Notes for Part II of The Transatlantic Slave Trade Video

From The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Vol I

Rosenwaike, whose Jewish population studies have been published in the major Jewish historical journals, has recently analyzed the 1971 population studies of Lee Soltow.

Rosenwaike does not dispute Soltow’s startling findings:

Soltow estimates that 36 percent of the 625,000 families in the South in 1830 were slaveholders. Of the 322 household heads identified in the present study as [Jewish] residents of the same states at this enumeration, a considerably larger proportion – 75 percent – were owners of one or more slaves.

Rosenwaike “Even more striking: two-thirds of all the Jewish families in the United States had at least one servant! Jews had clearly achieved a comfortable position in American society .” 180

Nearly all Jews in Newport had Negro domestic slaves… Bartlett, R.I. Census, 1774, shows only two Newport Jewish families without slaves.” “At the time of the Revolution, the Jewish community in Newport comprised but fifty to seventy-five Jewish families, but their wealth and prestige outstripped that of the Jewish community in New York.” 102

The smuggling business boomed after the United States prohibition on imported Africans in 1808 opened a feverish activity in the Mexican gulf area as the price for a Black male soared from $300 to $1,000 in New Orleans. 86

As many as 400 Blacks were sold in a single day and smuggled into New Orleans by Laffite and his agents. His operation was so extensive that he was said to monopolize Louisiana’s import trade and the commerce of the entire Mississippi Valley. By 1812, it was claimed that Jewish pirate Jean Laffite had become the “greatest trader in all the West.” 87

(The) test of the true Southerner was his acceptance of the institution. Southern Jews appear to have had little ambivalence on this score. Rabbi David Einhorn of Baltimore is the only prominent southern Jew who is known to have spoken out against slavery. Others either kept silent or gave wholehearted support to the Southern ideology. Dinnerstein, 121

Jacob Levin of Columbia, South Carolina and Israel I. Jones of Mobile, Alabama were leaders of their Jewish communities and among the biggest dealers of Black people of the mid-nineteenth century. One of the leading auctioneer houses of New Orleans was one operated by Levy Jacobs, who paraded Blacks on the auction block selling slaves bred right in America. 121

Slave owning was a status symbol among Jews, who held slaves in higher proportions than other Southern families – in fact by almost 2 to 1 higher. 480 Three quarters of the Jewish households in Charleston, (South Carolina) and Savannah, Georgia and one third in Baltimore, Maryland held one or more African – the average in Savannah was five – and according to the census of 1820, the average Jewish household nationwide had three slaves. 122

There appeared to be no reason, other than lack of purchase price, for a Jew to be without a Black slave. 484 Even those Jews who review American Jewry of that period prove the wealth of an individual by the number of slaves they held. Some use a high slave count as proof of Jewish industry, diligence and business prowess. 123

Virginia’s Jewry remained and prospered with little resistance from the White Gentile. They were well-respected and became pillars of their local communities. 125

It (Georgia) was the first colony that absolutely prohibited slavery from the very start and it was this feature that most severely affected the settlement. In all other colonies slavery was an established institution and in neighboring South Carolina most of the manual labor was performed by Black slaves. 131

By 1740, only three Jewish families were left in Georgia due to the slave prohibition. They left, according to Marcus, “for the same reasons the others did: Negro slavery was prohibited, the liquor traffic was forbidden.” The Earl of Egmont reported in his diary of 1741, that every one of the Jews were gone [from Savannah, Georgia] and that a Jewish wine maker named Abraham DeLyon, said he left for “the want of Negroes-whereas his white servants cost him more than he was able to afford.” 132

Finally, in October of 1741, the Trustees’ Journal reported that “there are various reports that Negroes had at last been allowed in the Colony, upon which the Jews and… others were preparing to return to the Colony.” It wasn’t until 1749, however, with the “model colony… falling apart,” that the trustees permitted slavery as well as the use of hard liquor and economic life began to flourish. 133

Civil War

“Whatever their status may have been in the South,” noted Lewis Killian, “Jewish Southerners were loyal to the Confederacy and supported slavery with greater unity than their northern coreligionists opposed it.” 158

As was to be expected, the Jewish clergy in the South, without exception, endorsed the Confederacy. These preachers, most of whom were quite recent immigrants from Germany, summoned up great passion in their defense of states’ rights. They repeated the conventional platitudes of that day, that the black race was incapable of taking care of itself, that slavery was a way of discharging the responsibility of whites toward their childlike inferiors… 143, Hertzberg

Rev. J. M. Michelbacher was completely convinced of the justice of Negro slavery, and Rabbi George Jacobs of Richmond, Virginia owned and rented slaves. Rabbi Raphall called those who opposed it “blasphemous.” Rev. A. Grunzberg of Rochester wrote a letter complaining of the “high standing politicians who are very zealous for the half-civilized Negro, [but] so illiberal against our nation.” Rabbis Simon Tuska of Memphis and James K. Gutheirn of New Orleans both defended the enslavement of Blacks to their congregations. Gutheim, the most distinguished of the South’s Jewish clergyman, chose to move his family to the home of his in-laws in Mobile rather than take an oath of allegiance to the United States and the “Dictator of Washington,” Abraham Lincoln. 556 Similarly, Rev. Henry S. Jacobs, who had served Beth Shalome of Richmond for three years (1854-1857) before moving on to Charleston, denounced Rev. Samuel Isaacs of New York for writing an appeal for loyalty to the Union.

All twenty-one Southern Jewish congregations were staunchly Confederate and of those in the North there is no record of any official rebuke of the slave system. 144

Rabbi Bernard Illowy, distinguished leader of Baltimore’s Orthodox Hebrew Congregation, defended the status quo. Though he did not preach secession he did declare his open sympathy for the secessionists and their Negro property rights:

Who can blame our brethren of the South for seceding from a society whose government cannot or will not protect the property, rights and privileges of a great portion of the Union against the encroachments of a majority misguided by some influential, ambitious aspirants and selfish politicians who, under the color of religion and the disguise of philanthropy, have thrown the country into a general state of confusion, and millions into want and poverty? 145

One of the most respected rabbis in America, Max Lilienthal of Cincinnati, “agreed with most of his colleagues that the abolitionists were incendiary radicals who were bringing the nation to the brink of disaster.” Lilienthal delivered an after-the-fact sermon on April 14, 1865, in which he publicly apologized for not having been antislavery until Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation. 146

Some rabbis were directly employed by the Confederate Army because “the Confederate Congress was more liberal and tolerant than its Washington counterparts,” regarding the appointment of Jewish chaplains in the army (italics ours). 146

It is now clear, writes Dr. Marcus, “that most antebellum Jews, those in the North as well as in the South, cared little about the moral issues of human bondage.” Jews not only accepted this doctrine, Dr. Bertram Korn admits, but “some of them helped to formulate and circulate it … Those Jews who stood against the institution were scorned and rebuked – most harshly by their own brethren in the synagogue. Even the anti-slavery Jews, opposed the spread of slavery not out of sympathy for the condition of Blacks, but because it was a threat to their jobs. For “Every sensible farmer knew that his laboriously conquered farm land would lose enormously in value if a plantation worked by Negroes could be established on the land adjoining it.”

At its height, the abolitionist movement “was more smoke than real strength.” When it ventured into the political arena as the Liberal Party it received only 65,000 votes out of a total of 2,500,000 ballots cast. 148

Jews sat out this battle over slavery in favor of the status quo resolution. In a weak nod to the edicts of their own religion, some like Louis Stix: expressed sympathy for the plight of blacks but did nothing to promote their liberation. Though he classified himself as an“outspoken” opponent of all involuntary servitude, he still advocated gradual emancipation and a government indemnity for [his] southern neighbors for their pecuniary losses in parting with their slaves. 148

No event caused the forces of bondage to rejoice more than when Rabbi Morr is Jacob Raphall of Congregation B’nai Ieshurun in New York issued a sermon that was to become known as the “Bible Defense of Slavery.” On January 4, 1861, he preached the most publicized sermon ever delivered by an American Jew up to that time. Said he:

[I]t remains a fact which cannot be gainsaid that in his own native home, and generally throughout the world, the unfortunate negro is indeed the meanest of slaves. Much had been said respecting the inferiority of his intellectual powers, and that no man of his race has ever inscribed his name on the Parthenon of human excellence, either mental or moral.

To Rabbi Raphall, slave property was placed under the same protection as any other species of lawful property. Slave ownership was not only lawful but a religious obligation. A Southern rabbi praised Raphall for “the most forceful arguments in justification of the slavery of the African race.” The Southern press played Raphall’s proclamation prominently and often, for one of the “chosen” had cleared the moral obstacle from perpetual slavocracy. The Richmond Daily Dispatch called Raphall’s proslavery doctrine, “the most powerful argument delivered.” The Charleston Mercury hailed his message as “defend[ing] us in one of the most powerful arguments put forth north or south.” After all, writes Friedenberg, “His explanation is clear, plausible, and entirely consistent with the thrust of Hebrew commentary… [and] compares favorably with the proslavery sermons delivered from Christian pulpits.” His speech was so well received that two weeks later he repeated it and raised funds for its issue as a pamphlet. Raphall was made an honorary member of the American Society for Promoting National Unity, a group of pro-slavery Northerners and Southerners whose membership included his co-religionists, Rabbis George Jacobs, James Gutheim and J. Blumenthal.

Einhorn’s eloquent rebuke of the evil institution found no sanction, however, among the Jewish community. Even as the community of abolitionists welcomed him into their ranks, the Jews of his own congregation rejected his uncompromising stand on the issue. 151

The Jewish Record of January 23, 1863:

We know not how to speak in the same breath of the Negro and the Israelite. The very names have startlingly opposite sounds – one representing all that is debased and inferior in the hopeless barbarity and heathenism of six thousand years; the other, the days when Jehovah conferred on our fathers the glorious equality which led the Eternal to converse with them, and allow them to enjoy the communion of angels. Thus the abandoned fanatics insult the choice of God himself, in endeavoring to reverse the inferiority which he stamped on the African, to make him the compeer, even in bondage, of His chosen people. There is no parallel between such races. Humanity from pole to pole would scout such a comparison. The Hebrew was originally free; and the charter of his liberty was inspired by his Creator. The Negro was never free; and his bondage in Africa was simply duplicated in a milder form when he was imported here… The judicious in all the earth agree that to proclaim the African equal to the surrounding races, would be a farce which would lead the civilized conservatism of the world to denounce the outrage. 153

Major Mordecai Manuel Noah (1785-1851) was a journalist, judge, playwright, politician and was considered the most distinguished Jewish layman until 1840. He was such a prolific proponent of slaver , that the first Black American periodical, The Freedom’s journal, was launched in response to Noah’s racist propaganda. In 1846, he offered to put up two-thirds of the money to publish a racist newspaper. He actually defended slavery by calling it liberty:

There is liberty under the name of slavery. A field negro has his cottage, his wife, and children, his easy task, his little patch of corn and potatoes, his garden and fruit, which are his revenue and property. The house servant has handsome clothing, his luxurious meals, his admitted privacy, a kind master, and an indulgent and frequently fond mistress.

He argued that “the bonds of society must be kept as they now are” and that “To emancipate the slaves would be to jeopardize the safety of the whole country.” The Freedom’s journal called Noah the Black man’s “bitterest enemy” and William Lloyd Garrison, the leading White abolitionist, called him the “lineal descendant of the monsters who nailed Jesus to the cross.” 155

In Los Angeles, the elections in the fall of 1861 fulfilled the Unionist’s fears as the Secessionists swept to victory. The News (September 6, 1861), appalled at the outcome, turned in anger upon Jewish Democrats:

The Union party has been utterly defeated in this country. Secession and disunion have carried the day and years of repentance cannot wash away the stain … Nearly the whole of the Jewish population of this city voted the secessionist ticket, and we sincerely believe many of them will live to rue the day they did so.

The Jewish community responded by branding the newspaper “anti-Semitic,” drawing from the News an angry rebuke:

It is not denied that nearly the whole of the Jewish population voted the disunion ticket… How strange does it seem then, that foreign born citizens should give their newly acquired vote and influence against the free and liberal government now in existence, and favor the schemes of Davis and his co-conspirators … The charge that we have desired to awaken religious persecution against those of the Jewish faith is false. We mention them because, comprising so large a body of our voting population, they had nearly all voted the disunion ticket. We chronicled the fact and it has not been nor cannot be denied. We advocate the rights of all men under the Constitution and Government of the United States but when the foreign born citizen violates his most solemn oath; when he turns against the Constitution which he has solemnly sworn to support, then he is to be despised.

The religious laws that reflected the superstitions of America’s founders may have had more to do with Blacks and Jews than with the propagation of any religious order … A frequent accusation leveled against the Jewish businessmen was that they encouraged the slaves to steal goods from their plantation masters for sale to the Jews who would then resell the item back to the planter. 205

David Brener: “It was a fact that many colonies had legal restrictions against the Jews, but in reality such laws were generally ignored… Very little of the traditional anti-Jewish medieval legislation took root in British North America, and so there were fewer laws that hampered Jews. The Colonies possessed no feudal heritage, developed no guilds; knew no prohibitions in the purchase of land. The only truly effective barriers here were nature herself, her savage Indians, and man’s own personal incapacity… The Jews could make progress here because there were no bounds to his freedom of movement, his freedom to settle where he wished and marry whom he would. Capital went further in America than in Europe and competition was less keen. Additionally the American Jew’s strong family ties in Europe were a boon to the import and export industry in which they would engage.” 188

Max I. Dimont: At the time of the Revolution, 50 percent of the American people were slaves or indentured servants. But the Jews were neither. They were all free. Though most were shopkeepers and craftsmen, many were manufacturers, importers, exporters, wholesalers, and slave traders. They dealt in coffee, sugar, tobacco, and molasses. They paid the same taxes non-Jews paid, and, by and large, suffered no more disabilities than other minorities did. And these disabilities, such as the lack of franchise in some of the colonies, did not affect their other freedoms. Anti-Semitism was almost nonexistent in Colonial America.” 188

Jews and the Promotion of Radical Individualism

Jews have been at the forefront of the promotion of “radical individualism”. What is referred to as radical individualism is people acting in ways that is harmful to the community. In other words it is people acting purely in their self-interest with little to no regard for their fellow men. It places the individual above the group. Jews have been promoting greed, materialism, the idea of self-importance, and the “every man for himself” mentality. They do not want to promote the type of individualism that encourages “thinking outside the box”. The Jewish-controlled media promote ideas that degenerate society through sex and pornography, interracial marriages, homosexuality, and feminism. Jews hate the idea of organization – that is Gentiles being organized. Yet they encourage their own people to remain as fiercely organized as possible.  Jews have the habit of promoting to the gentiles the exact opposite of what they themselves practice.

Libertarianism and anarchy are two ideologies that have a heavy concentration of Jewish leadership and are radically individualistic. Adam Kokesh is probably the most well-known person in the anarchy movement. The Austrian School of Economics, which promotes the abolishment of government, was founded in recognition of Ludwig Von Mises, a Jew. Some of the most prominent members of that school are Jewish including Murray Rothbard, Walter Block, George Reisman, and David Friedman.

Why Do Jews Push For Radical Individualism?

In the long run, radical individualism among gentiles and the fragmentation of gentile culture offer a superior environment for Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy, and this is indeed an important direction of current Jewish intellectual and political activity. – Kevin MacDonald in Culture of Critique

Jews are terrified of Gentile solidarity. They see gentile solidarity and gentile governments as highly opposed to Jewish interests. Indeed gentile solidarity has been primarily responsible for the persecution and expulsion of Jews over much of their history throughout Europe and other parts of the world. Leaders such as Adolph Hitler may have been the most well known man to organize a group of people. Jews have seen Arabs, who are among the most ethnocentric people in the world, as a major threat to the security of Israel and the Jewish people.

The reasons for the repeated expulsion and persecution of the Jews has much to do with the way Gentiles viewed Jewish behavior. They saw Jews as being exploiters. They saw Jews as being overly-competitive and putting Gentiles out of business. They wanted government to do something about this. Jews on the other hand have seen gentiles as getting in their way and limiting their full potential.

Individuals are little threat to highly-organized groups such as the Jews because individuals tend to mind their own business and work primarily towards personal goals. Individuals see it more as a burden than a duty to act in the interest of the people and the community. Individuals are less likely to practice racism and discrimination. In fact under free-market capitalism, a system that encourages a high amount of individualism, participants are punished for discrimination. Discrimination against potential customers harms profits which is the number one driving force under capitalism.

Another reason why Jews push for radical individualism is that individuals are more likely to spend money and be selfish with it. Because the banking and financial system is primarily Jewish owned and run they want people to spend and borrow as much as possible. They are particularly interested in transferring wealth and resources from the hands of Gentiles to the hands of Jews. Organized groups are far more efficient when it comes to sharing resources with one another. They see selfishness as harmful to group interests. On the other hand individualists are more likely to depend on the system for their needs. They are more likely to live a discrete atomized lifestyle and are primarily concerned for themselves. Look at the way Mexicans in the US go about their daily lives. Mexicans are experts in networking. A lot of Mexicans only do business with other Mexicans and avoid the “system”. I personally know of a Mexican family who run a lucrative home rental business and do not even use a bank.



Bertram Korn on the Jewish Slave Trade

All quotes are from Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South by rabbi Bertram Korn published by the Reform Congregation Keneseth Israel in 1961.

Very few Jews spoke out against slavery

Jews participated in every aspect and process of the exploitation of the defenseless blacks. (p34)

Slave-dealing obviously did not disqualify Jews from receiving the friendship and esteem of their co-religionists any more than it disqualified Christians; engaging in business transactions in Negro flesh was not regarded as incompatible with being a good Jew. (43)

The largest Jewish slave-trading firm in the South seems to have been the Davis family of Petersburg and Richmond, including Ansley, Benjamin, George, and Solomon.” They were the only Jews mentioned by Harriett Beecher Stowe in her little-known commentary, “A Key to Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. Mrs. Stowe quotes a letter by Dr. Gamaliel Bailey, referring to them:

“The Davises, in Petersburg, are the great slave-traders. They are Jews, came to that place many years ago as poor peddlers . . . These men are always in the market, giving the highest price for slaves. During the summer and fall they buy them up at low prices, trim, shave, wash them, fatten them so that they may look sleek, and sell them to great profit.” (47)

Chapter 8, Opinions of Jews About Slavery

Page 57:

This study has thus far traced a pattern of almost complete conformity to the slave society of the Old South on the part of its Jewish citizens. They participated in the buying, owning, and selling of slaves, and the exploitation of their labor, along with their neighbors. The behavior of Jews towards slaves seems to have been indistinguishable from that of their non-Jewish friends.

No Jewish political figure of the Old South ever expressed any reservations about the justice of slavery or the rightness of the Southern position. Men like David Levy Yulee of Florida and David S. Kaufman of Texas were typical exponents of Southern views on states’ rights and the spread of slavery.

Pages 59-63:

Nor was there anyone among the many Jewish journalists, writers, and publicists of the Old South who questioned the moral, political, or economic justice of slavery. Jacob De Cordova, the Texas real-estate promoter, newspaper editor and geographer, emphatically denied charges that he had given voice to “free-soil doctrines” during his 1858 lecture tour in the North, and “wish[ed] it distinctly understood that our feelings and education have always been pro-slavery.” Isaac Harby, the Charleston dramatist and political essayist, was writing in Charleston in opposition to “the abolitionist society and its secret branches,” as early as 1824. Jacob N. Cardozo, the editor and political economist, asserted that slavery was defensible both economically and morally. In the former respect, he maintained that

“Slavery brought not only great wealth to the South, but to the slaves a greater share of its enjoyment that in many regions where the relation between employer and employee was based on wages.”

In regard to the ethical question, he placed the responsibility squarely on the Deity: “The reason the Almighty made the colored black is to prove their inferiority.” After the Civil War, in his well- known Reminiscences of Charleston, Cardozo expressed his sympathy with the planters who were now suffering great privation:

“The owner of two hundred to five hundred slaves, with a princely income, has not only to submit to the most degraded employments, but he frequently cannot obtain them. In some instances, he has to drive a cart, or attend a retail grocery, while he may have to obey the orders of an ignorant and course menial. There is something unnatural in this reverse of position — something revolting to my sense of propriety in this social degradation.”‘

Edwin De Odeon, the journalist and Confederate diplomat, devoted many pages of his reminiscences to an extended apologia for slavery. His brother, Thomas Cooper De Leon, one of the most prolific Southern litterateurs of the second half of the nineteenth century, wrote many novels and other works in the Southern romantic style of which he was a major practitioner. In one of his most famous works, Belles, Peaux and Brains of the Confederacy, De Leon described all talk of cruelty in the slave system as propaganda and mythology; he underlined the fact that Harriett Beecher Stowe was compelled to ascribe a Yankee origin to her famous character, Simon Legree. Samuel Mordecai, the bachelor journalist of Richmond, derived part of his income from his articles in Edmund Ruffin’s The Farmer’s Register, a journal devoted primarily to the interests of Southern employers of slave labor forces. Mordecai loved everything about old Virginia, and wrote tenderly of the old colored aristocracy, in his Richmond in By-Gone-Days. He too regarded slavery as a natural and desirable condition of society.

Even in the days of the secession crisis, and the subsequent prolongated war and eventual defeat, many Southern Jews believed slavery to be indispensable to their happiness and security. George W. Mordecai, born a Jew but now an Episcopalian banker, railroad executive, and plantation owner in North Carolina, wrote to a Northern Republican in Dec 1860:

“I would much sooner trust myself alone on my plantation surrounded by my slaves, than in one of your large manufacturing towns when your laborers are discharged from employment and crying aloud for bread for themselves and their little ones.”

In 1864, Private Eugene Henry Levy of the Confederate Army objected to the radical suggestion that Negroes be utilized in the war effort and be freed for this assistance. “The slaves,” he said, “are in their proper sphere as they are at present situated within the boundaries of the Confederacy.”

After the war was over, some Southern Jews still believed that slavery had been a necessary foundation of human society. Eleanor H. Cohen, the daughter of Dr. Philip Melvin Cohen of Charleston, said in the innocent selfishness of young maidenhood:

“I, who believe in the institution of slavery, regret deeply its being abolished. I am accustomed to have them wait on me, and I dislike white servants very much.”

Perhaps no more concise and self-deceptive rationalization of slavery was ever written than the observations which were recorded by Solomon Cohen, the distinguished civic leader and merchant of Savannah, who had lost a son in the war, in a letter which he wrote to his sister-in-law, Emma Mordecai, shortly after the end of the war:

“I believe that the institution of slavery was refining and civilizing to the whites — giving them an elevation of sentiment and ease and dignity of manners only attainable in societies under the restraining influence of a privileged class — and at the same time the only human institution that could elevate the Negro from barbarism and develop the small amount of intellect with which he is endowed.”

Such sentiments might well be expected of members of families long resident in the South and thoroughly acclimated to its habits and assumptions. The De Leon’s, Mordecai’s, and Cardozo’s had lived with their neighbors long enough to share their ideas and attitudes. But what of the newly immigrant German Jews who came to the South in increasing numbers beginning in the 1840’s? There is no evidence that they found it very difficult to adjust to the slave society of which they became a part. Julius Weis, of New Orleans, who came to the United States in 1845, recorded his shock at his first sight of a Negro

“being whipped upon his bare back by an overseer. The right of a human being punished in this manner was very repugnant to me, though living in the midst of a country where slavery existed. I afterwards got somewhat accustomed to it, but I always felt a pity for the poor slaves.”

But Weis’ compassion seemed to be limited to this matter of punishment, for he owned several slaves during the period from 1853 to 1857, and bought a Negro barber in 1862. He notes that “I never found it necessary to punish them in such a manner,” but his feeling of pity never led him to adopt a critical attitude toward the entire system of slavery.

Louis Stix of Cincinnati wrote of a German Jewish immigrant to the South who became violent in his pro-slavery opinions. They met at a Jewish boarding-house in New York City; at dinner one night this unidentified Southern Jew said that “Southerners could not live without slavery.” “I replied to this,” wrote Stix, “by a very uncalled-for remark not at all flattering to our race who were living in the South . . . The Southerner . . . drew his pistol to compel me to take back my words . . . I hope [he] has since learned to do without slaves, or has returned to the place from which he came, where he was almost a slave himself.””‘ But such a direct application of logic from Jewish experience in Europe to the situation of the Negroes in the South could only stem from the mind of a Northern Jew; it was never, to my knowledge, expressed in such blunt terms by a Southern Jew. To the contrary, the average Southern Jew would probably have agreed with Aaron Hirsch, who came to the United States in 1847 and worked through Mississippi and Arkansas, and who said that

“the institution of Slavery as it existed in the South was not so great a wrong as people believe. The Negroes were brought here in a savage state; they captured and ate each other in their African home. Here they were instructed to work, were civilized and got religion, and were perfectly happy.”

Some Southern Jews, however, did not deceive themselves into thinking that the Negro slaves were “perfectly happy.” These sensitive spirits were appalled at human exploitation of the life and labor of other human beings. Most of them reacted in a purely personal way, by avoiding the owning of slaves or by helping slaves. Major Alfred Mordecai of the United States Army, reared in the South and brother to planters and defenders of slavery, purchased only one slave in his life, simply to emancipate her. He believed that slavery was “the greatest misfortune and curse that could have befallen us.” Yet he would do nothing to oppose slavery, and when the lines were drawn, he resigned his commission rather than fight for the North, without being willing to take up arms for the South.

In Betram Korn’s other book, The Jews of the Confederacy, Betram quotes Alfred Mordecai, a Jewish army general:

[I have] a sort of repugnance to the Negroes which has increased upon me as I have been less and less associated with them. Therefore, I have never wished to make a home among them. This feeling is, naturally enough, much stronger on the part of my family; we have seldom spoken of it, but I am sure that it would be utterly repugnant to the feelings of my wife and daughters to live among slaves, and if it can be avoided, I should be extremely loathe to oblige them, by residence and habit, to overcome this repugnance, even supposing it possible… I have no doubt that the race is in a better condition here than they are as savages in Africa, or than they would be as free men, from all the experience we have seen. But I never wished to be one of the agents in thus bettering their condition… and I am utterly averse to any participation in the schemes for destroying or weakening the hold of the masters on their slaves, unless they themselves are willing to abandon it. (Korn, The Jews of the Confederacy)

In his letter of March 17, 1861 to brother Samuel, Alfred Mordecai defended slavery as a constitutional right:

it appears to be sufficient to know that at the formation of our government slavery existed all over the land and was expressly protected by the Constitution from being interfered with by any authority but the states themselves; that therefore the people who have retained it are entitled to the enforcement of their constitutional rights with regard to it both in the letter and the spirit. (Korn, The Jews of the Confederacy)

Despite Rabbi Korn’s extensive documentation on the Jewish participation in black slavery in America, Korn appears to be apologetic. He believes that Jews were no different than their white-Gentile counterparts in the way they bought and sold and treated black slaves. Korn believed that because Jews were a small minority of the early American population they were heavily influenced by the customs and behaviors of the host population and they simply engaged in a practice that was widely accepted at the time. Korn like many Jews are self-deceptive. The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews extensively documents, with mainly Jewish sources, that Jews had been involved in all aspects of the Trans-american slave trade and that if it wasn’t for them, the trade slave would like have never happened. Kudos for Korn exposing the Jews in the slave trade, something few other Jews would do. But he needs to go further and not be afraid to uncover who the ringleaders were behind the whole thing.

The Real Reasons for Suburbanization

Many recognize the problems of a spread out lifestyle, which is particularly common in America: traffic congestion, long commute times, the destruction of natural open spaces, and a lower social atmosphere. The post-war period has seen the exodus of families from dense urban environments into low density communities. Many of the once thriving urban communities have turned into ghost towns of abandoned homes, crime, and filth. Despite the problems suburbanization has caused, few have publicly voiced complaints. The few who have shown concern normally give the reasons for suburbanization and sprawl as having to do with low taxes, cheap land, and the “inherent” desire of Americans wanting more space and bigger things. None of those are the real reasons. The main reasons for suburbanization is to maximize consumer spending, to discourages organization, and to distract the masses. Many people recognize those things but instead of seeing it as the reasons they see it as some accidental consequences. Folks, there are few things in this world that happen by accident. This was intentional and was designed to benefit the corporations, the government, the bankers, and the Jewish establishment.

Suburbanization Maximizes Spending and Consumption.

Anytime you watch the news, one of the main themes is that of the economy and the need to get people to spend, spend, and spend. To them there is no such thing as too much growth. Any deficit in the economy is viewed as something sinister and must be stopped. Suburbanization maximizes spending and resource consumption. The shear amount of resources used to create this highly individualistic atomized lifestyle is mind boggling. Think about the amount of building materials, the amount of motor vehicles, the amount of fuel to commute, the number of motor vehicle repair and maintenance facilities, the number of lawn care equipment, the millions of miles of concrete and tar for the roads, etc. Because the living spaces are often larger in a low density setting, there is more energy that is required to heat and cool the homes and there is more furnishings and belongings that seek to occupy those large living spaces.

Suburbanization also discourages the sharing of resources. Tools, lawn care equipment, and recreational equipment (boats, bicycles, etc) could be shared but instead are being repeated for each home. A lot of those things sit around being unused most of the time. Obviously, someone is making a lot of money from this system.

Suburbanization Encourages Materialism and Decreases Spiritualism

Suburbanization encourages materialism, flaunting of wealth, and “keeping up with the Jones”. People are more likely to show-off their status by having nice vehicles, manicured lawns, and large decorated stately homes than if they lived in densely populated areas where there are fewer opportunities to show-off. In fact many see material goods as a way to make up for the lack of a genuine social life. Because of the fewer opportunities for genuine friendships many make up for it by excessive television and movie watching which encourages even more materialism.

Suburbanization Keeps A Person Distracted

Think about the amount of time it takes to care for a large house with a large lawn and all the material goodies in that house. And think about when it comes time to move, the sheer amount of time a couple spends hunting for their next home and starting the process over again. Since suburbanization increases distraction, suburbanization also increases apathy towards the real problems in our world. Most people won’t give a damn about anything as long as their personal situation is satisfied. They’ll care less about the sufferings of their neighbors and the world in general.

Suburbanization Destroys A Sense of Community

Suburbanization discourages community and encourages radical individualism. This point is very important. The ones who are enslaving us are not just merely elites who happen to be rich and powerful. They are a mafia. They are very cohesive and ethnocentric but discourage us common folks from acting the same because they don’t want competition. (If you have glanced at any of my other posts you know which group I’m talking about.) It is solidarity of the commoners that has historically given the establishment the most problem in enslaving the masses. Groups are far more powerful than individuals and individuals are easier to enslave. Individuals tend to mind their own business and focus only on personal goals. Sprawl makes it very difficult for citizens to effectively organize and makes it especially difficult to organize against the establishment. Sprawl discourages people from brainstorming together to solve problems and instead encourages them to turn to the system (i.e. corporations, government, media, and police). People tend to have a high sense of mistrust among one another in a suburban type of setting.

Suburbanization Increases Stress

Suburbanization increases social isolation and decreases social skills and a sense of trust among one another. Millions of Americans suffer from loneliness and depression. Millions of Americans spend billions of dollars on counseling, therapy, and drugs (legal and illegal). This is yet another way the elites are profiting and ties in with the first point in regards to increased consumerism.

Laws Prevent Communal Living

To create the spread out lifestyle requires many laws. There are laws separating residential and commercial areas, laws to maintain the number of parking spaces per square footage of business space, laws that regulate the distances from the front door of a house to the road, laws that regulate the size of the lot a home is to be built on, etc. All this discourages walking and encourages the use of cars.

Had enough? Want to step away from this enslavement? Check out these two programs below:



Zionism and the War on Terror

Zionism and the War on Terror

This essay deals with Kevin MacDonald’s book Understanding Jewish Influence (2004) (recently banned on Amazon but can be found on MacDonald was a professor of psychology at California State University-Long Beach. He has a number of books and papers examining the role that influential Jews have played in shaping academia, the media, and foreign policy. MacDonald’s best known work, The Culture of Critique, also banned on Amazon, explains how influential Jews have been key figures in shaping the social sciences, academic think-tanks, and numerous civil rights organizations such as the NAACP, ACLU, and SPLC. Understanding Jewish Influence discusses Jews in the neoconservative movement. In this book MacDonald documents that the War on Terror and America’s numerous entanglements in the Middle-East originates from powerful Jewish and pro-Israeli interests. The neoconservative movement is primarily concerned with protecting the state of Israel.

(Unless otherwise stated, quotes are from Understanding Jewish Influence.)

In the contemporary world, organized American Jewish lobbying groups and deeply committed Jews in the Bush administration and the media are behind the pro-Israel U.S. foreign policy that is leading to war against virtually the entire Arab world. – Kevin MacDonald


In order to understand the current Middle-Eastern conflict you have to understand the history of the region. There has been a virtual conflict between Israel and the surrounding Arab states since the founding of modern-day Israel in 1948. It is essentially an ethnic war between the Jews and the Arabs. Both groups of people are highly ethnocentric. Both groups of people are intensely committed to their people and their land. Both groups of people see their people as one big family in their struggle for a common cause.

Some of the more notable conflicts in that region over the past half-century have been the the Six-Day War of 1967, the Yom-Kippur war of 1973, the Iran-Iraq war during the 1980s, the Gulf War of the 1990s, and the present War on Terror. Zionist leaders have long been intent on transforming the politics of the Middle-East to produce Arab leaders that are on good terms with Israel.

Proposals for regime change, such as found in “A Clean Break,” have a long history in Israeli thought. For example, in 1982 Israeli strategist Oded Yinon echoed a long line of Israeli strategists who argued that Israel should attempt to dissolve all the existing Arab states into smaller, less potentially powerful states. These states would then become clients of Israel as a regional imperial power. Neocons have advertised the war in Iraq as a crusade for a democratic, secular, Western-oriented, pro-Israel Iraq. (MacDonald, p 89)

(The) Balkanization of Iraq was always an acceptable outcome, because Israel would then find itself surrounded by small Arab countries worried about each other instead of forming a solid block against Israel. (MacDonald, 89)

Anwar Sadat of Egypt became the first Arab leader to recognize Israel by signing the Camp David Accords in 1978. Sixteen years later Jordan became the second Arab country to sign a peace treaty with Israel. Several other Arab countries followed including Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the UAE.

The War on Terror

The events of 9/11 have given the West an initiative for rearranging the politics of the Middle-East:

Intensely committed Zionists with close links to Israel occupy prominent positions in the Bush administration, especially in the Department of Defense and on the staff of Vice President Dick Cheney. The long-term consequence of Zionism is that the U.S. is on the verge of attempting to completely transform the Arab/Muslim world to produce governments that accept Israel and whatever fate it decides for the Palestinians, and, quite possibly, to set the stage for further Israeli expansionism. (MacDonald, 32)

Below are some of the key players that have abetted the “War on Terror” and were highly influential members of the Bush administration. It is important to point out that all those listed in this section are Jews.

Richard Perle – (Chairman Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board)

(The) defining moment in our history was certainly the Holocaust…. It was the destruction, the genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering…We don’t want that to happen again…when we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so, because when we fail to do so, the results are catastrophic. – Perle on BBC’s Panorama

Expelled from Senator Henry Jackson’s office in the 70’s after the NSA caught him passing highly-classified documents to the Israeli Embassy. He is a close friend of the former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon and the current prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Perle had many ties to Israeli defense companies such as Soltan and Onset Technology.

Perle is listed as a Resident Fellow of the AEI (American Enterprise Institute), and he is on the boards of directors of the Jerusalem Post and the Hollinger Corporation, a media company controlled by Conrad Black. Hollinger owns major mediaproperties in the U.S. (Chicago Sun-Times), England (the Daily Telegraph), Israel (Jerusalem Post), and Canada (the National Post; 50 percent ownership with CanWest Global Communications, which is controlled by Israel Asper and his family; CanWest has aggressively clamped down on its journalists for any deviation from its strong pro-Israel editorial policies19). (MacDonald, 64)

Paul Wolfowitz – (Deputy Defense Secretary) Was the number two leader within the administration behind the Iraq war mongering.

Within the George H. W. Bush administration, Wolfowitz was “the intellectual godfather and fiercest advocate for toppling Saddam.”199 Wolfowitz has become famous as a key advocate for war with Iraq rather than Afghanistan in the immediate aftermath of September 11. (MacDonald, 87)

Like many listed here, Wolfowitz has a strong Jewish identity. His father Jacob was a life long Zionist and his sister is married to an Israeli and lives in Israel. Wolfowitz can read Hebrew.

Former CIA political analysts Kathleen and Bill Christison note that “One source inside the administration has described [Wolfowitz] frankly as ‘over-the-top crazy when it comes to Israel.’” (Christison & Christison 2003)

Douglas Feith – (Under Secretary of Defense for Rumsfeld) Feith is closely associated with the Zionist Organization of America, which even attacks Jews that don’t agree with its extremist views. Feith, like many other Jewish neocons has been suspected on spying for Israel. Feith has advocated regime change in Iraq since at least the late 1980s. He was responsible for creating the OSP (Office of Special Plans), where much of the fraudulent intelligence was manufactured that justified the attack on Iraq.

Elliott Abrams – (National Security Council Advisor) Was Bush’s top Middle East adviser. Played an important role in the Iran-Contra Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to fight Iraq. He is closely associated with the radical Israeli Likud party.

Abrams acknowledges that the mainstream Jewish community “clings to what is at bottom a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts.” (MacDonald, 90)

Michael Ledeen (special adviser to Wolfowitz). In his book, War on the Terror Masters, Ledeen discloses:

Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission….

Scooter Libby – (Cheney’s Chief of Staff) was recently found guilty of lying to Federal investigators in the Valerie Plame affair, in which Plame, a covert CIA agent, was exposed for political revenge by the Bush administration following her husband’s revelations about the lies leading to the Iraq War.

Joshua Bolton – (White House Deputy Chief of Staff) Accused Syria of having a nuclear program, so that they can attack Syria after Iraq

Ari Fleischer – (White House Spokesman) Is closely connected to Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, who follow the Kabbalah, and hold very extremist and insulting views of non-Jews.

Henry Kissinger – (Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board) Was responsible for wars that killed up to 6 million in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia during the 1970s

Eliot Cohen – (Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board) Openly admitted his hatred of Islam claiming that Islam should be the enemy, not terrorism

David Frum – (Bush’s speechwriter) Writer behind the “Axis of Evil” label. He lumped together all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war

Dov Zakheim – (foreign policy adviser) Co-author of the 1997 Project for the New American Century (PNAC) paper on rebuilding America’s defenses, advocated the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern nations.

Michael Chertoff – (Homeland Security) Co-author of the Patriot Act.

Gentiles in the Movement

Gentiles are encouraged to be in highly visible roles, mainly to lesson the appearance of the movement being overly Jewish.

Dick Cheney – A close associate of Wolfowitz, Cheney has long ties with Jewish neocons.

Both Cheney and Rumsfeld have been associated with Bill Kristol’s PNAC (which advocated a unilateral war for regime change in Iraq at least as early as 1998) and the CSP, two neocon think tanks; Cheney was presented with the ADL’s Distinguished Statesman Award in 1993 and was described by Abraham Foxman as “sensitive to Jewish concerns.” When Cheney was a Congressman during the early 1980s, he attended lunches hosted for Republican Jewish leaders by the House leadership. … He was also a member of JINSA, a major pro-Israel activist organization, until assuming his office as vice president. (MacDonald, 93)

Following the Soviet Union collapse, he and Wolfowitz attempted to draft in 1992, the Defense Planning Guidance, which advocated America’s dominance all throughout Eurasia and threatened any country that planned to challenge the US’s global hegemony. As head of the transition team for the Bush administration, he and Scooter Libby were responsible for stocking the subcabinet level with neocons.

Israel’s fight against terrorism is our fight. Israel’s victory is an important part of our victory. For reasons both moral and strategic, we need to stand with Israel in its fight against terrorism.

– Dick Cheney, April 3, 2002

Donald Rumsfeld – Has had long history of appealing to Jewish and Israeli causes.

In his 1964 campaign for reelection to Congress as representative from a district on the North Shore of Chicago with an important Jewish constituency, he emphasized Soviet persecution of Jews and introduced a bill on this topic in the House. After the 1967 war, he urged the U.S. not to demand that Israel withdraw to its previous borders and he criticized delays in sending U.S. Military hardware to Israel. (MacDonald, 95)

Rumsfeld however has been less committed to the War on Terror compared to his colleagues.

Despite these links with neoconservatives and Jewish causes, Rumsfeld emerges as less an
ideologue and less a passionate advocate for war with Iraq than Cheney. Robert Woodward
describes him as lacking the feverish intensity of Cheney, as a dispassionate “defense
technocrat” who, unlike Cheney, Wolfowitz, and Feith, would have been content if the U.S. had
not gone to war with Iraq.- (MacDonald, 95)

Zionist Organizations

These are some of the Pro-Israel organizations that have a powerful influence in our government and media:

ADL: Anti-defamation League of B’nai B’rith – Part of the ADL’s mission statement is “We fight anti-Semitism and all forms of hate. We advocate for a safe and secure democratic Jewish State of Israel and combat efforts to delegitimize it.” Essentially the ADL, like so many Jewish organization, has worked tirelessly in squelching free speech. The ADL has worked hand-in-hand with major media outlets to censor anything critical of Israel.

AIPAC: America Israel Public Affairs Committee – The most powerful lobbying group in Washington. AIPAC consistently pushes for hawkish foreign policies in the interest of Israel and intimidates any politician who has criticisms of Israel or votes against policies that are in Israel’s favor

CSP: Center for Security Policy—Neoconservative think tank specializing in defense policy; formerly headed by Douglas Feith (Jewish), CSP is now headed by Frank Gaffney (Jewish); the CSP is strongly pro-Israel and favors a strong U.S. Military

JINSA: Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs—Pro-Israel think tank specializing in promoting military cooperation between the U.S. and Israel

MEF: Middle East Forum — Headed by Daniel Pipes (Jewish), the MEF is a pro-Israel advocacy organization. They are behind Campus Watch, an organization that monitors university professors who criticize Israel. The MEF (along with the ADL, American Jewish Committee, and American Jewish Congress) were able to convince the US House to approve a bill that authorized monitoring of Middle-Eastern studies throughout US universities.

PNAC: Project for the New American Century—Headed by Bill Kristol (Jewish), the PNAC issues letters and statements signed mainly by prominent neocons and designed to influence public policy

ZOA: Zionist Organization of America – Pro-Israel lobbying organization associated with the more fanatical end of the pro-Israel spectrum in America.

These two other organizations, though not having significant influence in Washington, is worth noting:

JDL: Jewish Defense League – According the the FBI report, Terrorism 2000/2001, the JDL has been classified as a “violent extremist Jewish organization”. The JDL’s stated goal has been to “protect Jews from antisemitism by whatever means necessary”. According to the FBI, the JDL has been involved in plotting and executing acts of terrorism within the United States since at least 1980.

JIDF: Jewish Internet Defense Force – JIDF is primarily concerned with fighting “anti-Semitism” and “hate speech” on the Internet.

Origins of Neoconservatism

In alliance with virtually the entire organized American Jewish community, neoconservatism is a vanguard Jewish movement with close ties to the most extreme nationalistic, aggressive, racialist and religiously fanatic elements within Israel. (MacDonald, 59)

The neoconservative movement is primarily Jewish in origin. Neoconservationism became popular among some influential Jews because many began to see leftism as detrimental to Jewish interests. Though organized Jewry had been unified in leftist causes, including communism, during the early 20th century, the movement started to fracture during the late 1920s. Many influential Jews began to see communism as harmful to Jewish interests and they believed that an open democratic society would be less restrictive. The 1960s onward saw greater inroads into the neoconservative movement as more Jews abandoned the left. One of the primary reasons was because the left had become critical of Zionism and Israeli’s attitude towards their Arab neighbors, particularly the Palestinians. Another reason was because they saw affirmative-action as being discriminatory against Jews, many of whom are highly successful in academics. And because many Jews belonged in the upper class of society, many saw leftism as harmful to high income earners.

Jewish Ethnocentricism

Jews are highly ethnocentric. They are cohesive and have strong ties to family and community. Group goals are emphasized over individual goals. Ethnocentric societies are typically collectivist and strong authoritarian leadership is valued. Ethnocentric people have high regards for people of their own kind and look upon outsiders with suspicion. They tend to have an exaggerated sense of victimization and view criticism of their people and their leaders as an attack on their entire race. They carry an “us” versus “them” attitude. Ethnocentricity likely evolved as a defense mechanism against invasion from enemy groups over territory and resources. These people evolved where the population was relatively dense and conflicts with neighbors were common. Cooperation among peers was of prime importance and there was a sense of joining together with fellow “brothers” to fight for a common cause. The ingroup-outgroup barrier is strong and impermeable. Ethnocentric people tend to have a long memory. In the case of Jews, events that happened centuries ago influence their current thinking:

Indeed, a recent article on Assyrians in the U.S. shows that many Jews have not forgiven or
forgotten events of 2,700 years ago, when the Northern Israelite kingdom was forcibly relocated
to the Assyrian capital of Nineveh:“Some Assyrians say Jews are one group of people who seem to be more familiar with them. But because the Hebrew Bible describes Assyrians as cruel and ruthless conquerors, people such as the Rev. William Nissan say he is invariably challenged by Jewish rabbis and scholars about the misdeeds of his ancestors.” (MacDonald, 10)

Jewish Neoconservatives on Anti-Semitism

Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary, a premier neoconservative journal published by the American Jewish Committee:

My own view is that what had befallen the Jews of Europe inculcated a subliminal lesson. The lesson was that anti-Semitism, even the relatively harmless genteel variety that enforced quotas against Jewish students or kept their parents from joining fashionable clubs or getting jobs in prestigious Wall Street law firms, could end in mass murder.

Nathan Glazer in 1969, commented on black anti-Semitism and the murderous urges of the New Left:

Anti-Semitism is only part of this whole syndrome, for if the members of the middle class do not deserve to hold on to their property, their positions, or even their lives, then certainly the Jews, the most middle-class of all, are going to be placed at the head of the column marked for liquidation. (MacDonald, 73)

David Horowitz:

The Middle East struggle is not about right versus right. It is about a fifty-year effort by the Arabs to destroy the Jewish state, and the refusal of the Arab states in general and the Palestinian Arabs in particular to accept Israel’s existence. The Middle East conflict is not about Israel’s occupation of the territories; it is about the refusal of the Arabs to make peace with Israel, which is an expression of their desire to destroy the Jewish state. (MacDonald, 9)

Lawrence Auster:

Now when Jews put together the idea that “all social prejudice and exclusion leads potentially to Auschwitz” with the idea that “all bigotry is indivisible,” they must reach the conclusion that any exclusion of any group, no matter how alien it may be to the host society, is a potential Auschwitz. So there it is. We have identified the core Jewish conviction that makes Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration, even the mass immigration of their deadliest enemies. In the thought-process of Jews, to keep Jew-hating Muslims out of America would be tantamount to preparing the way to another Jewish Holocaust.(MacDonald, 10)

Kim Chernin on Jewish ethnocentricism:

1. A conviction that Jews are always in danger, always have been, and therefore are in danger now. Which leads to: 2. The insistence that a criticism is an attack and will lead to our destruction. Which is rooted in: 3. The supposition that any negativity towards Jews (or Israel) is a sign of anti-Semitism and will (again, inevitably) lead to our destruction. 6. An even more hidden belief that a sufficient amount of suffering confers the right to violence. 7. The conviction that our beliefs, our ideology (or theology), matter more than the lives of other human beings. (MacDonald, 8)

Chernin on the Jewish attitude of that of being eternal victims:

Our sense of victimization as a people works in a dangerous and seditious way against our capacity to know, to recognize, to name and to remember. Since we have adopted ourselves as victims we cannot correctly read our own history let alone our present circumstances.

The Push for Democracy

Influential Jews have been heavy promoters of the fragmentation of Gentile societies. They see an open democratic society as one that is conducive towards Jewish interests. Historically organized Jewry’s biggest roadblock has been Gentile solidarity – particularly one aligned against the Jews. Nazi Germany was an extreme example of that society. A democratic society in contrast is non-discriminatory. Democracies tend to promote fragmentation and individualism. A fragmented society makes it easier for powerful ethnocentric groups to control and influence from within. By contrast autocratic societies, such as those in the Middle-East, has made it difficult for powerful outside groups to penetrate.

The media has been involved in the heavy promotion of democracy around the world. They have labeled any country that is non-democratic as the embodiment of evil. They have been labeling the War on Terror as the good fight – that of being moral democratic governments against “evil” dictatorships. Because of the European-based people’s tendency towards individualism and a simple family structure, they can more easily identify with a system of strong individual rights and representative government. Those same people are relatively easy to convince that the spread of democracy and Western values is a good idea. In contrast groups like the Arabs have evolved based on extended family and kinship based networks.

The Media

Perhaps the most telling feature of this entire state of affairs is the surreal fact that in this entire discourse Jewish identity is not mentioned. When Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, Michael Rubin, William Safire, Robert Satloff, or the legions of other prominent media figures write their reflexively pro-Israel pieces in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, or the Los Angeles Times, or opine on the Fox News Network, there is never any mention that they are Jewish Americans who have an intense ethnic interest in Israel. When Richard Perle authors a report for an Israeli think tank; is on the board of directors of an Israeli newspaper; maintains close personal ties with prominent Israelis, especially those associated with the Likud Party; has worked for an Israeli defense company; and, according to credible reports, was discovered by the FBI passing classified information to Israel—when, despite all of this, he is a central figure in the network of those pushing for wars to rearrange the entire politics of the Middle East in Israel’s favor, and with nary a soul having the courage to mention the obvious overriding Jewish loyalty apparent in Perle’s actions, that is indeed a breathtaking display of power. (MacDonald, 98)

There is no organization that is more effective in shaping the minds of the masses than the media. The owners and chairmen of most of the major media companies are Jewish. For instance NBC’s chairman, Bob Greenblatt, ABC’s chairman, Dana Walden, CBS’s chairman, Strauss Zelnick, MSNBC’s chairman, Ron Meyer, CNN’s president, Jeff Zucker, NPR’s president, Jarl Mohn, US News and World Report’s owner Mortimer Zuckerman, Time magazine’s editor-in-chief, Edward Felsenthal, and New York Times owner, the Sulzberger family, are all Jews. Being of the same background as those from Israel, they will be reluctant to criticize Israel and will not be hesitant to ostracize the perceived enemies of their people.

Biblical Prophesies?

The tenets of Zionism requires that the interpretation of Judaic scriptures be taken literally. The War on Terror may also be a plan to fulfill biblical prophecies and to expand the borders of Israel far beyond what they are now.

Genesis 15:18-20 To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates, the land of the Kenites, the Kenizzites, the Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.

Isaiah 13:4-5 A Prophecy Against Babylon (Babylon is in modern day Iraq, just south of Baghdad)

The Lord Almighty is mustering an army for war. They come from faraway lands, from the ends of the heavens—the Lord and the weapons of his wrath—to destroy the whole country.

Isaiah 17:1 A Prophecy Against Damascus

Damascus will no longer be a city but will become a heap of ruins.

Ezekiel 30:5  Cush and Libya, Lydia and all Arabia, Kub and the people of the covenant land will fall by the sword along with Egypt.



Jewish-led movements have had a long (and successful) history of crushing the opposition, with neoconservatism being an example. Organized Jewry has also had a long history of aggressively pursuing policies without compromise. Instead of offering a fair and open dialogue investigating the reasons why their relationship with Gentiles have often been so rocky, they instead automatically label any criticism of them as hate. Their solution is not to answer questions about whether their behavior and actions itself lead to anti-semitism but to automatically treat anyone critical of them as an enemy that needs to be dealt with by censorship or force.

Eustace Mullins’ Curse of Canaan is Disinformation

I read The Curse of Canaan a couple years ago based on recommendations from fans of Eustace Mullins. Many of his fans are deep into New World Order conspiracies and in particular the Jewish question. C of C is probably Mullins’ best known work. At that time I was just getting into the JQ. I have to say I was highly disappointed with the book – whether it was back then or now. It was sloppily researched, had numerous editing problems, and had little in the way of documentation and references cited. Now that I know much more about the JQ, especially in regards to the bible, I can confidently say that Mullins is a gatekeeper. I am going to dissect only the first chapter (The War Against Shem) of the book. I don’t have the time, nor do I think it is necessary to dissect the entire book. I have to say this book was an insult to my intelligence. The entire thesis of the book is that it was the Canaanites (instead of the Israelites) who are behind the world order and that world order started around biblical times and continues to this day. On page 32 of C of C:

The Will of Canaan today remains the operating instructions of the Canaanite heirs, who presently control the World Order.

Now I don’t know whether the Canaanites were real groups of people or whether they were metaphors for certain groups of people. Mullins makes his case with sloppy research, taking passages out of context, and pulling things out of thin air like a magician. According to Mullins, the Canaanites represent every evil that the world has seen. On page 21:

The Curse of Canaan was extended to the land which was named after him, the Land of Canaan. The Canaanites themselves, the people of this land, became the greatest curse upon humanity, and so they remain today. Not only did they originate the practices of demon-worship, occult rites, child sacrifice, and cannibalism, but as they went abroad, they brought these obscene practices into every land which they entered. Not only did they bring their demonic cult to Egypt, but, known by their later name, the Phoenicians, as they were called after 1200 B.C., they became the demonizers of civilization through successive epochs, being known in medieval history as the Venetians, who destroyed the great Byzantine Christian civilization, and later as “the black nobility,” which infiltrated the nations of Europe and gradually assumed power through trickery, revolution, and financial legerdemain.

That passage is an example of pulling things out of a hat. Mullins claims that the Canaanites brought those practices of child sacrifice and cannibalism in every land in which they entered but provides absolutely no references to back that up. Even the Jewish Encyclopedia says that child sacrifices were unlikely to have been a part of Canaanite worship:

Apart from the offerings of fruits from the earth and the firstlings of cattle, much is not known with regard to the rites of the popular Ba’al-Worship. Self-torture and mutilation characteristic of the Phenician type (I Kings xviii. 28) were probably absent from the simpler and freer usages of the primitive local observances. It is also doubtful whether the sacrifice of children, proper to the service of Molech, was ever a feature of inland Canaanitic Ba’al-Worship (Jer. xix. 5 is to be corrected by the LXX.). The shrines were little more than altars with the symbol of the Ashtoreth planted beside it—the sacred tree-stem or pole named from an old Canaanite goddess, Ashera, with whom Ashtoreth was identified.

Continued on page 22 of C of C:

The reputation of Canaan is to be found in many ancient records, although its foul history has been carefully expunged from even more of the historic archives and libraries. In 1225 B.C., the Pharaoh Merneptah, who, because of his victories in the Canaanite region, was known as “Binder of Gezer,” set up a stele to commemorate his successes. Among the inscriptions placed thereon was this: “Plundered is the Canaan, with every evil; All lands are united and pacified.”

Which ancient records? How about listing them Mr. Mullins?

Page 25:

Nimrod became the first man to rule the whole world.

Where does that come from?

Page 27:

The records of the genocide against the people of Shem are apparent throughout the archives of history, but there is not a school or university whose faculty will apprise its students of this simple fact. This in itself explains much which is usually dismissed as being “beyond explanation.” The reason or this odd development is that the descendants of Ham traditionally have usurped the educational process, through their earlier usurpation of the priesthood to carryon their Satanic work. They have controlled the educational system ever since, converting it to their own evil purposes. It is of even greater interest that not a single school of theology anywhere in the world takes note of this central fact of history, a red thread which runs continuously through the record of events.

Again, more unsupported assertions.

Page 27:

However, a much more important point, and one that has again been obscured or hidden by the priests who controlled the educational system throughout the last three thousand years, is the fact that it was Shem who founded and built the great civilization of Egypt.

Where the hell did he get that from?

Page 29:

Not only did the priests falsify the records of Shem, but they also succeeded in eliminating most of the subsequent history of his fair-skinned descendants, the Shemites, or, as they are sometimes called, the Semites.

It is not clear what lineage the bible classifies the fair-skinned descendants (whites), if they were even classified at all. If they did come from the line of Shem, they certainly did not come from the line of Jacob. Again Mullins needs to back up his claims. He certainly doesn’t mention that the Edomites also came from the line of Shem.

Page 32:

The Will of Canaan has always been concealed from them because it is the basic program of conspiracy and secret rites which enable the Canaanites to wreak their hatred upon the descendants of Shem.

Who has been wreaking havoc on whom? The fact is the Israelites, the descendants of Shem, have been brutally wreaking havoc on all the Gentiles. See my posts concerning the Books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Jeremiah, Isaiah, and Ezekiel.

Page 35:

The prohibition against mingling with the demon-worshipping Canaanites remained one of God’s strongest commands. God said, “So shall we be separated, I and all of Thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the earth” (Exodus 3:16).

In actuality God prohibited the Israelites from mingling with ANY FOREIGNER – not just the Canaanites which Mullins likes to demonize. For example in Ezra 10:10-11:

Then Ezra the priest stood up and said to them, “You have been unfaithful; you have married foreign women, adding to Israel’s guilt. Now honor the Lord, the God of your ancestors, and do his will. Separate yourselves from the peoples around you and from your foreign wives.”

This racism is promoted to this very day in Israel, where interracial marriages remain illegal.

Page 38:

The Canaanites were divided into the Amorites, Hittites, Moabites, Midianites, Philistines, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, Sepharvaims, Perizzites, and affiliated tribes, all of which are routinely denounced in the Bible.

WRONG. The Ammonites, Moabites, and Edomites are descendants of Shem, not of Ham and certainly not of Canaan. Mullins hoped readers would not notice that because that would destroy his theory that the Shemites were the victims.

Page 38

The destructive nature of the Canaanites upon other nations in which they settled is nowhere more strongly demonstrated than in Egypt, the first land to be corrupted by their barbaric practices.

Again more examples of making an assertion without citing references. Now I’m not necessarily saying that Mullins has been making stuff out of thin air, though I believe a good bit of the book has been made up, but why does he not document these things? Where could I go to look for this material?

Page 40:

It was not long before the simple ceremonies of vice began to pall on the worshippers of Baal. They sought greater excitement in rites of human sacrifice and cannibalism, in which the torture and murder of small children were featured. To consolidate their power over the people, the priests of the Canaanites claimed that all firstborn children were owed to their demon gods, and they were given over for sacrifice. This lewd and barbaric practice was noted in Isaiah 57:3-5: “But you, draw near hither, sons of the sorceress, offspring of the adulterer and the harlot. Of whom are you making sport? Against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? Are ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood? Inflaming yourself with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the cleft of the rocks?”

That passage in Isaiah does not refer specifically to the Canaanites. It refers to any group of people considered the enemies of the Israelites.

Though I only intended to cover chapter 1, an Amazon reviewer pointed out to this error in Chapter 2:

The first paragraph in Chapter 2 is in significant error. Tubal-cain was NOT Noah’s brother. Noah was born through a man named Lamech in Adam’s downline, not Cain’s downline. Cain’s downline had a man named Lamech too but not the same Lamech that was born of Methusaleh.

Quoting From the Bible out of Context

Mullins quote many things out of context from the bible, which is not unusual among con-artists. On page 37:

“But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe and to do all His commandments and His statutes which I command thee this day, that all these curses shall come upon thee and overtake thee: …. The stranger that is within thy gates [the Canaanites or their descendants-Ed.] shall get up above thee very high, and thou shalt come down very low. He shall lend to thee, and thou shall not lend to him; he shall be the head and thou shalt be the tail” (Deuteronomy 28: 15, 43-44).

Again, Mullins makes the Canaanites out to be the evil ones which is why he puts their name in the brackets when the actual intention of the verse is to ANY GENTILE. This is one of the most egregious pieces of disinformation in the book. What Chapter 28 (verses 15 to the end) of Deuteronomy is, is the lists of punishments that Yahweh threatens the Israelites if they do not heed all his commands as laid out under Mosaic Law. Among the commands are that of the extermination of all the native inhabitants of Canaan (which the Israelites plan to reside) which includes the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites. Also among the commands are that of a choice of enslavement or extermination to Gentiles who are not in the vicinity of where the Israelites reside. Deuteronomy 20:10-12, 15:

When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city … 15 This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.

The verses of Deuteronomy 28: 15, 43-44 that Mullins cites is actually Yahweh’s punishment to the Israelites that if they don’t enslave the Gentiles through usury, the Gentiles will enslave THEM through usury. Deuteronomy 28:12 is what Yahweh instructs the Israelites:

You will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. The Lord will make you the head, not the tail.

Deuteronomy 23:20 in the Living Torah:

Do not deduct advance interest from your brother, whether it is interest for money, interest for food, or interest for anything else for which interest is normally taken. Although you may take such interest from a gentile, you may not do so from your brother. If you keep this rule, God will bless you in all your endeavors on the land to which you are coming to occupy.

That paragraph right after Mullins’ Deuteronomy quote:

Certainly this is the situation which exists in the United States today. The Venetians control the Federal Reserve System; they lend to us, but we do not lend to them; they are the head, and we are the tail.

The Venetians control the Fed? Are you kidding me?


You really don’t need to read past the preface of this book. On the bottom of page 9 of the preface:

It is for this reason that politicians, of necessity, must become followers of Satan in the rebellion against God. Politicians must deceive the people in order to gain power over them, just as Satan must deceive the whole world if he is to continue his rebellion against God.

Though Mullins is correct that the ugly history of the struggles of the world is that of society fighting against a Satanic order, he absolves the real Satanists and points the finger at the wrong group of people. He like many in the controlled media, makes the enemies look like the good guys while making the victims out to be the perpetrators. If you have read any of my previous posts addressing the nature of the God (Yahweh) of the bible, you know that Yahweh is not the loving universal god that he is made out to be. In fact he is the exact opposite. Mullins is either a gatekeeper or a dupe. Unfortunately many have fallen for conman like him.

Mullins’ Bio

In forty years of dedicated investigative research, Eustace Mullins has drawn considerable return fire. He was kept under daily surveillance by agents of the FBI for thirty-two years; no charges were ever placed against him. He is the only person ever fired from the staff of the Library of Congress for political reasons. He is the only writer who has had a book burned in Europe since 1945. After serving thirty-eight months in the U. S. Army Air Force during World War II, Eustace Mullins was educated at Washington and Lee University, Ohio State University, University of North Dakota, and New York University.

I find it quite odd that for someone who’s been doing 40 years of investigative research, worked in the Library of Congress, and attended four different universities he has not been able to provide any sort of real documentation backing up his claims in Curse of Canaan. If you are presenting a piece of work that is highly revisionist and highly anti-mainstream then the burden is on you to make your case and you had better back up your claims carefully. He doesn’t. When you see “credentials” like that stated just above then you should immediately be suspicious. How does one with all those credentials have little in the way of actual research to show? Eustace Mullins has quite a fan base which is odd for someone who is anti-establishment. The man also lived to a ripe old age of 87. Go figure.


Whether a group of people such as the Canaanites actually existed, I don’t know. Much of the bible has been a fabrication of history. However the intentions are clear. Regardless whether the Canaanites actually practiced the things that Mullins states is not the point. The problem with Mullins is that he demonizes one group of people and make them look like the perpetrators, while excusing the real perpetrators. This is a classic Jewish tactic (I’m not saying Mullins is Jewish, though he may be a Shabbos Goy). We do know that the Israelites of the bible considers every Gentile neighbor as their enemy, including the Canaanites, with no exception. The Israelites in the bible invaded Canaan and stole their land. The same thing happened 70 years ago with the Jews stealing Palestinian land to create the state of Israel.

We have seen the Jewish media make Hitler and the Germans out to be the subhumans that they were not. Ditto the Arab-Muslims who the Jewish media has constantly denigrated since 9/11. The problem is not the Canaanites, the Edomites, the Moabites, or Jebusites. The problem is the Israelites who author after author has made them seem like the good guys. Now much of the stories of the bible were fabrications of history, but the point is that the stories are taken seriously by those who are in power.

Unfortunately people will continue to be duped by Judaeo-Christian gatekeepers such as Eustace Mullins, Michael Hoffman, Nathaniel Kapner, and E Michael Jones because it is easy to trick people with the bible. Most people have a very superficial understanding of it and have never examined it carefully. The main theme of the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) is that of racial separatism. The bible requires that the Israelites MUST remain apart from everyone else. They must remain apart because they feel they are superior to everyone else and do not want to be tainted by “lesser” blood. Some feel that in order to remain separate, they must even exterminate their immediate neighbors to eliminate the risk of becoming assimilated. And in order to get the Israelites motivated to destroy their neighbors, they feel they must demonize their neighbors by spreading exaggerated fears of them as being dangerous and violent. That’s the reason why the bible vilify groups of people such as the Canaanites, Edomites, Moabites, or any other “ites”. They want to present them as dangerous subhuman savages so the Jews will continue to remain separate from them.

Israeli Influence in Colombia

I just came back from a three week trip to Colombia. It was my first time to South America. I started in Cartegena, in the north, and worked my way southward to Bogota, where I flew out.

What I noticed during my travels in Colombia were the large number of backpackers from Israel and the large number of Israeli owned business. Some destinations such as Tapanga, which is on the northern coast near Santa Marta, are dominated by Israeli owned hostels and restaurants. Israelis are attracted to Colombia because it is relatively cheap and has a vibe that they like.


The Brunch restaurant

“American” owned restaurant but owner is likely of Jewish descent. The restaurant was actually pretty good. I had several meals there during my stay in Salento. There are roughly 3000 COP to one US dollar. The average meal is around $5-6.

The walls of the restaurant:

Restaurant in the Corcora valley which is about 10 miles east of Salento:


I stayed one night in the Zohar Hostel in the historic district of Bogota. I asked the person managing the hostel about the name. He was not the owner of the hostel, but a relative of the owner. The manager was a native Colombian and spoke good English because he lived in the US for a few years. He said the name did come from a Jewish book, but he was a not a fan of the book. The manager liked some of the other Jewish books though. I did not ask whether he was Jewish or not.

I had dinner with this Israeli couple from my hotel in Medellin. They now lived in the US. They were fairly decent people and was glad I got to meet them.

Why the Jewish Media Control is so Dangerous

While they are some who recognize Jewish domination of the media, most do not understand why this is necessarily a problem. The biggest reason why this is a problem is that Jews have a very long history of infiltration and subversion of Gentile societies. They believe they have a God-given right to rule over all others as endorsed throughout Judaic scriptures. Jews have always been subverters of gentile societies. This goes back thousands of years. Ancient Greece, Rome, and Egypt were absolutely destroyed by Jewish subversion. Their “us versus them” mentality goes back to at least biblical times. They truly believe they are at a never-ending war with the Gentiles. Jews tend to promote the exact opposite of what they themselves practice. They are a highly ethnocentric group of people and work together as a team. Jews are not the only group of people who are tribalistic, but they are far and away the most successful when it comes to control and subordination of others. Tribalistic people tend to view people of their own kind as “brothers” and view others as inferior. They tend to get highly offended when an outsider criticizes one of their people, regardless of whether the criticism was just or not. I know from experience on message boards that Jews will lash out at you if you merely suggest that Jews control a large proportion of the media or banks. Generally what the Jewish media promotes as good for us is bad for them and what they promote as bad for us is actually good for them.

Jewry practices:

  • pride
  • high investment parenting
  • long-term planning and goal setting
  • solidarity and brotherhood
  • teamwork with group-based goals
  • racial purity – for example, interracial marriages are illegal in Israel
  • racism towards Gentiles
  • reverence for the past
  • no gambling – gambling is illegal in Israel
  • no debt to the Gentiles
  • aggression

Jewry promotes (for the Gentiles):

  • guilt
  • low investment parenting, sexualization of children, and rebelliousness among teens
  • radical individualism such as homosexuality, feminism, anarchy, etc
  • the idea of self-importance
  • minding your own business
  • living in the moment – for example materialism
  • destruction and irrelevance of the past – for example mocking the confederate flag
  • polarization such as the promotion of divisive politics
  • race-mixing
  • open borders
  • gambling
  • pornography
  • being dependent on the system (i.e. government, corporations, police)
  • indebtedness to the Jewish bankers
  • pacifism and politeness (except against Israel’s enemies)

The biggest reason why they promote ideas like race-mixing, polarization, and atomized individualism is to fragment Gentile society. When everyone else is disorganized, confused, and pointing fingers at one another, it becomes easier to move up the ladder to keys areas of societal control and subvert from within. If there is going to be any Gentile solidarity, it is going to be for the benefit of the Jews only.

Now I recognize that Jews in the West mainly watch the same controlled media as the Gentiles. However, Jews being mainly of the upper class, are less affected by societal debauchery than the lower end of society who are most affected by it.

Jews do not criticize their own people. No matter what type of crimes they commit, they are going to absolve them of wrongdoing. For example, those living in the US may recall the child-molesting fiasco at Penn State several years ago. Jerry Sandusky was an assistant coach to Joe Paterno. Though Sandusky, a Jew, was the one who committed the molestations, the media put the blame on Paterno, who was a Gentile. They blamed Paterno for “ignoring” the problem that has been going on for years.

The Unholy Bible: Yahweh as Satan

Our philosophers will discuss all the shortcomings of the various beliefs of the “goyim,” but no one will ever bring under discussion our faith from its true point of view since this will be fully learned by none save ours who will never dare to betray its secrets. – The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Below are thirty sets of verses that picked out from my reading of the Old Testament. I make the case that Yahweh, the god of the bible, is a satanist. It was not easy to choose which verses to include because there were so many malicious passages in the OT. If you wanted to see a more extensive list, check out my posts on the Book of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, and the minor prophets.

1) Deuteronomy 2:25 This very day I will begin to put the terror and fear of you on all the nations under heaven. They will hear reports of you and will tremble and be in anguish because of you.

2) Deuteronomy 7:15 The Lord will keep you free from every disease. He will not inflict on you the horrible diseases you knew in Egypt, but he will inflict them on all who hate you. 16 You must destroy all the peoples the Lord your God gives over to you. Do not look on them with pity

3) Deuteronomy 11:24 Every place where you set your foot will be yours: Your territory will extend from the desert to Lebanon, and from the Euphrates River to the Mediterranean Sea. 25 No one will be able to stand against you. The Lord your God, as he promised you, will put the terror and fear of you on the whole land, wherever you go.

4) Deuteronomy 12:1 These are the decrees and laws you must be careful to follow in the land that the Lord, the God of your ancestors, has given you to possess—as long as you live in the land. 2 Destroy completely all the places on the high mountains, on the hills and under every spreading tree, where the nations you are dispossessing worship their gods. 3 Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones and burn their Asherah poles in the fire; cut down the idols of their gods and wipe out their names from those places.

The Protocols of Zion (#14) repeats the same message:

When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of the One God with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People and through whom our same destiny is united with the destinies of the world. We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief.

5) Deuteronomy 20:10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies. 15 This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.

6) Deuteronomy 20:16 However, in the cities of the nations the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes. 17 Completely destroy them—the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites—as the Lord your God has commanded you.

7) Deuteronomy 23:20 You shall not deduct interest from loans to your countryman, whether in money or food or anything else that can be deducted as interest. You may deduct interest from loans to foreigners, but not from loans to your countryman – so that the Lord your God may bless you in all your undertakings in the land which you are about to invade and occupy.

8) Joshua 6:20 When the trumpets sounded, the army shouted, and at the sound of the trumpet, when the men gave a loud shout, the wall collapsed; so everyone charged straight in, and they took the city. 21 They devoted the city (Jericho) to the Lord and destroyed with the sword every living thing in it—men and women, young and old, cattle, sheep and donkeys.

9) Joshua 8:25 Twelve thousand men and women fell that day—all the people of Ai. 26 For Joshua did not draw back the hand that held out his javelin until he had destroyed all who lived in Ai. 27 But Israel did carry off for themselves the livestock and plunder of this city (unlike Jericho where they were specifically instructed not to), as the Lord had instructed Joshua. 28 So Joshua burned Ai and made it a permanent heap of ruins, a desolate place to this day.

10) Joshua 11:12 Joshua took all these royal cities and their kings and put them to the sword. He totally destroyed them, as Moses the servant of th e Lord had commanded. 13 Yet Israel did not burn any of the cities built on their mounds—except Hazor, which Joshua burned. 14 The Israelites carried off for themselves all the plunder and livestock of these cities, but all the people they put to the sword until they completely destroyed them, not sparing anyone that breathed.

11) Joshua 2:24 “The Lord has surely given the whole land into our hands; all the people are melting in fear because of us

12) Joshua 9:24 They answered Joshua, “Your servants were clearly told how the Lord your God had commanded his servant Moses to give you the whole land and to wipe out all its inhabitants from before you. So we feared for our lives because of you, and that is why we did this.”

13) Joshua 10:40 He left no survivors. He totally destroyed all who breathed, just as the Lord, the God of Israel, had commanded.

14) Joshua 11:20 For it was the Lord himself who hardened their hearts to wage war against Israel, so that he might destroy them totally, exterminating them without mercy, as the Lord had commanded Moses.

15) Joshua 11:21-22 Joshua totally destroyed them and their towns.  No Anakites were left in Israelite territory; only in Gaza, Gath and Ashdod did any survive.

16) Isaiah 19:2 “I will stir up Egyptian against Egyptian— brother will fight against brother, neighbor against neighbor, city against city, kingdom against kingdom. 3 The Egyptians will lose heart, and I will bring their plans to nothing; they will consult the idols and the spirits of the dead, the mediums and the spiritists. 4 I will hand the Egyptians over to the power of a cruel master, and a fierce king will rule over them,” declares the Lord, the Lord Almighty …

… 7 And the land of Judah will bring terror to the Egyptians; everyone to whom Judah is mentioned will be terrified, because of what the Lord Almighty is planning against them.

17) Isaiah 13:15 Whoever is captured will be thrust through; all who are caught will fall by the sword.16 Their infants will be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses will be looted and their wives violated. (Tanakh: And their wives shall be raped)17 See, I will stir up against them the Medes, who do not care for silver and have no delight in gold. 18 Their bows will strike down the young men; they will have no mercy on infants, nor will they look with compassion on children. 19  Babylon, the jewel of kingdoms, the pride and glory of the Babylonians, will be overthrown by God like Sodom and Gomorrah. 20 She will never be inhabited or lived in through all generations;

18) Isaiah 24:1-3 The Lord’s Devastation of the Earth

1 See, the Lord is going to lay waste the earth and devastate it; he will ruin its face and scatter its inhabitants—2 it will be the same for priest as for people, for the master as for his servant, for the mistress as for her servant, for seller as for buyer, for borrower as for lender, for debtor as for creditor. 3 The earth will be completely laid waste and totally plundered. The Lord has spoken this word.

19) Isaiah 30:31 The voice of the Lord will shatter Assyria; with his rod he will strike them down. 32 Every stroke the Lord lays on them with his punishing club will be to the music of timbrels and harps,

20) Isaiah 34:2 The Lord is angry with all nations; his wrath is on all their armies. He will totally destroy them, he will give them over to slaughter. 3 Their slain will be thrown out, their dead bodies will stink; the mountains will be soaked with their blood.

21) Jeremiah 1:9-10 Then the Lord reached out his hand and touched my mouth and said to me (Jeremiah), “I have put my words in your mouth. See, today I appoint you over nations and kingdoms to uproot and tear down, to destroy and overthrow, to build and to plant.”

22) Jeremiah 25:33 At that time those slain by the Lord will be everywhere—from one end of the earth to the other. They will not be mourned or gathered up or buried, but will be like dung lying on the ground.

23) Jeremiah 46:28 Do not be afraid, Jacob my servant, for I am with you,” declares the Lord. “Though I completely destroy all the nations among which I scatter you, I will not completely destroy you.

24) Ezekiel 39:17 this is what the Sovereign Lord says: Call out to every kind of bird and all the wild animals: ‘Assemble and come together from all around to the sacrifice I am preparing for you, the great sacrifice on the mountains of Israel. There you will eat flesh and drink blood. 18 You will eat the flesh of mighty men and drink the blood of the princes of the earth as if they were rams and lambs, goats and bulls

25) Ezekiel 25:7 therefore I will stretch out my hand against you (Ammonites) and give you as plunder to the nations. I will wipe you out from among the nations and exterminate you from the countries. I will destroy you, and you will know that I am the Lord.’”

26) Ezekiel 29:5 I will leave you in the desert, you and all the fish of your streams. You will fall on the open field and not be gathered or picked up. I will give you as food to the beasts of the earth and the birds of the sky.

27) Psalms 110:5 The Lord is at your right hand; he will crush kings on the day of his wrath. 6 He will judge the nations, heaping up the dead and crushing the rulers of the whole earth.

28) Zephaniah 1:2 “I will sweep away everything from the face of the earth,” declares the Lord. 3 “I will sweep away both man and beast; I will sweep away the birds in the sky and the fish in the sea— and the idols that cause the wicked to stumble.” “When I destroy all mankind on the face of the earth,” declares the Lord, 4 “I will stretch out my hand against Judah and against all who live in Jerusalem.

29) Zephaniah 3:6 “I have destroyed nations; their strongholds are demolished. I have left their streets deserted, with no one passing through. Their cities are laid waste; they are deserted and empty. 7 Of Jerusalem I thought, ‘Surely you will fear me and accept correction!’ Then her place of refuge would not be destroyed, nor all my punishments come upon her. But they were still eager to act corruptly in all they did. 8 Therefore wait for me,” declares the Lord, “for the day I will stand up to testify. I have decided to assemble the nations, to gather the kingdoms and to pour out my wrath on them— all my fierce anger. The whole world will be consumed by the fire of my jealous anger.

30) Zechariah 7:14 ‘I (God) scattered them (Israelites) with a whirlwind among all the nations, where they were strangers. The land they left behind them was so desolate that no one traveled through it. This is how they made the pleasant land desolate.’”


Satanism in the Bible – The Minor Prophets

The minor prophets which are the Books of Hosea, Amos, Micah, Joel, Obadiah, Jonah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi in the Old Testament are relatively unknown. However, there is a wealth of information in some of those books that along with Ezekiel, Isaiah, and Deuteronomy, point to the destructive nature of the Jews. Though much of the stories are made up, the intentions are clear and that is the destruction and enslavement of the Gentiles.

Ruthlessness Against Gentiles

Joel 2:20 “I will drive the northern horde far from you,
pushing it into a parched and barren land;
its eastern ranks will drown in the Dead Sea
and its western ranks in the Mediterranean Sea.
And its stench will go up;
    its smell will rise.”

Joel 4:18 “In that day the mountains will drip new wine,
and the hills will flow with milk;
all the ravines of Judah will run with water.
A fountain will flow out of the Lord’s house
and will water the valley of acacias.
19 But Egypt will be desolate,
    Edom a desert waste,
because of violence done to the people of Judah,
in whose land they shed innocent blood.

Read the full post »

the real Syrian Free Press

War Press Info ~ Archive of Most Important Reliable Global War News

The Rabbit Hole

Denying the truth doesn't change the facts.

Levant Report

the Real Middle East, debunking the sound bites

Mothman777's Blog

A different perspective, suggestions for a better way of life for a better future for all