Profiles of the Truth Movement

All the ones below discusses the Jewish Question extensively. This is not meant to be an exhaustive compilation. I’m only referring to those who I have some familiarity with. Since I already discussed Kyle Hunt and Renegade Tribune in an earlier post, I don’t feel it is necessary to discuss them again. I’ll start with those who I feel are the most authentic.

PMTMR/Jim How

PMTMR was a former youtube personality that disappeared from the scene about a year and a half ago. I feel there was no person that was more honest and more sincere about exposing the establishment than him. Though there were things he got incorrect (particularly the bible and Judaeo-Christianity) he was spot on when it came to the really big picture. PMTMR’s specialty was the Holocaust, WWII, and Hitler. He was the only one I knew who attempted to portray reality by showing real footage of mutilated bodies and torture camps of Abu Graibe and the ones during WWII. PMTMR wanted to show the way things actually are. He exposes stuff you rarely see elsewhere. PMTMR knows not everything is purely black and white and does not paint it as such. He sees a lot of grey areas and often discusses both sides of a story, something most don’t bother doing.

Verdict: uncontrolled

Mike Stathis

Mike Stathis runs AVA investment research. He is the only person I know who actually exposes how the alternative media and controlled opposition works. He presents his material in a completely different manner than most all. Instead of just presenting information, Stathis presents things in an educational manner in an attempt to get you to think beyond the rhetoric. He really exposes the money-making scheme of the gold pumpers and doom and gloomers. While I have not subscribed to Stathis’ services, I have watched a number of his videos on youtube (a lot has been taken down though) and I believe I have gotten a pretty good gist of what he is about.

Verdict: uncontrolled

Right Wing Universe

Was kicked off youtube about a year ago but has a bitchute channel now. Discusses the Jewish Question in length and covers many topics and aspects of it – particularly WWII. Right Wing Universe is a bookworm. He is white nationalist and can be quite polarizing. Right Wing Universe presents things in an educational manner and has a calm approach. Is not as dogmatic as you think. Like PMTMR he presents much of his stuff taking both sides of an argument into account. As far as I can tell Mr Universe is not controlled.

Verdict: probably uncontrolled

Digger for Truth

Digger for Truth was among the few that proposed actual solutions to our problems and was NOT a white nationalist. He contributed to Renegade Tribune and had his own blog. While Digger was against mass third world immigration to the West and was against the darkening of the white race, Digger realized that ALL Gentiles were under attack. He knew that we were all in this fight together. Digger has disappeared from the scene a couple of years ago and nothing has been heard about him since. Yes, he got a few things wrong and himself did not realize the full extent of controlled opposition. But like PMTMR, he did get the big big picture of what the establishment was all about.

Verdict: uncontrolled

Scott Roberts

There is a lot of similarities between Scott Roberts and PMTMR. Though Roberts is a hard hitting guy who knows who the enemies are, he promotes a high amount of polarization. Roberts is very one-sided and unlike PMTMR he paints the entire picture of reality as black and white. In one video Roberts discusses the slave trade and said that it was the blacks who benefited the most from it (because they have been infinitely better off in America rather than living in grinding poverty back in Africa). He said the sole purpose of the slave trade was to genocide the whites. That may have been one of the reasons but just as big of a reason was simply the exploitation of cheap labor. Jews have always been shrewd businessmen. Roberts says it is only the whites who are under attack, without acknowledging the Jewish genocide campaign against the other races races such as the Arabs, Africans, and Asians over the years. As said just above the fact is ALL gentiles are under attack. Roberts like so many tells you (whites) what you want to hear. As far as I know, Roberts has not acknowledged PMTMR even though PMTMR has acknowledged Roberts. When PMTMR disappeared, Roberts made no mention of it. Also he’s been known to hook up with Mike Delaney and Andrew Anglin, both of whom are suspect.

Roberts is more of a rally-er and presents little in the way of educating the audience. Roberts shows both his face and tells his name (whether real or made up does not matter) which makes me think that nobody is going after him. He has been interviewed by Renegade at least once and had a number of his stuff posted on their site (though there appears to have been a recent fallout). Red Ice interviewed him several years back and the video got over 50k views. Yes Roberts has a small audience today and keep getting banned on youtube but a small audience does not guarantee that one is authentic. Of all people here, I probably learned the least amount from him. I find most of his videos generally the same.

Verdict: likely controlled – 65 percent chance

William Pierce

William Pierce was a hard hitting man who really exposed Jewish hegemony. He’s done hundreds of audios and appeared to be very serious about what he was doing. Pierce was the founder of National Alliance which some say is controlled opposition. Like Scott Roberts, Pierce is a white nationalist and can be quite polarizing. I’m not aware that Pierce has offered much in the way of actual solutions to our problems.

Verdict: possibly controlled – 25 percent chance

Kevin MacDonald

There is no work that has helped me see the light and the bigger picture than Culture of Critique. I believe it is the best material out there (another excellent work is his Understanding Jewish Influence) when it comes to the JQ. That being said his endorsement of Donald Trump and controlled opposition shills like David Duke makes me pretty certain that MacDonald is controlled. He has a relatively high amount of exposure and is one of the most recognizable names in the white nationalist movement. I still highly recommend his books and I do feel that it is almost impossible to avoid all the controlled opps in order to get relevant information. You just have to know how to use the information.

Come to think about it, I am beginning to believe that MacDonald serves as some sort of punching bag for those who look into the JQ. Like David Duke, MacDonald is probably there to make those who look into the JQ as sub-human, mental unstable, unsophisticated, and unfit for society.

Verdict: controlled

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Christopher Bjerknes exposes the bible like no other and links Jewish hegemony directly to passages in it. This is very important because I’m not aware of many others who do that. He seems to cover all the bases and acknowledged that the War on Terror is a scheme to destroy the Arab/Muslim people (though recently he has backed away from that). Bjerknes’ views on Hitler and national socialist Germany has made many Jew-wise people suspicious however. He believes Hitler was either secretly working for the Jews or working for the Jews without knowing it.

Verdict: possibly controlled – 50 percent chance

Charles Giuliani

Charles Giuliani does his podcasts on Renegade Broadcasting. His specialty is the bible and claims he was about to enter the priesthood until he read the thing to find out how corrupt it was. Other than the bible, Giuliani covers a diverse array of subject matters such as Michael Jackson, Alex Jones, Carrie Fisher, JFK, the moon landings and NASA, the mysteries of the pyramid, Jews in ancient China, Jews in ancient Syria, etc. A lot of the things he discusses are interesting and I would like to read up more about them. Unfortunately, for some odd reason, Giuliani rarely discloses his sources (from what I’ve been told you can email Giuliani for his sources). The fact he has been doing shows for years on Renegade, which I exposed, should make one suspicious. Giuliani presents a similar problem of that of Kyle Hunt. Is he a one man show? Where does Giuliani get the time to research such an enormous diversity of subject matters while at the same time, I presume, earn a living?

Verdict: possibly controlled – 50 percent chance

Of all the people on this list I would say that Mike Stathis and Kevin MacDonald (even though controlled) has helped me out the most in seeing through the media BS and seeing the establishment for who they are.

Comments for Removed Video: “Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR”

Search across your channel

Filter
Comments fetched successfully
Review1316USA
Review1316USA • 15 minutes ago (edited)
Just my opinion, but I don’t think women belong in the “truth community”, they should be at home supporting their husbands and family. The chaotic nature of a woman matches that of the JEW (Jewishness is a feminine force), and that is why they are used to great extent to breed confusion and strife where we should have clarity. As a man you should never respect a woman as an authority figure, it is against the natural order.

1

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

Judder Man
Judder Man • 31 minutes ago
When PMTMR disappeared, you were the only YTer mentioning him.

On Bitchute, the few old videos uploaded have all been trolled to the same end: that he was a paedophile who’s been arrested.

Not knowing anything for sure, the information he provided remains important. The vessel is secondary.

Gentiles need to find common ground between one another.

1

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

ME
• 1 second ago
When you do a Bitchute search of PMTMR only a few results come up. Same with Stathis.

A.O.D For You
A.O.D For You • 58 minutes ago (edited)
I do like Charles Guiliani, the rest is crap from Renegade.

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

ME
• 1 second ago
I like him the best, but even then I have some doubts about him. For one thing he rarely discloses his sources. I would like to look some of the stuff up he discusses such as the Founding Fathers or the early history of Jews in China.

frogsgottalent
frogsgottalent • 1 hour ago
“ McCarthy “ has been known as totally malignant for a long time.

2

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

Terrarium Firma
Terrarium Firma • 1 hour ago
flat earth movement is from NASA Houston.

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

Chuck Dellano
Chuck Dellano • 1 hour ago
Flat earth is perfect example of sidetrack bullshit to waste everyones time yet again.

1

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

Terrarium Firma
Terrarium Firma • 1 hour ago
mccarthy is a jewish name. Phoenician canaanite according to charles vallancey

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

Chuck Dellano
Chuck Dellano • 1 hour ago
Certain channels are easily offended if you can actually think and make a serious comment,i watch them ban people and erase comments.Not mine untill today .They are the topic police and are angered or triggered if asked anything off their scripted waste of time usual bullshit of division and latest fake rabbit holes to ditract from anything that is actually happening now.Not 5 years ago.

1

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

ME
• 1 second ago
Even worse when you comment on those sites, they can analyze the comments and use that to determine who you are.

ME
• 2 seconds ago
They have removed entire articles that I guess stepped too far over the boundaries. Axe of Perun disappeared along with his articles. He provided some of the deepest exposure on the JQ.

Musings Of A Madman
Musings Of A Madman • 1 hour ago
PMTMR or Jim How’s latest video is was made about a year ago, he mentions Trump and few other issues. His latest channel has been dormant since then, but he is still floating around. I think he may have been disheartened by the censorship and lack of of awareness. I will get back to you with the link of his latest channel.

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

Musings Of A Madman
Musings Of A Madman • 1 hour ago
Link for his latest channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKnn1cpjhXSwkemqpXnQySQ

ME
• 1 second ago
I think he’s gone or locked up. I have not seen any new material in a year and a half.

vachief
vachief • 1 hour ago
Flat earth was scientifically proven back in 1800s England. Global spinning earth revolving around the sun, was pushed by the alchemist Isaac (Jew) Newton to undermine faith in the Holy Bible.
Water always finds it’s own level, and does not curve…..ever.

1

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

frogsgottalent
frogsgottalent • 54 minutes ago
Utter bullshit.

1

Chuck Dellano
Chuck Dellano • 1 hour ago (edited)
Well an ugly hag told me to F off today,i stated Newsflash everyone pays twice for a morgage.Sore topic it seems.😎🙊🙉🙈😱

Sinead McCarthy Exposes Herself by Attacking PMTMR

William Springer
William Springer • 1 day ago
According to ‘The Global Bell Curve’ by Richard Lynn , Blacks in Africa have an average I.Q. of 70 (The lower 2% for whites). Blacks in the U.S., (the vast majority having White ancestors) have an average I.Q. of 85 (The lower 15% for whites). Native Americans have an average I.Q. of 85 as well. While Ashkenazi Jews have an average i.Q. of 118 (approximately the upper 10% for whites). There is a greater I.Q. gap between Gentile Whites and Ashkenazi Jews, than there is between Whites and Blacks in the U.S.. That is a key reason why they have come to control our government, media, academia, finance , etc.. ••••••••••
East Asians (Japanese, Chinese, and Koreans) have an average I.Q. of 110 (The upper 25% for Whites), but East Asians do not generate high functioning cognitive outliers as Europeans do. If you name the 1,000 greatest minds that have generated the key ideas that have improved the human condition , you’ll find that they are almost entirely caucasoid males.

 

 

 

Atheism Is A Jewish Led Movement

Now I haven’t done much in the way of research to confirm that atheism is a Jewish-led movement but I can observe from the behavior of atheists and the material put out by certain authors that it is indeed a Jewish-controlled movement. Lately I’ve attended a few social groups for freethinkers and non-believers. What I’ve observed was that the people who are staunch atheists are typically very left-wing (and sometimes very vocal about it). I find some of them very radical. A lot of them support open borders, the sexualization of society, and the destruction of cultural norms and traditional values. These values are exactly the ones that organized Jewry has been pushing on the West for the past century. The destruction of religion and spirituality has especially been pushed by the violent communist movements in the Soviet Union and China that killed tens of millions of people.

Atheism is the opposite of spirituality. It gives no possibility of an external driving force. It gives no possibility of spontaneity. It paints the picture of life as completely black and white with no wiggle room. This one-sideness of portraying an issue is a typical Jewish propaganda tool. I consider myself an agnostic. I am open to the possibility that a higher being or deity exists. While there is no way to prove that one exists it is also not possible to prove that one does not exist.

I do not know whether the movement in atheism has always been Jewish-led but I do know it has been Jewish influenced in modern times. Atheists such as John Loftus who has written The Christian Delusion

also has written The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed The Jewish People. Just as the Religious Right in this country has been subverted into supporting Israel, this book attempts to do the same for non-believers.

Atheists such as Ali Rizvi, a Pakistani, written the book The Atheist Muslim. I do know exactly what is in the book but from his youtube video and a live chat session with him it is clear that he promotes (indirectly) the wars for Israel by demonizing Islam and saying that it is directly responsible for 9/11 and all these “Islamic” terrorist attacks since. He says we need open criticisms of that religion and we are not getting enough of it. Rizvi is very left-wing and promotes the Jewish ideology of Westernizing the Middle East. More on Rizvi later.

Few of these well-known atheists have come out publicly to criticize Judaism.

The Jewish Obsession of Wealth

We know that Jews are very powerful. We know that they run the banking system, the financial system, and many large corporations. Their tribalism is one reason for their success in controlling such a large part of the system. Jews know how to work together and pool their resources to buy up establishments. The Jews’ dominance over society is also the result of their savy-ness in making lots of money. Money is power. Wealth appears to be a large part of what makes a Jew a Jew. In fact Jews who are less successful in raking in the dough are often looked upon by their fellow Jews as being inferior.

Examples abound in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) of the Jew’s obsession for wealth:

Genesis 13:1 So Abram went up from Egypt to the Negev, with his wife and everything he had, and Lot went with him. 2 Abram had become very wealthy in livestock and in silver and gold.

Genesis 34:25 Three days later, while all of them were still in pain, two of Jacob’s sons, Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brothers, took their swords and attacked the unsuspecting city, killing every male. 26 They put Hamor and his son Shechem to the sword and took Dinah from Shechem’s house and left. 27 The sons of Jacob came upon the dead bodies and looted the city where their sister had been defiled. 28 They seized their flocks and herds and donkeys and everything else of theirs in the city and out in the fields. 29 They carried off all their wealth and all their women and children, taking as plunder everything in the houses.

Isaiah 49:10 “Foreigners will rebuild your walls, and their kings will serve you. Though in anger I struck you, in favor I will show you compassion. 11 Your gates will always stand open, they will never be shut, day or night, so that people may bring you the wealth of the nations.

Personally I know a Jew who runs a very successful auction company. I’ll call him Ari instead of his real name. Ari does estate auctions. His auctions always bring in top dollar. You can count on the highest of high end items being auctioned off at his establishment. One auction I thought about attending had dozens of Rolex and Patek Phillipe watches. I had no intention to bid. I just wanted to see what was going on. A colleague of mine had attended Ari’s auction before. The colleague said he put in a bid of $8000 on one of his items only to see it eventually go to $21000. A person who runs one of the estate companies in my area tells me that when Ari sits down with his clients it is all business. There is no personal side to him whatsoever. Everything is about figures and what percent of the cut he gets and what percent of the cut they get. Ari is about as direct as one could get.

Samuel Roth in Jews Must Live is one of the few Jews who exposes Jewish behavior. He says that Jewish children are coached by their parents to take up a line of work that makes them the most amount money with the least amount of effort. That’s why you see so many Jews as lawyers, doctors, stock brokers, and CEOs. Jews as doctors are in it primarily for the money. Same with law.

Now there would not be so much harm in the Jews taking in such immense droves to the practice of the cardinal professions if they approached them in the proper spirit. But the Jew does not, cannot, turn to the law with anything like reverence for the profession or for its splendid traditions. Willie sets his jaw grimly to the task of competing with several thousands of other Willies for the few scraps of pickings in law lying about loose, and Izzie’s attitude towards medicine is not much more cheerful or respectful. The attitude of a young Jew towards his profession is really like that of a gangster towards a new racket. – Samuel Roth

Performing manual labor is the ultimate insult to a Jew.

It is pointed out, with the most painful emphasis, that unless he picks up in his studies, he will sink into the horrible ignominy of having to work for his livelihood. So deeply is it impressed on the growing Jew that to have to work with his hands is the most awful humiliation of life.– Samuel Roth

It is a certainty that the Jew’s preoccupation with making money trumps any moral concerns that comes along in making that money. Aside from the corrupt usurious banking system, Jews also ran the entire transatlantic slave trade which allowed the Jews to become rich by auctioning off people as if they were things and running their plantations with cheap labor. Jews are the foremost opportunists. They are especially fond of making something out of nothing.

The Memoirs of Gluckel of Hameln is a collection of stories from the diary of a Jewish mother in 17th century Germany. In a span of 300 pages, the author mentions the words “riches” and “wealth” some 600 times. For example on page 15:

(When) my grandfather Nathan Melrich was driven out of Detmold, he settled in the house of Loeb Hildesheim and brought with him great riches. Esther, Loeb’s wife, has told me wonderful things about these treasures. He had coffers all filled with gold chains and jewelry, and whole bags of pearls, so I do not suppose that in those days there was as rich a man for a hundred miles around.

And on page 16:

The groom, Elias Cohen, received from his father a dowry of 500 Reichsthalers, and lucky in everything he undertook, in a short while he amassed a large fortune. But, alas, he died young, even before he was forty. If God had spared his life, he would have become a big man, for God had endowed him with good luck. If he so much picked up a dung, it turned to gold in his hands.

 

Puritanism, Zionism, and the New Jerusalem

The Puritans, who practiced the teachings of John Calvin (likely a crypto-Jew who’s last name may have been Cohen), could have been the first “Christian” Zionists – at least the first influential group of Christian Zionists. They were instrumental in the founding of the United States and shaping the early beginnings of the country. Puritanism, also known as Calvinism, was really Judaism for Gentiles. The Puritans based their beliefs almost entirely on the set of satanic Jewish scriptures known as the Old Testament or Hebrew Bible. They went beyond kissing the ass of the “Chosenites”. The Puritans essentially saw the Jews as God.

Locating their town on the sea coast north of Boston, the Puritans nodded directly to Jerusalem by calling their settlement Salem. Obsessed with the Hebrew Bible, these separatists identified with the Exodus from Egypt and the vision of life in a New World, covenanted to God. They called themselves “New Zion,” or “Christian Israel,” and the Old Testament was their guide to naming children, towns and mountains, and the legal source for their founding charters. – Rabbi Ken Spiro, Aish

The familiar story that we’ve been taught in history class was that many Europeans fled to America to escape “religious persecution”. In reality those people practiced a type of belief system that was a threat to the normal order of things. (If you do not already know the wickedness of what is in the OT, I advise you to read my posts concerning those books of the bible) It was a threat not just to the British monarchy but to the common citizens as well.

Previously, during the Puritan Revolution in England, (1642-1648) some Puritan extremists had even sought to replace English common law with Biblical laws of the Old Testament, but were prevented from doing so. In America, however, there was far more freedom to experiment with the use of Biblical law in the legal codes of the colonies and this was exactly what these early colonists set out to do. – Rabbi Spiro

Time after time again Jews have been leading revolutions that have destroyed the governments of Gentiles. Take a look into the French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution, the World Wars, the War on Terror, and the recent Arab Spring. Jews have been behind each one of those revolutions. The “Puritan Revolution” was really no different.

The most fanatical Puritans were the ones that set off to the New World. They saw themselves as reenacting the story in Exodus where Moses led the Israelites out of bondage from Egypt. (What the church conveniently leave out of course was that the Israelites were infiltrating and subverting the Egyptian government and stealing the wealth of the country prior to being enslaved, as told in Genesis). The Puritans saw themselves as Pilgrims (the holiday of Thanksgiving commemorates this event), England as Egypt, the King as the Pharoah, the Atlantic Ocean as the Red Sea, America as Israel, and the Indians as the Canaanites. Here is what the bible says of the Canaanites:

Genesis 13:14-17 The Lord said to Abram after Lot had parted from him, “Look around from where you are, to the north and south, to the east and west. All the land that you see (Canaan) I will give to you and your offspring forever. I will make your offspring like the dust of the earth, so that if anyone could count the dust, then your offspring could be counted. Go, walk through the length and breadth of the land, for I am giving it to you.”

Deuteronomy 7:1-2 When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations—the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites, seven nations larger and stronger than you — and when the Lord your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy.

Everything that the Puritans practiced was that of advancing world Jewry and helping make America the “control center” of world Jewish hegemony. Christopher Columbus’ voyage to the New World in 1492 (the same years Jews were kicked out of Spain) was financed by Jews and the slave trade was entirely in the hands of Jews. What percentage of the Puritans were actually Jews is unknown but there is no question that Jews were behind their leadership. Almost assuredly the Jews were preaching to the Puritans about how they were one of the “lost tribes” of Israel and that they are actually Jews. The Jews have done this in so many other parts of the world wherever they have gone. They would convince the Gentiles that they are actually Jews to get them to subvert their governments and support Jewish causes.

The Puritan colonists seeing they were doing the work of God were hellbent on making the Hebrew bible the legal foundation of the law of the land.

Subsequently, the New Haven legislators adopted a legal code ― the Code of 1655 ― which contained some 79 statutes, half of which contained Biblical references, virtually all from the Hebrew Bible. The Plymouth Colony had a similar law code as did the Massachusetts assembly, which, in 1641 adopted the so-called “Capital Laws of New England” based almost entirely on Mosaic law. – Spiro

So entrenched was the obsession over the use of Judaic scriptures for daily living that the Hebrew language found it’s way into daily life. William Bradford, a governor of the Plymouth Colony, was the leader of the pilgrims that set off on the Mayflower for the New World.

(Bradford) is recorded as being fanatical about the Hebrew language as he believed that after his death he would speak “the most ancient language”, Hebrew, with God and the angels. – Tsivya Fox, Breaking News Israel

A vote was taken on the Mayflower as to which language the settlers would use in the New World. Apparently, Hebrew lost by just one vote.

The Hebrew Bible played a major role in the founding of leading universities such as Harvard, Yale, William and Mary, Rutgers, Princeton, Brown, Columbia, Johns Hopkins, Dartmouth etc.

Many of these colleges even adopted some Hebrew word or phrase as part of their official emblem or seal. Beneath the banner containing the Latin “Lux et Veritas,” the Yale seal shows an open book with the Hebrew “Urim V’Timum,” which was a part of the breastplate of the High Priest in the days of the Temple. The Columbia seal has the Hebrew name for God at the top center, with the Hebrew name for one of the angels on a banner toward the middle. Dartmouth uses the Hebrew words meaning “God Almighty” in a triangle in the upper center of its seal.

So popular was the Hebrew Language in the late 16th and early 17th centuries that several students at Yale delivered their commencement orations in Hebrew. Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Brown, Princeton, Johns Hopkins, and the University of Pennsylvania taught courses in Hebrew ― all the more remarkable because no university in England at the time offered it. – Rabbi Spiro

Jews and the Removal of the Native Americans

This section is from The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume I. Though the book mainly discloses the Jewish involvement in the transatlantic slave trade it also delves briefly into the Jew’s dealing with the Native Americans. The Jews not only had a large influence over the shaping of America, but the founding of America probably would not have happened if it wasn’t for the Jews. A large part of the colonization had to deal with removing the native inhabitants – the Indians. Much of what you were taught about the removal of the Indians, like the slave trade, unfairly puts the blame on the white Europeans when it was actually the “Chosenites” who were responsible for those atrocities.

The Jews have always been savvy with money and commerce and they used it to their advantage in gaining territory:

Sending their packhorse trains across the mountains, the Jewish merchants fully hoped to dominate the western trade, to control mercantile sales, to build new towns and colonies, and to populate the vast territory between the Alleghenies and the Mississippi. This required the expulsion of the owners and reallocation of the valuable land and resources – a fitting assignment for the Royal forces of Britain and France. (SRBBJ, 109)

The Jews traded with the Indians. Typical Jewish behavior entails them getting the better end of the deal – ALWAYS. For them, trading with the Indians was second to slave trading in terms of profitability. The Jews were very flexible in what they bartered. Alcohol was a favored choice of trade.

Simon, John Miller and brewer Mordecai Moses Mordecai decided to process hard liquor to introduce into the Indian trade. When it appeared that war was imminent between the French, Indians and the British, Simon began to make guns. By the 1770s it was said that the Simon conglomerate had a “virtual monopoly” on the western trade. (SRBBJ, 108)

The Jews also made big money selling weapons and provisions to both sides of a war. Jacob Marcus:

Army supple was, in consequence, a big business, and it was a business which the Jews knew well …. Some of them were massive suppliers, involved in operations requiring sums of money in the millions; others were petty sutlers or army peddlers …. Supply as big business came into its own during the vast military operations required by the French and Indian War. The large French and English armies had to be provisioned, and both armies looked to Jewish suppliers for food.

The Jews have always had a plan to take away the property of others. They eventually stabbed the Indians in the back after pretending to be their friends:

Those who had won the trust of the Indians were the greatest beneficiaries of their extinction. Augusta Levy, wife of Winnebago Indian trader John Meyer Levy, witnessed the Indian’s expulsion from the Minnesota area in 1848 with these words: …in the spring there was a great excitement over the removal of the Indians. [John] was very glad they were going… he had had enough of the Indians. (SRBBJ, 113)

As the European encroachment created lethal conflict, these Jewish traders of ten supplied the European with weapons, staples and critical military intelligence. Once the Redman was removed there was no one more advantageously positioned to seize the valuable land than the Indian trader. (SRBBJ, 106)

Joseph Simon was one of those Jewish peddlers that, according to Rabbi Sharfman:

Barter[ed] with the tribes exchanging colorful trinkets and a variety of eye-catching beads and the like for valuable furs… Little did [the Indians] realize… that they were bartering away their civilization. The iron kettles, shooting irons, and sundries they acquired for furs meant that they had to kill for many pelts that exceeded their needs for clothing, food, and shelter. Dependency on the white man’s whiskey led to quarrelsomeness and murder of fellow braves. They fell prey to the diseases of the pale faces for which they had no immunity – smallpox, measles and sexual diseases. (SRBBJ, 107)

Sharfman on infecting the Indians with smallpox:

Captain Ecuyer then called upon Levy Andrew [Levy] at his trading post. He told how he tricked the chief into accepting the deadly gifts and placed an order to replace the blankets and handkerchiefs. This grim invoice accompanied the new goods, receipt of which was duly acknowledged by Ecuyer:

Debtor: The Crown to Levy, Trent & Co., for sundries had by order of Captain Simeon Ecuyer, Commandant… to sundries, got to replace in kind those which were taken from the people in the hospital to convey the smallpox to the Indians, viz.,

2 blankets @ 2.00.
1 silk handkerchief @ .10.
1 linen do. 3.6
Total: 2.13.6
Fort Pitt, August 15, 1763

I do hereby certify that the above articles… were had for the uses above-mentioned.

S. Ecuyer, Captain, Commandant

Jews and the Promotion of Radical Individualism

Jews have been at the forefront of the promotion of “radical individualism”. What is referred to as radical individualism is people acting in ways that is harmful to the community. In other words it is people acting purely in their self-interest with little to no regard for their fellow men. It places the individual above the group. Jews have been promoting greed, materialism, the idea of self-importance, and the “every man for himself” mentality. They do not want to promote the type of individualism that encourages “thinking outside the box”. The Jewish-controlled media promote ideas that degenerate society through sex and pornography, interracial marriages, homosexuality, and feminism. Jews hate the idea of organization – that is Gentiles being organized. Yet they encourage their own people to remain as fiercely organized as possible.  Jews have the habit of promoting to the gentiles the exact opposite of what they themselves practice.

Libertarianism and anarchy are two ideologies that have a heavy concentration of Jewish leadership and are radically individualistic. Adam Kokesh is probably the most well-known person in the anarchy movement. The Austrian School of Economics, which promotes the abolishment of government, was founded in recognition of Ludwig Von Mises, a Jew. Some of the most prominent members of that school are Jewish including Murray Rothbard, Walter Block, George Reisman, and David Friedman.

Why Do Jews Push For Radical Individualism?

In the long run, radical individualism among gentiles and the fragmentation of gentile culture offer a superior environment for Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy, and this is indeed an important direction of current Jewish intellectual and political activity. – Kevin MacDonald in Culture of Critique

Jews are terrified of Gentile solidarity. They see gentile solidarity and gentile governments as highly opposed to Jewish interests. Indeed gentile solidarity has been primarily responsible for the persecution and expulsion of Jews over much of their history throughout Europe and other parts of the world. Leaders such as Adolph Hitler may have been the most well known man to organize a group of people. Jews have seen Arabs, who are among the most ethnocentric people in the world, as a major threat to the security of Israel and the Jewish people.

The reasons for the repeated expulsion and persecution of the Jews has much to do with the way Gentiles viewed Jewish behavior. They saw Jews as being exploiters. They saw Jews as being overly-competitive and putting Gentiles out of business. They wanted government to do something about this. Jews on the other hand have seen gentiles as getting in their way and limiting their full potential.

Individuals are little threat to highly-organized groups such as the Jews because individuals tend to mind their own business and work primarily towards personal goals. Individuals see it more as a burden than a duty to act in the interest of the people and the community. Individuals are less likely to practice racism and discrimination. In fact under free-market capitalism, a system that encourages a high amount of individualism, participants are punished for discrimination. Discrimination against potential customers harms profits which is the number one driving force under capitalism.

Another reason why Jews push for radical individualism is that individuals are more likely to spend money and be selfish with it. Because the banking and financial system is primarily Jewish owned and run they want people to spend and borrow as much as possible. They are particularly interested in transferring wealth and resources from the hands of Gentiles to the hands of Jews. Organized groups are far more efficient when it comes to sharing resources with one another. They see selfishness as harmful to group interests. On the other hand individualists are more likely to depend on the system for their needs. They are more likely to live a discrete atomized lifestyle and are primarily concerned for themselves. Look at the way Mexicans in the US go about their daily lives. Mexicans are experts in networking. A lot of Mexicans only do business with other Mexicans and avoid the “system”. I personally know of a Mexican family who run a lucrative home rental business and do not even use a bank.

 

 

Bertram Korn on the Jewish Slave Trade

All quotes are from Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South by rabbi Bertram Korn published by the Reform Congregation Keneseth Israel in 1961.

Very few Jews spoke out against slavery

Jews participated in every aspect and process of the exploitation of the defenseless blacks. (p34)

Slave-dealing obviously did not disqualify Jews from receiving the friendship and esteem of their co-religionists any more than it disqualified Christians; engaging in business transactions in Negro flesh was not regarded as incompatible with being a good Jew. (43)

The largest Jewish slave-trading firm in the South seems to have been the Davis family of Petersburg and Richmond, including Ansley, Benjamin, George, and Solomon.” They were the only Jews mentioned by Harriett Beecher Stowe in her little-known commentary, “A Key to Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. Mrs. Stowe quotes a letter by Dr. Gamaliel Bailey, referring to them:

“The Davises, in Petersburg, are the great slave-traders. They are Jews, came to that place many years ago as poor peddlers . . . These men are always in the market, giving the highest price for slaves. During the summer and fall they buy them up at low prices, trim, shave, wash them, fatten them so that they may look sleek, and sell them to great profit.” (47)

Chapter 8, Opinions of Jews About Slavery

Page 57:

This study has thus far traced a pattern of almost complete conformity to the slave society of the Old South on the part of its Jewish citizens. They participated in the buying, owning, and selling of slaves, and the exploitation of their labor, along with their neighbors. The behavior of Jews towards slaves seems to have been indistinguishable from that of their non-Jewish friends.

No Jewish political figure of the Old South ever expressed any reservations about the justice of slavery or the rightness of the Southern position. Men like David Levy Yulee of Florida and David S. Kaufman of Texas were typical exponents of Southern views on states’ rights and the spread of slavery.

Pages 59-63:

Nor was there anyone among the many Jewish journalists, writers, and publicists of the Old South who questioned the moral, political, or economic justice of slavery. Jacob De Cordova, the Texas real-estate promoter, newspaper editor and geographer, emphatically denied charges that he had given voice to “free-soil doctrines” during his 1858 lecture tour in the North, and “wish[ed] it distinctly understood that our feelings and education have always been pro-slavery.” Isaac Harby, the Charleston dramatist and political essayist, was writing in Charleston in opposition to “the abolitionist society and its secret branches,” as early as 1824. Jacob N. Cardozo, the editor and political economist, asserted that slavery was defensible both economically and morally. In the former respect, he maintained that

“Slavery brought not only great wealth to the South, but to the slaves a greater share of its enjoyment that in many regions where the relation between employer and employee was based on wages.”

In regard to the ethical question, he placed the responsibility squarely on the Deity: “The reason the Almighty made the colored black is to prove their inferiority.” After the Civil War, in his well- known Reminiscences of Charleston, Cardozo expressed his sympathy with the planters who were now suffering great privation:

“The owner of two hundred to five hundred slaves, with a princely income, has not only to submit to the most degraded employments, but he frequently cannot obtain them. In some instances, he has to drive a cart, or attend a retail grocery, while he may have to obey the orders of an ignorant and course menial. There is something unnatural in this reverse of position — something revolting to my sense of propriety in this social degradation.”‘

Edwin De Odeon, the journalist and Confederate diplomat, devoted many pages of his reminiscences to an extended apologia for slavery. His brother, Thomas Cooper De Leon, one of the most prolific Southern litterateurs of the second half of the nineteenth century, wrote many novels and other works in the Southern romantic style of which he was a major practitioner. In one of his most famous works, Belles, Peaux and Brains of the Confederacy, De Leon described all talk of cruelty in the slave system as propaganda and mythology; he underlined the fact that Harriett Beecher Stowe was compelled to ascribe a Yankee origin to her famous character, Simon Legree. Samuel Mordecai, the bachelor journalist of Richmond, derived part of his income from his articles in Edmund Ruffin’s The Farmer’s Register, a journal devoted primarily to the interests of Southern employers of slave labor forces. Mordecai loved everything about old Virginia, and wrote tenderly of the old colored aristocracy, in his Richmond in By-Gone-Days. He too regarded slavery as a natural and desirable condition of society.

Even in the days of the secession crisis, and the subsequent prolongated war and eventual defeat, many Southern Jews believed slavery to be indispensable to their happiness and security. George W. Mordecai, born a Jew but now an Episcopalian banker, railroad executive, and plantation owner in North Carolina, wrote to a Northern Republican in Dec 1860:

“I would much sooner trust myself alone on my plantation surrounded by my slaves, than in one of your large manufacturing towns when your laborers are discharged from employment and crying aloud for bread for themselves and their little ones.”

In 1864, Private Eugene Henry Levy of the Confederate Army objected to the radical suggestion that Negroes be utilized in the war effort and be freed for this assistance. “The slaves,” he said, “are in their proper sphere as they are at present situated within the boundaries of the Confederacy.”

After the war was over, some Southern Jews still believed that slavery had been a necessary foundation of human society. Eleanor H. Cohen, the daughter of Dr. Philip Melvin Cohen of Charleston, said in the innocent selfishness of young maidenhood:

“I, who believe in the institution of slavery, regret deeply its being abolished. I am accustomed to have them wait on me, and I dislike white servants very much.”

Perhaps no more concise and self-deceptive rationalization of slavery was ever written than the observations which were recorded by Solomon Cohen, the distinguished civic leader and merchant of Savannah, who had lost a son in the war, in a letter which he wrote to his sister-in-law, Emma Mordecai, shortly after the end of the war:

“I believe that the institution of slavery was refining and civilizing to the whites — giving them an elevation of sentiment and ease and dignity of manners only attainable in societies under the restraining influence of a privileged class — and at the same time the only human institution that could elevate the Negro from barbarism and develop the small amount of intellect with which he is endowed.”

Such sentiments might well be expected of members of families long resident in the South and thoroughly acclimated to its habits and assumptions. The De Leon’s, Mordecai’s, and Cardozo’s had lived with their neighbors long enough to share their ideas and attitudes. But what of the newly immigrant German Jews who came to the South in increasing numbers beginning in the 1840’s? There is no evidence that they found it very difficult to adjust to the slave society of which they became a part. Julius Weis, of New Orleans, who came to the United States in 1845, recorded his shock at his first sight of a Negro

“being whipped upon his bare back by an overseer. The right of a human being punished in this manner was very repugnant to me, though living in the midst of a country where slavery existed. I afterwards got somewhat accustomed to it, but I always felt a pity for the poor slaves.”

But Weis’ compassion seemed to be limited to this matter of punishment, for he owned several slaves during the period from 1853 to 1857, and bought a Negro barber in 1862. He notes that “I never found it necessary to punish them in such a manner,” but his feeling of pity never led him to adopt a critical attitude toward the entire system of slavery.

Louis Stix of Cincinnati wrote of a German Jewish immigrant to the South who became violent in his pro-slavery opinions. They met at a Jewish boarding-house in New York City; at dinner one night this unidentified Southern Jew said that “Southerners could not live without slavery.” “I replied to this,” wrote Stix, “by a very uncalled-for remark not at all flattering to our race who were living in the South . . . The Southerner . . . drew his pistol to compel me to take back my words . . . I hope [he] has since learned to do without slaves, or has returned to the place from which he came, where he was almost a slave himself.””‘ But such a direct application of logic from Jewish experience in Europe to the situation of the Negroes in the South could only stem from the mind of a Northern Jew; it was never, to my knowledge, expressed in such blunt terms by a Southern Jew. To the contrary, the average Southern Jew would probably have agreed with Aaron Hirsch, who came to the United States in 1847 and worked through Mississippi and Arkansas, and who said that

“the institution of Slavery as it existed in the South was not so great a wrong as people believe. The Negroes were brought here in a savage state; they captured and ate each other in their African home. Here they were instructed to work, were civilized and got religion, and were perfectly happy.”

Some Southern Jews, however, did not deceive themselves into thinking that the Negro slaves were “perfectly happy.” These sensitive spirits were appalled at human exploitation of the life and labor of other human beings. Most of them reacted in a purely personal way, by avoiding the owning of slaves or by helping slaves. Major Alfred Mordecai of the United States Army, reared in the South and brother to planters and defenders of slavery, purchased only one slave in his life, simply to emancipate her. He believed that slavery was “the greatest misfortune and curse that could have befallen us.” Yet he would do nothing to oppose slavery, and when the lines were drawn, he resigned his commission rather than fight for the North, without being willing to take up arms for the South.

In Betram Korn’s other book, The Jews of the Confederacy, Betram quotes Alfred Mordecai, a Jewish army general:

[I have] a sort of repugnance to the Negroes which has increased upon me as I have been less and less associated with them. Therefore, I have never wished to make a home among them. This feeling is, naturally enough, much stronger on the part of my family; we have seldom spoken of it, but I am sure that it would be utterly repugnant to the feelings of my wife and daughters to live among slaves, and if it can be avoided, I should be extremely loathe to oblige them, by residence and habit, to overcome this repugnance, even supposing it possible… I have no doubt that the race is in a better condition here than they are as savages in Africa, or than they would be as free men, from all the experience we have seen. But I never wished to be one of the agents in thus bettering their condition… and I am utterly averse to any participation in the schemes for destroying or weakening the hold of the masters on their slaves, unless they themselves are willing to abandon it. (Korn, The Jews of the Confederacy)

In his letter of March 17, 1861 to brother Samuel, Alfred Mordecai defended slavery as a constitutional right:

it appears to be sufficient to know that at the formation of our government slavery existed all over the land and was expressly protected by the Constitution from being interfered with by any authority but the states themselves; that therefore the people who have retained it are entitled to the enforcement of their constitutional rights with regard to it both in the letter and the spirit. (Korn, The Jews of the Confederacy)

Despite Rabbi Korn’s extensive documentation on the Jewish participation in black slavery in America, Korn appears to be apologetic. He believes that Jews were no different than their white-Gentile counterparts in the way they bought and sold and treated black slaves. Korn believed that because Jews were a small minority of the early American population they were heavily influenced by the customs and behaviors of the host population and they simply engaged in a practice that was widely accepted at the time. Korn like many Jews are self-deceptive. The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews extensively documents, with mainly Jewish sources, that Jews had been involved in all aspects of the Trans-american slave trade and that if it wasn’t for them, the trade slave would like have never happened. Kudos for Korn exposing the Jews in the slave trade, something few other Jews would do. But he needs to go further and not be afraid to uncover who the ringleaders were behind the whole thing.

Zionism and the War on Terror

Zionism and the War on Terror

This essay deals with Kevin MacDonald’s book Understanding Jewish Influence (2004) (recently banned on Amazon but can be found on archive.org). MacDonald was a professor of psychology at California State University-Long Beach. He has a number of books and papers examining the role that influential Jews have played in shaping academia, the media, and foreign policy. MacDonald’s best known work, The Culture of Critique, also banned on Amazon, explains how influential Jews have been key figures in shaping the social sciences, academic think-tanks, and numerous civil rights organizations such as the NAACP, ACLU, and SPLC. Understanding Jewish Influence discusses Jews in the neoconservative movement. In this book MacDonald documents that the War on Terror and America’s numerous entanglements in the Middle-East originates from powerful Jewish and pro-Israeli interests. The neoconservative movement is primarily concerned with protecting the state of Israel.

(Unless otherwise stated, quotes are from Understanding Jewish Influence.)

In the contemporary world, organized American Jewish lobbying groups and deeply committed Jews in the Bush administration and the media are behind the pro-Israel U.S. foreign policy that is leading to war against virtually the entire Arab world. – Kevin MacDonald

Background

In order to understand the current Middle-Eastern conflict you have to understand the history of the region. There has been a virtual conflict between Israel and the surrounding Arab states since the founding of modern-day Israel in 1948. It is essentially an ethnic war between the Jews and the Arabs. Both groups of people are highly ethnocentric. Both groups of people are intensely committed to their people and their land. Both groups of people see their people as one big family in their struggle for a common cause.

Some of the more notable conflicts in that region over the past half-century have been the the Six-Day War of 1967, the Yom-Kippur war of 1973, the Iran-Iraq war during the 1980s, the Gulf War of the 1990s, and the present War on Terror. Zionist leaders have long been intent on transforming the politics of the Middle-East to produce Arab leaders that are on good terms with Israel.

Proposals for regime change, such as found in “A Clean Break,” have a long history in Israeli thought. For example, in 1982 Israeli strategist Oded Yinon echoed a long line of Israeli strategists who argued that Israel should attempt to dissolve all the existing Arab states into smaller, less potentially powerful states. These states would then become clients of Israel as a regional imperial power. Neocons have advertised the war in Iraq as a crusade for a democratic, secular, Western-oriented, pro-Israel Iraq. (MacDonald, p 89)

(The) Balkanization of Iraq was always an acceptable outcome, because Israel would then find itself surrounded by small Arab countries worried about each other instead of forming a solid block against Israel. (MacDonald, 89)

Anwar Sadat of Egypt became the first Arab leader to recognize Israel by signing the Camp David Accords in 1978. Sixteen years later Jordan became the second Arab country to sign a peace treaty with Israel. Several other Arab countries followed including Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the UAE.

The War on Terror

The events of 9/11 have given the West an initiative for rearranging the politics of the Middle-East:

Intensely committed Zionists with close links to Israel occupy prominent positions in the Bush administration, especially in the Department of Defense and on the staff of Vice President Dick Cheney. The long-term consequence of Zionism is that the U.S. is on the verge of attempting to completely transform the Arab/Muslim world to produce governments that accept Israel and whatever fate it decides for the Palestinians, and, quite possibly, to set the stage for further Israeli expansionism. (MacDonald, 32)

Below are some of the key players that have abetted the “War on Terror” and were highly influential members of the Bush administration. It is important to point out that all those listed in this section are Jews.

Richard Perle – (Chairman Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board)

(The) defining moment in our history was certainly the Holocaust…. It was the destruction, the genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering…We don’t want that to happen again…when we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so, because when we fail to do so, the results are catastrophic. – Perle on BBC’s Panorama

Expelled from Senator Henry Jackson’s office in the 70’s after the NSA caught him passing highly-classified documents to the Israeli Embassy. He is a close friend of the former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon and the current prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Perle had many ties to Israeli defense companies such as Soltan and Onset Technology.

Perle is listed as a Resident Fellow of the AEI (American Enterprise Institute), and he is on the boards of directors of the Jerusalem Post and the Hollinger Corporation, a media company controlled by Conrad Black. Hollinger owns major mediaproperties in the U.S. (Chicago Sun-Times), England (the Daily Telegraph), Israel (Jerusalem Post), and Canada (the National Post; 50 percent ownership with CanWest Global Communications, which is controlled by Israel Asper and his family; CanWest has aggressively clamped down on its journalists for any deviation from its strong pro-Israel editorial policies19). (MacDonald, 64)

Paul Wolfowitz – (Deputy Defense Secretary) Was the number two leader within the administration behind the Iraq war mongering.

Within the George H. W. Bush administration, Wolfowitz was “the intellectual godfather and fiercest advocate for toppling Saddam.”199 Wolfowitz has become famous as a key advocate for war with Iraq rather than Afghanistan in the immediate aftermath of September 11. (MacDonald, 87)

Like many listed here, Wolfowitz has a strong Jewish identity. His father Jacob was a life long Zionist and his sister is married to an Israeli and lives in Israel. Wolfowitz can read Hebrew.

Former CIA political analysts Kathleen and Bill Christison note that “One source inside the administration has described [Wolfowitz] frankly as ‘over-the-top crazy when it comes to Israel.’” (Christison & Christison 2003)

Douglas Feith – (Under Secretary of Defense for Rumsfeld) Feith is closely associated with the Zionist Organization of America, which even attacks Jews that don’t agree with its extremist views. Feith, like many other Jewish neocons has been suspected on spying for Israel. Feith has advocated regime change in Iraq since at least the late 1980s. He was responsible for creating the OSP (Office of Special Plans), where much of the fraudulent intelligence was manufactured that justified the attack on Iraq.

Elliott Abrams – (National Security Council Advisor) Was Bush’s top Middle East adviser. Played an important role in the Iran-Contra Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to fight Iraq. He is closely associated with the radical Israeli Likud party.

Abrams acknowledges that the mainstream Jewish community “clings to what is at bottom a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts.” (MacDonald, 90)

Michael Ledeen (special adviser to Wolfowitz). In his book, War on the Terror Masters, Ledeen discloses:

Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission….

Scooter Libby – (Cheney’s Chief of Staff) was recently found guilty of lying to Federal investigators in the Valerie Plame affair, in which Plame, a covert CIA agent, was exposed for political revenge by the Bush administration following her husband’s revelations about the lies leading to the Iraq War.

Joshua Bolton – (White House Deputy Chief of Staff) Accused Syria of having a nuclear program, so that they can attack Syria after Iraq

Ari Fleischer – (White House Spokesman) Is closely connected to Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, who follow the Kabbalah, and hold very extremist and insulting views of non-Jews.

Henry Kissinger – (Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board) Was responsible for wars that killed up to 6 million in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia during the 1970s

Eliot Cohen – (Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board) Openly admitted his hatred of Islam claiming that Islam should be the enemy, not terrorism

David Frum – (Bush’s speechwriter) Writer behind the “Axis of Evil” label. He lumped together all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war

Dov Zakheim – (foreign policy adviser) Co-author of the 1997 Project for the New American Century (PNAC) paper on rebuilding America’s defenses, advocated the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern nations.

Michael Chertoff – (Homeland Security) Co-author of the Patriot Act.

Gentiles in the Movement

Gentiles are encouraged to be in highly visible roles, mainly to lesson the appearance of the movement being overly Jewish.

Dick Cheney – A close associate of Wolfowitz, Cheney has long ties with Jewish neocons.

Both Cheney and Rumsfeld have been associated with Bill Kristol’s PNAC (which advocated a unilateral war for regime change in Iraq at least as early as 1998) and the CSP, two neocon think tanks; Cheney was presented with the ADL’s Distinguished Statesman Award in 1993 and was described by Abraham Foxman as “sensitive to Jewish concerns.” When Cheney was a Congressman during the early 1980s, he attended lunches hosted for Republican Jewish leaders by the House leadership. … He was also a member of JINSA, a major pro-Israel activist organization, until assuming his office as vice president. (MacDonald, 93)

Following the Soviet Union collapse, he and Wolfowitz attempted to draft in 1992, the Defense Planning Guidance, which advocated America’s dominance all throughout Eurasia and threatened any country that planned to challenge the US’s global hegemony. As head of the transition team for the Bush administration, he and Scooter Libby were responsible for stocking the subcabinet level with neocons.

Israel’s fight against terrorism is our fight. Israel’s victory is an important part of our victory. For reasons both moral and strategic, we need to stand with Israel in its fight against terrorism.

– Dick Cheney, April 3, 2002

Donald Rumsfeld – Has had long history of appealing to Jewish and Israeli causes.

In his 1964 campaign for reelection to Congress as representative from a district on the North Shore of Chicago with an important Jewish constituency, he emphasized Soviet persecution of Jews and introduced a bill on this topic in the House. After the 1967 war, he urged the U.S. not to demand that Israel withdraw to its previous borders and he criticized delays in sending U.S. Military hardware to Israel. (MacDonald, 95)

Rumsfeld however has been less committed to the War on Terror compared to his colleagues.

Despite these links with neoconservatives and Jewish causes, Rumsfeld emerges as less an
ideologue and less a passionate advocate for war with Iraq than Cheney. Robert Woodward
describes him as lacking the feverish intensity of Cheney, as a dispassionate “defense
technocrat” who, unlike Cheney, Wolfowitz, and Feith, would have been content if the U.S. had
not gone to war with Iraq.- (MacDonald, 95)

Zionist Organizations

These are some of the Pro-Israel organizations that have a powerful influence in our government and media:

ADL: Anti-defamation League of B’nai B’rith – Part of the ADL’s mission statement is “We fight anti-Semitism and all forms of hate. We advocate for a safe and secure democratic Jewish State of Israel and combat efforts to delegitimize it.” Essentially the ADL, like so many Jewish organization, has worked tirelessly in squelching free speech. The ADL has worked hand-in-hand with major media outlets to censor anything critical of Israel.

AIPAC: America Israel Public Affairs Committee – The most powerful lobbying group in Washington. AIPAC consistently pushes for hawkish foreign policies in the interest of Israel and intimidates any politician who has criticisms of Israel or votes against policies that are in Israel’s favor

CSP: Center for Security Policy—Neoconservative think tank specializing in defense policy; formerly headed by Douglas Feith (Jewish), CSP is now headed by Frank Gaffney (Jewish); the CSP is strongly pro-Israel and favors a strong U.S. Military

JINSA: Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs—Pro-Israel think tank specializing in promoting military cooperation between the U.S. and Israel

MEF: Middle East Forum — Headed by Daniel Pipes (Jewish), the MEF is a pro-Israel advocacy organization. They are behind Campus Watch, an organization that monitors university professors who criticize Israel. The MEF (along with the ADL, American Jewish Committee, and American Jewish Congress) were able to convince the US House to approve a bill that authorized monitoring of Middle-Eastern studies throughout US universities.

PNAC: Project for the New American Century—Headed by Bill Kristol (Jewish), the PNAC issues letters and statements signed mainly by prominent neocons and designed to influence public policy

ZOA: Zionist Organization of America – Pro-Israel lobbying organization associated with the more fanatical end of the pro-Israel spectrum in America.

These two other organizations, though not having significant influence in Washington, is worth noting:

JDL: Jewish Defense League – According the the FBI report, Terrorism 2000/2001, the JDL has been classified as a “violent extremist Jewish organization”. The JDL’s stated goal has been to “protect Jews from antisemitism by whatever means necessary”. According to the FBI, the JDL has been involved in plotting and executing acts of terrorism within the United States since at least 1980.

JIDF: Jewish Internet Defense Force – JIDF is primarily concerned with fighting “anti-Semitism” and “hate speech” on the Internet.

Origins of Neoconservatism

In alliance with virtually the entire organized American Jewish community, neoconservatism is a vanguard Jewish movement with close ties to the most extreme nationalistic, aggressive, racialist and religiously fanatic elements within Israel. (MacDonald, 59)

The neoconservative movement is primarily Jewish in origin. Neoconservationism became popular among some influential Jews because many began to see leftism as detrimental to Jewish interests. Though organized Jewry had been unified in leftist causes, including communism, during the early 20th century, the movement started to fracture during the late 1920s. Many influential Jews began to see communism as harmful to Jewish interests and they believed that an open democratic society would be less restrictive. The 1960s onward saw greater inroads into the neoconservative movement as more Jews abandoned the left. One of the primary reasons was because the left had become critical of Zionism and Israeli’s attitude towards their Arab neighbors, particularly the Palestinians. Another reason was because they saw affirmative-action as being discriminatory against Jews, many of whom are highly successful in academics. And because many Jews belonged in the upper class of society, many saw leftism as harmful to high income earners.

Jewish Ethnocentricism

Jews are highly ethnocentric. They are cohesive and have strong ties to family and community. Group goals are emphasized over individual goals. Ethnocentric societies are typically collectivist and strong authoritarian leadership is valued. Ethnocentric people have high regards for people of their own kind and look upon outsiders with suspicion. They tend to have an exaggerated sense of victimization and view criticism of their people and their leaders as an attack on their entire race. They carry an “us” versus “them” attitude. Ethnocentricity likely evolved as a defense mechanism against invasion from enemy groups over territory and resources. These people evolved where the population was relatively dense and conflicts with neighbors were common. Cooperation among peers was of prime importance and there was a sense of joining together with fellow “brothers” to fight for a common cause. The ingroup-outgroup barrier is strong and impermeable. Ethnocentric people tend to have a long memory. In the case of Jews, events that happened centuries ago influence their current thinking:

Indeed, a recent article on Assyrians in the U.S. shows that many Jews have not forgiven or
forgotten events of 2,700 years ago, when the Northern Israelite kingdom was forcibly relocated
to the Assyrian capital of Nineveh:“Some Assyrians say Jews are one group of people who seem to be more familiar with them. But because the Hebrew Bible describes Assyrians as cruel and ruthless conquerors, people such as the Rev. William Nissan say he is invariably challenged by Jewish rabbis and scholars about the misdeeds of his ancestors.” (MacDonald, 10)

Jewish Neoconservatives on Anti-Semitism

Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary, a premier neoconservative journal published by the American Jewish Committee:

My own view is that what had befallen the Jews of Europe inculcated a subliminal lesson. The lesson was that anti-Semitism, even the relatively harmless genteel variety that enforced quotas against Jewish students or kept their parents from joining fashionable clubs or getting jobs in prestigious Wall Street law firms, could end in mass murder.

Nathan Glazer in 1969, commented on black anti-Semitism and the murderous urges of the New Left:

Anti-Semitism is only part of this whole syndrome, for if the members of the middle class do not deserve to hold on to their property, their positions, or even their lives, then certainly the Jews, the most middle-class of all, are going to be placed at the head of the column marked for liquidation. (MacDonald, 73)

David Horowitz:

The Middle East struggle is not about right versus right. It is about a fifty-year effort by the Arabs to destroy the Jewish state, and the refusal of the Arab states in general and the Palestinian Arabs in particular to accept Israel’s existence. The Middle East conflict is not about Israel’s occupation of the territories; it is about the refusal of the Arabs to make peace with Israel, which is an expression of their desire to destroy the Jewish state. (MacDonald, 9)

Lawrence Auster:

Now when Jews put together the idea that “all social prejudice and exclusion leads potentially to Auschwitz” with the idea that “all bigotry is indivisible,” they must reach the conclusion that any exclusion of any group, no matter how alien it may be to the host society, is a potential Auschwitz. So there it is. We have identified the core Jewish conviction that makes Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration, even the mass immigration of their deadliest enemies. In the thought-process of Jews, to keep Jew-hating Muslims out of America would be tantamount to preparing the way to another Jewish Holocaust.(MacDonald, 10)

Kim Chernin on Jewish ethnocentricism:

1. A conviction that Jews are always in danger, always have been, and therefore are in danger now. Which leads to: 2. The insistence that a criticism is an attack and will lead to our destruction. Which is rooted in: 3. The supposition that any negativity towards Jews (or Israel) is a sign of anti-Semitism and will (again, inevitably) lead to our destruction. 6. An even more hidden belief that a sufficient amount of suffering confers the right to violence. 7. The conviction that our beliefs, our ideology (or theology), matter more than the lives of other human beings. (MacDonald, 8)

Chernin on the Jewish attitude of that of being eternal victims:

Our sense of victimization as a people works in a dangerous and seditious way against our capacity to know, to recognize, to name and to remember. Since we have adopted ourselves as victims we cannot correctly read our own history let alone our present circumstances.

The Push for Democracy

Influential Jews have been heavy promoters of the fragmentation of Gentile societies. They see an open democratic society as one that is conducive towards Jewish interests. Historically organized Jewry’s biggest roadblock has been Gentile solidarity – particularly one aligned against the Jews. Nazi Germany was an extreme example of that society. A democratic society in contrast is non-discriminatory. Democracies tend to promote fragmentation and individualism. A fragmented society makes it easier for powerful ethnocentric groups to control and influence from within. By contrast autocratic societies, such as those in the Middle-East, has made it difficult for powerful outside groups to penetrate.

The media has been involved in the heavy promotion of democracy around the world. They have labeled any country that is non-democratic as the embodiment of evil. They have been labeling the War on Terror as the good fight – that of being moral democratic governments against “evil” dictatorships. Because of the European-based people’s tendency towards individualism and a simple family structure, they can more easily identify with a system of strong individual rights and representative government. Those same people are relatively easy to convince that the spread of democracy and Western values is a good idea. In contrast groups like the Arabs have evolved based on extended family and kinship based networks.

The Media

Perhaps the most telling feature of this entire state of affairs is the surreal fact that in this entire discourse Jewish identity is not mentioned. When Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, Michael Rubin, William Safire, Robert Satloff, or the legions of other prominent media figures write their reflexively pro-Israel pieces in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, or the Los Angeles Times, or opine on the Fox News Network, there is never any mention that they are Jewish Americans who have an intense ethnic interest in Israel. When Richard Perle authors a report for an Israeli think tank; is on the board of directors of an Israeli newspaper; maintains close personal ties with prominent Israelis, especially those associated with the Likud Party; has worked for an Israeli defense company; and, according to credible reports, was discovered by the FBI passing classified information to Israel—when, despite all of this, he is a central figure in the network of those pushing for wars to rearrange the entire politics of the Middle East in Israel’s favor, and with nary a soul having the courage to mention the obvious overriding Jewish loyalty apparent in Perle’s actions, that is indeed a breathtaking display of power. (MacDonald, 98)

There is no organization that is more effective in shaping the minds of the masses than the media. The owners and chairmen of most of the major media companies are Jewish. For instance NBC’s chairman, Bob Greenblatt, ABC’s chairman, Dana Walden, CBS’s chairman, Strauss Zelnick, MSNBC’s chairman, Ron Meyer, CNN’s president, Jeff Zucker, NPR’s president, Jarl Mohn, US News and World Report’s owner Mortimer Zuckerman, Time magazine’s editor-in-chief, Edward Felsenthal, and New York Times owner, the Sulzberger family, are all Jews. Being of the same background as those from Israel, they will be reluctant to criticize Israel and will not be hesitant to ostracize the perceived enemies of their people.

Biblical Prophesies?

The tenets of Zionism requires that the interpretation of Judaic scriptures be taken literally. The War on Terror may also be a plan to fulfill biblical prophecies and to expand the borders of Israel far beyond what they are now.

Genesis 15:18-20 To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates, the land of the Kenites, the Kenizzites, the Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.


Isaiah 13:4-5 A Prophecy Against Babylon (Babylon is in modern day Iraq, just south of Baghdad)

The Lord Almighty is mustering an army for war. They come from faraway lands, from the ends of the heavens—the Lord and the weapons of his wrath—to destroy the whole country.

Isaiah 17:1 A Prophecy Against Damascus

Damascus will no longer be a city but will become a heap of ruins.

Ezekiel 30:5  Cush and Libya, Lydia and all Arabia, Kub and the people of the covenant land will fall by the sword along with Egypt.

 

Conclusion

Jewish-led movements have had a long (and successful) history of crushing the opposition, with neoconservatism being an example. Organized Jewry has also had a long history of aggressively pursuing policies without compromise. Instead of offering a fair and open dialogue investigating the reasons why their relationship with Gentiles have often been so rocky, they instead automatically label any criticism of them as hate. Their solution is not to answer questions about whether their behavior and actions itself lead to anti-semitism but to automatically treat anyone critical of them as an enemy that needs to be dealt with by censorship or force.

Israeli Influence in Colombia

I just came back from a three week trip to Colombia. It was my first time to South America. I started in Cartegena, in the north, and worked my way southward to Bogota, where I flew out.

What I noticed during my travels in Colombia were the large number of backpackers from Israel and the large number of Israeli owned business. Some destinations such as Tapanga, which is on the northern coast near Santa Marta, are dominated by Israeli owned hostels and restaurants. Israelis are attracted to Colombia because it is relatively cheap and has a vibe that they like.

Salento

The Brunch restaurant

“American” owned restaurant but owner is likely of Jewish descent. The restaurant was actually pretty good. I had several meals there during my stay in Salento. There are roughly 3000 COP to one US dollar. The average meal is around $5-6.

The walls of the restaurant:

Restaurant in the Corcora valley which is about 10 miles east of Salento:

Bogota

I stayed one night in the Zohar Hostel in the historic district of Bogota. I asked the person managing the hostel about the name. He was not the owner of the hostel, but a relative of the owner. The manager was a native Colombian and spoke good English because he lived in the US for a few years. He said the name did come from a Jewish book, but he was a not a fan of the book. The manager liked some of the other Jewish books though. I did not ask whether he was Jewish or not.

I had dinner with this Israeli couple from my hotel in Medellin. They now lived in the US. They were fairly decent people and was glad I got to meet them.

the real Syrian Free Press

War Press Info ~ Archive of Most Important Reliable Global War News

The Rabbit Hole

Denying the truth doesn't change the facts.

Levant Report

the Real Middle East, debunking the sound bites

Mothman777's Blog

A different perspective, suggestions for a better way of life for a better future for all