian school of anthropology thus came to resemble in a microcosm key features of Judaism as a highly collectivist group evolutionary strategy: a high level of ingroup identification, exclusionary policies, and cohesiveness in pursuit of common interests. (MacDonald,  26)

Many scientists consider Boas a fraud:

Although Boas made his conjectures in a very dogmatic manner, his“historical reconstructions are inferences, guesses, and unsupported assertions [ranging] from the possible to the preposterous. Almost none is verifiable” (White 1966, 13).

Israel Ehrenberg (Ashley Montagu), who was a student of Boas, once quipped,“if you are brought up a Jew, you know that all non-Jews are anti-Semitic… I think it is a good working hypothesis” (Shipman, 1994, 166). Of course he, like many Jews, rarely suggest that their own behavior may in fact be the cause of anti-semitism. Ehrenberg worked tirelessly to promote the idea that race was a myth. The result of racial de-emphasis and assertions of “we are all the same inside” is that Jews as a whole will not be singled out:

The expectation is that individualists will tend to be less predisposed to anti-Semitism and more likely to blame any offensive Jewish behavior as resulting from transgressions by individual Jews rather than stereotypically true of all Jews. However Jews, as members of a collectivist subculture living in an individualistic society, are themselves more likely to view the Jewish-gentile distinction as extremely salient and to develop stereotypically negative views about gentiles. (MacDonald,  166)

Jewish led movements in social science has essentially been that of “anti-science”. Unlike hard science, such as what Jewish physicist Albert Einstein practiced, social sciences had been rift with uses of unscientific methods to advance group interest:

(The) issues of the ethnic identification and even ethnic activism on the part of people like Einstein are entirely separate from the issue of whether such people viewed the content of the theories themselves as furthering ethnic interests, and, in the case of Einstein, there is no evidence that he did so. The same cannot be said for Freud, the New York Intellectuals, the Boasians, and the Frankfurt School, in which “scientific” theories were fashioned and deployed to advance ethnic group interests. This ideological purpose becomes clear when the unscientific nature of these movements is understood. Much of the discussion in CofC documented the intellectual dishonesty, the lack of empirical rigor, the obvious political and ethnic motivation, the expulsion of dissenters, the collusion among co-ethnics to dominate intellectual discourse, and the general lack of scientific spirit that pervaded them. In my view, the scientific weakness of these movements is evidence of their group-strategic function. (MacDonald,  vii)

Anthropology had become Jewish dominated during the past century:

By 1915 the Boasians controlled the American Anthropological Association and held a two-thirds majority on its Executive Board (Stocking 1968, 285). In 1919 Boas could state that “most of the anthropological work done at the present time in the United States” was done by his students at Columbia (in Stocking 1968, 296). By 1926 every major department of anthropology was headed by Boas’s students, the majority of whom were Jewish. (MacDonald,  25)

MacDonald discloses that the result of this is that by the mid-20th century, educated Americans could assert that “modern science has shown that all human races are equal.” Real science, however, has shown that there are differences among races in terms of IQ, ethnocentricity, xenophobia, aggression, instant gratification, sex drive, thinking in logic, and even in the treatment of animals. The continuation of the study of anthropology with respect to race and evolution was unfeasible from the standpoint of Jews because of the fear that they would eventually be exposed. It would then become known that the high IQ’s of Ashkenazi Jews and their tendencies to form kinship based networks have, at least in part, been responsible for their dominance in key areas such as media, banking, and domestic and foreign policy making.

The shifts in anthropology was not relegated to the US. Madison Grant who authored in 1921, The Passing of the Great Race, written “it is well-nigh impossible to publish in the American newspapers any reflection upon certain religions or races which are hysterically sensitive even when mentioned by name. The underlying idea seems to be that if publication can be suppressed the facts themselves will ultimately disappear. Abroad, conditions are fully as bad, and we have the authority of one of the most eminent anthropologists in France that the collection of anthropological measurements and data among French recruits at the outbreak of the Great War was prevented by Jewish influence, which aimed to suppress any suggestion of racial differentiation in France”.

Levi-Strauss

Portrait de l'ecrivain Claude Levi Strauss. © Effigie/ Leemage

Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908-2009), was a French anthropologist with a strong sense of Jewish belonging and a colleague of Boas. He too rejected biological and evolutionary theories and believed that cultures, like languages, had no real relationship to ethnicity. He believed that the roles of the anthropologist was to be “a natural subversive”.

Levi-Strauss’s most significant works were all published during the breakup of the French colonial empire and contributed enormously to the way it was understood by intellectuals… [H]is elegant writings worked an aesthetic transformation on his readers, who were subtly made to feel ashamed to be Europeans… [H]e evoked the beauty, dignity, and irreducible strangeness of Third World cultures that were simply trying to preserve their difference… [H]is writings would soon feed the suspicion among the new left… that all the universal ideas to which Europe claimed allegiance—reason, science, progress, liberal democracy—were culturally specific weapons fashioned to rob the non-European Other of his difference. (Lilla 1998, 37)

Gould

gould

Another Jew, Steven Jay Gould who written, The Mismeasure of Man, during the early 1980s attempted to debunk the relationship between brain size and IQ. Gould presents himself as an expert on evolution and is widely respected among those who know little about biology. But among biologists, Gould is considered a fraud. Evolutionary biologist John Maynard Smith refers to him as “a man whose ideas are so confused as to be hardly worth bothering with”. Browse through some of Amazon’s One-Star reviews of The Mismeasure of Man.

Conclusion
Over the past half-century, the goals of organized Jewry is to have Judaism perceived as just “another religion”. This has allowed Jews to more easily pursue group-based goals at the expense of others:

The downgrading of the ethnic aspect of Judaism essentially allowed Jews to win the ethnic war without anyone even being able to acknowledge that it was an ethnic war. (MacDonald, xxii)

Coming Up: Freud and the Sexual Revolution – Follow my blog to get the latest update.

Jews and the Multicultural Movement

In Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald explains that the programs of multiculturalism, mass immigration, and political correctness are not something that happened by accident but has long been part of Jewish led movements. Jews have historically taken part in movements that have undermined cohesion, religion, tradition, and national identity. MacDonald is a retired professor of psychology at California State University-Long Beach. He has written several books on Jewish anthropology but C of C is considered his most important work.

At the intellectual level, Jewish intellectuals led the battle against the idea that races even exist and against the idea that there are differences in intelligence or cultural level between the races that are rooted in biology. They also spearheaded defining America as a set of abstract principles rather than an ethnocultural civilization. At the level of politics, Jewish organizations spearheaded the drive to open up immigration to all of the peoples of the world. Jewish organizations also played a key role in furthering the interests of other racial and ethnic minorities, and they led the legal and legislative effort to remove Christianity from public places. (MacDonald, C of C, page xx)

Ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interests because Jews become one of many ethnic groups. This results in the diffusion of political and cultural influence among the various ethnic and religious groups, and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified, cohesive groups of gentiles united in their opposition to Judaism. We have seen that historically, major anti-Semitic movements have tended to erupt in societies that have been, apart from the Jews, religiously or ethnically homogeneous. Ethnically and religiously pluralistic societies are thus more likely to satisfy Jewish interests than are societies characterized by ethnic and religious homogeneity among gentiles. (MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents, p332)

American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of U.S. Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.” (MacDonald, C of C, pg 85)

The results of these movements have been:

  1. A reduction in discrimination and anti-semitism
  2. A society that has made it easier for minority groups to thrive and prosper without fear of backlash
  3. A society that mainly views offending behaviors as individual characteristics rather than a characteristic of the entire group.
  4. A society that sees criticisms of groups being based on prejudice and hate rather than as caused by behavioral characteristics of that group.

MacDonald considers Judaism as a “group evolutionary strategy”. The group that possesses the most intelligence, the most in-group cooperation, the best strategy for eliminating competition, a high amount of motivation, and a long-term vision eventually wins out. What the West has been caught up in is essentially an ethnic war invisible to most. MacDonald describes an elite “that almost instinctively loathes the traditional institutions of European-American culture: its religion, its customs, its manners, and its sexual attitudes”, thus the title of the book.

ETHNOCENTRISM

Jews have high ethnocentricity. Ethnocentric people are cohesive and have strong ties to family and community. Group goals are emphasized over individual goals. Ethnocentric people are very protective of their own kind and view criticisms of individuals or their leaders as an attack on their entire race. Ethnocentric societies are typically collectivist and strong authoritarian leadership is valued. Ethnocentricity likely evolved as a defense mechanism against invasion from enemy groups over territory and resources. They evolved where conflicts with neighbors and other tribal groups were common. Cooperation among peers was of prime importance as peers joined together to fight for a common cause. Endogamous marriages tightened bonds and cohesiveness. The ingroup-outgroup barrier among is strong and difficult to penetrate. Blacks and Arabs have relatively high degrees of ethnocentricity as well.

On the other hand Caucasians, particularly those of northern European decent, have relatively low levels of ethnocentricity. They tend to be individualistic, independent, self-reliant, and have little in the way of “brotherly” attachment to people of their own kind. They have more positive attitudes to outsiders. Caucasians highly value strong individual rights and egalitarian forms of government. Ingroup-outgroup barriers among Caucasians are weak and permeable. Individual, not group goals, are paramount. It is theorized that Caucasians evolved as hunters in the cold harsh north with relatively little contact with others. Dealing with the physical environment was more of a concern than dealing with rival enemy groups. MacDonald discloses that the Caucasian features of “individualism, relative lack of ethnocentrism, and concomitant moral universalism” are all features that are “entirely foreign to Judaism”.

ethno

European groups are highly vulnerable to invasion by strongly collectivist, ethnocentric groups because individualists have less powerful defenses against such groups.(MacDonald, C of C, pg xxiii)

While strong collectivist groups tend to thrive in highly individualistic societies, they have difficulty penetrating societies that have strong ingroup-outgroup barriers such as Islamic societies. Short of military invasion, cohesive societies have been much more successful in keeping predatory groups on the outside looking in.

Collectivist cultures [like Judaism]… place a much greater emphasis on the goals and needs of the ingroup rather than on individual rights and interests. Collectivist cultures develop an “unquestioned attachment” to the ingroup, including “the perception that ingroup norms are universally valid (a form of ethnocentrism), automatic obedience to ingroup authorities, and willingness to fight and die for the ingroup. These characteristics are usually associated with distrust of and unwillingness to cooperate with outgroups.” In collectivist cultures morality is conceptualized as that which benefits the group, and aggression and exploitation of outgroups are acceptable. (MacDonald, C of C, pg 165)

Europeans are groups with high levels of cooperation with strangers rather than with extended family members, and are prone to market relations and individualism. This suggests the fascinating possibility that the key for a group intending to turn Europeans against themselves is to trigger their strong tendency toward altruistic punishment by convincing them of the evil of their own people. Because Europeans are individualists at heart, they readily rise up in moral anger against their own people once they are seen as free riders and therefore morally blameworthy—a manifestation of their much stronger tendency toward altruistic punishment deriving from their evolutionary past as hunter gatherers. (MacDonald, C of C, pg Xxviii)

Democracy is conceptualized as guaranteeing that majorities will not resist the expansion of power of minorities even if that means a decline in their own power. Viewed at its most abstract level, a fundamental agenda is thus to influence the European-derived peoples of the United States to view concern about their own demographic and cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of psychopathology. (MacDonald, C of C, pg 196)

IMMIGRATION

 Jews have been “the single most persistent pressure group favoring a liberal immigration policy” in the United States in the entire immigration debate beginning in 1881. (Neuringer 1971, 392-393)

Attitudes about race have changed tremendously over the years. What was considered normal discussion in the past is completely taboo today. A century ago people believed that there were inherent differences in intelligence and morality among the races. Some even believed that certain races were intent on dominating others. Early Americans, whom were largely WASPs (white anglo-saxon protestants), felt it was a God given right for homogeneity in America to be maintained. Since they made the largest contribution to the development of the country, they believed they had every right to determine the direction of it. They believed things were fine the way they were and saw no need for radical changes. The sort of immigration that was to be permitted should only be limited to those of their own kind. Even immigration of Italians, Irish, and Eastern Europeans, though white, were looked upon with suspicion as they could be a threat to the general order of things. Protecting one’s kind is actually a fundamental part of evolution to avoiding extinction.

Immigration policy is a paradigmatic example of conflicts of interest between ethnic groups because immigration policy determines the future demographic composition of the nation. Ethnic groups unable to influence immigration policy in their own interests will eventually be displaced by groups able to accomplish this goal. Immigration policy is thus of fundamental interest to an evolutionist. (MacDonald, C of C, pg 240)

Jewish groups were virtually alone in it’s support of the 1924 immigration bill (failed) and 1965 immigration bill (passed). The 1965 bill essentially gave the green light for mass immigration to America that continues to this day. Groups such as the American Jewish Committee, placed emphasis that immigration was to be based not on needed skill or talent but on family reunion. Immigration was to be opened up to all peoples of the world on a first-come first-served basis. Milton Konwitz of Cornell – “To place so much emphasis on technological and vocational qualifications is to remove every vestige of humanitarianism from our immigration policy.”

The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever. (Raab 1993b, 23)

What is interesting is that Jews tend to have double standards when it comes to these programs. While prominent Jews like George Soros, David Horowitz, and Ayn Rand supported liberal immigration policies and multiculturalism for America and Europe, they were staunchly against those same programs for Israel. Dedicated Jews are generally against assimilation and mixed marriages for their people. Kaufman Kohler, a Reform intellectual, remarked that “Israel must remain separate and avoid intermarriage until it leads humankind to an era of universal peace and brotherhood among the races.

 Jews have consistently advocated an internationalist foreign policy because “an internationally-minded America was likely to be more sensitive to the problems of foreign Jewries” (MacDonald, C of C, pg 241)

Equating immigration restriction with genocide

 Walter Benjamin (1968, 262) notes, “Hatred and [the] spirit of sacrifice . . . are nourished by the image of enslaved ancestors rather than that of liberated grandchildren.” This is important because whatever one’s attitudes about the costs and benefits of immigration, a principal motivation for encouraging massive non-European immigration on the part of the organized Jewish community has involved a deeply felt animosity toward the people and culture responsible for the immigration restriction of 1924–1965. (MacDonald, C of C, pg x).

The plight of Jews in Europe during WWII has at least in part been blamed on the failed 1924 immigration act. Norman Podhoretz, an editor for Commentary magazine, is an example of the type of logic that many Jews employ to justify the programs they promote. The following two passages are from Understanding Jewish Influences also by the same author:

“My own view is that what had befallen the Jews of Europe inculcated a subliminal lesson…. The lesson was that anti-Semitism, even the relatively harmless genteel variety that enforced quotas against Jewish students or kept their parents from joining fashionable clubs or getting jobs in prestigious Wall Street law firms, could end in mass murder.”

And Jewish conservative, Lawrence Auster: “Now when Jews put together the idea that “all social prejudice and exclusion leads potentially to Auschwitz” with the idea that “all bigotry is indivisible,” they must reach the conclusion that any exclusion of any group, no matter how alien it may be to the host society, is a potential Auschwitz. So there it is. We have identified the core Jewish conviction that makes Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration, even the mass immigration of their deadliest enemies. In the thought-process of Jews, to keep Jew-hating Muslims out of America would be tantamount to preparing the way to another Jewish Holocaust.”

CIVIL RIGHTS

Jews have heavily influenced civil rights organizations such as the NAACP, SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center), ADL, ACLU, SCLC (Southern Christian Leadership Conference), and LCCR (Leadership Conference on Civil Rights). Howard Sachar writes in A History of Jews in America that “In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi Stephen Wise.”Additional Jewish-American founding members included Julius Rosenwald, Lillian Wald, and Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch. Wikipedia states that every president of the NAACP from 1915 to 1975 was Jewish. It is notable that Marcus Garvey, who is black, quit the NAACP in 1917 calling it a “white organization.” Between two-thirds and three-quarters of the funding for civil rights groups during the 1960s, the height of the civil rights movement, were by Jews.

 Jewish organizations view Anglo-Saxon (read Caucasian) nationalism as their greatest potential threat and they have tended to support pro-black integration (i.e., assimilationist, individualist) policies for blacks in America, presumably because such policies dilute Caucasian power and lessen the possibility of a cohesive, nationalist anti-Semitic Caucasian majority. (Harold Wright Cruse, black intellectual and author of The Crisis of the Negro Intellect)

Cruse notes that while Jews have been active in black civil rights organizations, the other way around has not been true. Blacks have been completely excluded from the inner workings and policy making of Jewish organizations.

kiwi-kaplan-martin-luther-king-jews-blacks-anc-275 mandela-slovo-jews-blacks-anc-275

Kiwi Kaplan – Martin Luther King   Nelson Mandela – Joe Slovo

 

SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY

As part of an evolutionary strategy, the successful advancement of your kind requires your kind to be portrayed in a positive light and outsiders in a less than positive light. This is not something exclusive to Jews but Jews have been the most successful with this. Hitler attempted to practice this for the German people.

Levinson views ethnocentrism as fundamentally concerned with ingroup-outgroup perceptions, a perspective that is congruent with social identity theory that I have proposed as the best candidate for developing a theory of anti-Semitism. Levinson concludes, “Ethnocentrism is based on a pervasive and rigid ingroup-outgroup distinction; it involves stereotyped negative imagery and hostile attitudes regarding outgroups, stereotyped positive imagery and submissive attitudes regarding ingroups, and a hierarchical, authoritarian view of group interaction in which ingroups are rightly dominant, outgroups subordinate” (MacDonald, C of C, pg 171)

What organized Jewry has accomplished is something that shouldn’t necessarily be viewed as out of the ordinary. They are simply looking out for themselves. This has helped Judaism survive for 2000 plus years despite Jews being almost always a diaspora group among gentiles. Besides battling anti-semitism, the author provides extensive evidence that multiculturalism is of intentional gentile cultural subversion.

Jewish moral particularism combined with a profound sense of historical grievancehatred by any other name—against European civilization and a desire for the end of Europe as a Christian civilization with its traditional ethnic base. According to the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the menaces of “extremism, hate and fundamentalism”—prototypically against Jews—can only be repaired by jettisoning the traditional cultural and ethnic basis of European civilization. Events that happened five hundred years ago are still fresh in the minds of Jewish activists. (MacDonald, Understanding Jewish Influences, p10).

CONCLUSION

Jews know how to play the evolutionary game. Gentiles, particularly Caucasians, do not. The group that is the smartest, the most cunning, and the most patient eventually wins out. Multiculturalism is yet another battle of the many battles fought between Jews and Gentiles that date back to at least biblical times and has continued up into the present day.

(I will do a writeup of Chapters 2, 3, and 4 in the near future. There is too much information to put in one article)

 – Alex Gore


Highlights:

9:30 – If you don’t play the evolutionary game and decide to sit out, you will lose
28:00 – Taboo of C of C
44:30 – Ford’s conversion from Christianity to orthodox Judaism and what he discovered

Why Are Jews So Successful?

jews

Many wonder why are there so many Jews occupying high-level government, university, banking, and media positions. They make up just two percent of the US population. There must be something going on, right? Kevin MacDonald explains this in his book, Understanding Jewish Influences. My particular focus is on Ashkenazi Jews who make up the majority of Jews in the US. While the Jew’s high levels of intelligence is something that many of us are aware, the concept of ethnocentricity is something most of us are not familiar with. Understanding both of these things are crucial to understanding how those people, whom make up just 2 percent of the American population, are able to dominate so many high ranking positions in society.

(more…)

the real Syrian Free Press

War Press Info ~ Archive of Most Important Reliable Global War News

The Holocaust is a Hoax

Time to expose the lies!

The Rabbit Hole

Denying the truth doesn't change the facts.

Levant Report

the Real Middle East, debunking the sound bites

Mothman777's Blog

Perfect nutrition in spiritual context